| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 130.1 | | DRINKS::CARIGNAN | Don Carignan | Wed Oct 05 1994 19:40 | 4 |
| 130.2 | For comparison... | QUARRY::reeves | Jon Reeves, UNIX compiler group | Thu Oct 06 1994 12:01 | 2 |
| 130.3 | | SSPADE::MURRAY | Wanfang Murray | Thu Oct 06 1994 17:08 | 15 |
| 130.4 | Oh, *interactive* | QUARRY::reeves | Jon Reeves, UNIX compiler group | Fri Oct 07 1994 11:58 | 3 |
| 130.5 | | DRINKS::CARIGNAN | Don Carignan | Fri Oct 07 1994 16:27 | 19 |
| 130.6 | command line length limit increased in V3.0-16 | SSPADE::SHAMIM | | Wed Nov 09 1994 15:33 | 43 |
| 130.7 | Can't use continuation characters?! | DECCXX::REINIG | This too shall change | Wed Apr 10 1996 15:02 | 9 |
| 130.8 | | DECCXX::REINIG | This too shall change | Wed Apr 10 1996 15:05 | 12 |
| 130.9 | Can we classify this as a "bug" now? | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | The moment is a masterpiece | Tue May 21 1996 11:32 | 17 |
| 130.10 | | UHUH::MURRAY | Wanfang Murray | Tue May 21 1996 15:49 | 8 |
| 130.11 | Has this been fixed since -014? | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | The moment is a masterpiece | Wed May 22 1996 10:25 | 13 |
| 130.12 | | TLE::C_STOCKS | Cheryl Stocks | Wed Feb 19 1997 13:29 | 9 |
| Is the limit for the length of a line in a source'd file still 4096? (It seems
to be.) I have a 9030-character command that I need to be able to debug.
I can workaround the ladebug restriction by running the command directly,
then attaching to the process, but that's a bit cumbersome. Can ladebug's
limit be increased via acommand line option or env. variable? (I couldn't
find anything in the ladebug man page.)
Thanks,
cheryl
|
| 130.13 | | ADA9X::BRETT | | Wed Feb 19 1997 21:34 | 5 |
| Given dbx was 40960, why did ladebug stop at 4096? By my calculations
40960 bytes of physical memory costs about 25 cents...and ladebug isn't even
using it all the time :-)
/Bevin
|
| 130.14 | | RDGENG::HAQUE | Shaheed R. Haque, 830-3531, reo2-f/b3 | Thu Feb 20 1997 03:02 | 8 |
|
>Given dbx was 40960, why did ladebug stop at 4096? By my calculations
>40960 bytes of physical memory costs about 25 cents...and ladebug isn't even
>using it all the time :-)
Surely virtual memory costs virtually nothing?
:-)
|
| 130.15 | twasn't always so... | QUARRY::petert | rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty | Thu Feb 20 1997 10:21 | 4 |
| But to be fair, it was originally 4096 in dbx too. We had a request to up
it and a factor of 10 seemed reasonable.
PeterT
|
| 130.16 | | TLE::LUCIA | http://asaab.zko.dec.com/~lucia/biography.html | Thu Feb 20 1997 12:13 | 4 |
| "The only reasonable numbers are zero, one and infinity"
;-)
Tim
|
| 130.17 | | TLE::MURRAY | Wanfang Murray | Mon Feb 24 1997 07:04 | 4 |
|
The limit is artificial. We will look into this.
Wanfang
|