Title: | Digital Ladebug debugger |
Moderator: | TLE::LUCIA |
Created: | Fri Feb 28 1992 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 969 |
Total number of notes: | 3959 |
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
493.1 | UHUH::LUCIA | http://asaab.zko.dec.com/~lucia/biography.html | Fri Mar 29 1996 16:45 | 10 | |
493.2 | GEMGRP::MONTELEONE | Mon Apr 01 1996 10:24 | 24 | ||
493.3 | Preliminary analysis... | GEMGRP::MONTELEONE | Mon Apr 01 1996 11:40 | 57 | |
493.4 | file command is behaving correctly | GOLLY::SHAMIM | Tue Apr 02 1996 15:58 | 12 | |
493.5 | I'm trying to see the source code | DECC::SEIGEL | Tue Apr 02 1996 17:28 | 7 | |
493.6 | 'use' command | GOLLY::SHAMIM | Wed Apr 03 1996 10:25 | 4 | |
493.7 | Status? | TLE::LUCIA | http://asaab.zko.dec.com/~lucia/biography.html | Wed May 14 1997 20:22 | 3 |
Status? Should ladebug actually collapse all the files with the same spelling into just one? | |||||
493.8 | Worst case scenario? | VIRRUS::diewald | Vortex of Chaos | Thu May 15 1997 12:06 | 16 |
What happens if you do: cd ./directory1 <compile> -c -o ./file.o ./file.xyz cd ../directory2 <compile> -c -o ./file.o ./file.xyz cd .. <link> -o obnoxious ./directory1/file.o ./directory2/file.o Is it possible to manufacture a situation where you could get identical file names for *different* files? This would break in the case of collapsing all of the file names. Is it something that someone might have a valid and compelling reason to do? (I can't think of one, which is why collapsing all the names sounds like a good idea.) |