[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference turris::decc_bugs

Title:DEC C Problem Reporting Forum
Notice:Report DEC C++ problems in TURRIS::C_PLUS_PLUS
Moderator:CXXC::REPETETCHEON
Created:Fri Nov 13 1992
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1299
Total number of notes:6249

1148.0. "fp_class for D float, fp_classf for F float ?" by CUJO::SAMPSON () Mon May 20 1996 22:59

T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name		DateLines
1148.1suggested F float workaroundCUJO::SAMPSONMon May 20 1996 23:1034
1148.2suggested D float workaroundCUJO::SAMPSONMon May 20 1996 23:1734
1148.3RTL::HANEKTue May 21 1996 10:366
1148.4F float denorms identified also?CUJO::SAMPSONTue May 21 1996 11:3410
1148.5RTL::HANEKWed May 22 1996 10:002
1148.6so is this seen as a "problem"?CUJO::SAMPSONWed May 22 1996 23:1649
1148.7RTL::HANEKThu May 23 1996 09:5910
1148.8my 2 centsCUJO::SAMPSONThu May 23 1996 23:175
1148.9CSC32::D_DERAMODan D'Eramo, Customer Support CenterTue Jun 11 1996 13:1412
1148.10never too late, where a critical need existsCUJO::SAMPSONSun Mar 16 1997 22:2512
	Dan,

	I see from COMET that you entered 1148.9 in response to a customer
call.  My guess is that it probably isn't too late, and this issue might be
revisited by engineering, if an IPMT case were entered, or even if a
suggestion QAR were entered.

	I can accept the justification that was presented for leaving
fp_classf() the way it is, and just do my own checking where needed.
However, you customer (or some other) might not see it that way.

	Bob Sampson