| Title: | DECC |
| Notice: | General DEC C discussions |
| Moderator: | TLE::D_SMITH N TE |
| Created: | Fri Nov 13 1992 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 2212 |
| Total number of notes: | 11045 |
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1815.1 | Could you provide the OS you are using and its version? | PTHRED::PORTANTE | Peter Portante, DTN 381-2261, (603)881-2261, MS ZKO2-3/Q18 | Tue Jun 04 1996 16:02 | 2 |
| 1815.2 | OS version | HDLITE::SAYLOR | Tue Jun 04 1996 16:35 | 3 | |
| 1815.3 | libc.so malloc is NOT thread safe | PTHRED::PORTANTE | Peter Portante, DTN 381-2261, (603)881-2261, MS ZKO2-3/Q18 | Wed Jun 05 1996 10:55 | 11 |
| 1815.4 | the behavior is expected - but it hurts - will 4.0 hurt less? | MSBCS::SCHNEIDER | too dangerous to mention | Wed Jun 05 1996 14:19 | 9 |
| 1815.5 | Thread safe malloc is the 'good' one. | SOAK2::neth | Craig Neth | Wed Jun 05 1996 15:49 | 8 |
| 1815.6 | History | DCEIDL::BUTENHOF | Dave Butenhof, DECthreads | Thu Jun 06 1996 08:40 | 32 |
| 1815.7 | NETRIX::"[email protected]" | Gerrit Saylor | Thu Sep 12 1996 11:11 | 7 | |
| 1815.8 | DCEIDL::BUTENHOF | Dave Butenhof, DECthreads | Thu Sep 12 1996 15:00 | 10 | |
| 1815.9 | Not a bug | SMURF::DLONG | Wed Sep 25 1996 11:25 | 10 | |
| 1815.10 | well, maybe it is a bug | SMURF::DLONG | Wed Sep 25 1996 11:29 | 6 |