| Title: | DECC |
| Notice: | General DEC C discussions |
| Moderator: | TLE::D_SMITH N TE |
| Created: | Fri Nov 13 1992 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 2212 |
| Total number of notes: | 11045 |
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1697.1 | No long double support in DEC C Alpha Unix so far | SUBPAC::FARICELLI | Wed Feb 28 1996 10:12 | 5 | |
| 1697.2 | Yes, but even if it were, .0 would not link | CXXC::REPETE | Rich Peterson 381-1802 ZKO2-3/N30 | Wed Feb 28 1996 13:53 | 7 |
| 1697.3 | RTL::HANEK | Thu Feb 29 1996 10:46 | 9 | ||
| 1697.4 | here is the code ; SEGV | UFHIS::JPARETI | Wed Mar 06 1996 12:52 | 301 | |
| 1697.5 | Try -std | CXXC::REPETE | Rich Peterson 381-1802 ZKO2-3/N30 | Wed Mar 06 1996 13:35 | 51 |
| 1697.6 | it still dumps a core | UFHIS::JPARETI | Thu Mar 07 1996 06:45 | 21 | |
| 1697.7 | stack size? | MUCTEC::BECKER | Hartmut B., VMS & Languages, Munich | Thu Mar 07 1996 09:12 | 6 |
| 1697.8 | yeah, the stacksize was it ... | UFHIS::JPARETI | Thu Mar 07 1996 09:23 | 50 | |
| 1697.9 | wrong results though | UFHIS::JPARETI | Fri Mar 08 1996 05:51 | 21 | |
| 1697.10 | And maybe a moderator will fix the title | HANNAH::ALFRED | Alfred von Campe (DECterm/VTstar) | Fri Mar 08 1996 08:29 | 8 |
| 1697.11 | Is this any better? | SUBPAC::FARICELLI | Fri Mar 08 1996 10:59 | 309 | |
| 1697.12 | Still not all the way there... | SUBPAC::FARICELLI | Fri Mar 08 1996 14:09 | 10 |