T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3909.1 | This is not low fat! | NAPIER::HEALEY | M&ES, MRO4, 297-2426 | Tue Mar 08 1994 08:05 | 11 |
|
I hate to tell you but this is not low fat despite the fact
that you used low fat ingredients. A woman should have between
20-40 grams of fat per day and a man between 30-60, on the
low end of the range if trying to lose weight. One serving
of this recipe has almost 20 grams of fat (12 of it from the
light butter)!
It sounds good though.
Karen
|
3909.2 | Please fix the spelling on the title, should be "Saltimbocca" | DFSAXP::JP | And the winner is.... | Tue Mar 08 1994 08:38 | 1 |
| Thanks
|
3909.3 | less fat is fine too | MR4DEC::MAHONEY | | Tue Mar 08 1994 09:19 | 16 |
| No low fat when you use 4 ounces of butter!
This dish is widely known in Spain as "San Jacobo" steak, and lots of
bars and restaurants serve it as "tapas" and also as main course...
You could use just one tablespoon olive oil (polinsaturated or
"vegetable", not animal, fat) to brown meat, even less than that browns
nicely if you use a small pan. Then it is OK to use low fat milk,
though the fat content in 1/2 cup of milk is almost non distingishable
from 1/2 cup of low fat milk. In Spain we've been using olive oil for a
thousand years and our incidence of heart attacks are very low compared
with other nations. We eat LOTS of fried fish, but in oil, never in
animal fat and sure it is fattening, but not dangerous to one's health.
(and tastes heavenly! nice and crunchy, not a bit soggy or limp)
Ana
|
3909.4 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | High Voltage | Fri Mar 11 1994 23:03 | 3 |
| Spain's low heart attack rate is similar to that of France, except the
reason for it is due to the consumption of rioja, etc rather than
bordeaux... :-)
|
3909.5 | Spain enjoys Rioja well before the Caesars... | MR4DEC::MAHONEY | | Mon Mar 14 1994 13:22 | 6 |
| Then enjoy a good glass of bordeaux with the meal! still, you cannot
call it "low fat" dish, but a very savory and classy one, high in both,
calories and enjoyment.
Ana
|
3909.6 | Mea Culpa | MROA::BERICSON | MRO1-1/KL31 DTN 297-3200 | Tue Mar 15 1994 09:24 | 6 |
| Mea maxima culpa... I should have known better re 1/4 cup butter..
But I used "I can't believe its not butter". A little help with their
voodoo labeling. They break up the fat content into saturated and
unsaturated. Parts is parts and fat is fat? Edickate me.
P.S. will use oil for make in advance futures. Promise!
|
3909.7 | My 2 cents on fat... | MR4DEC::MAHONEY | | Tue Mar 15 1994 12:52 | 32 |
| regarding fat... there are several types, saturated; insaturated and
polynsaturated...
the worst for our health is saturated (or aninal fat, real here REAL
butter, lard, and all animal fat) insaturated and polynsaturated are
vegetable fats, and the better of the two is polynsaturated because it
contains the highest amount of high density colesterol particles...
these particles travel at a faster speed than the low density ones and
it "helps" the system to get rid of many of the low density fat
particles that attach themselves to the walls of our arteries...
I love cheese and I love butter, but I seldom eat them anymore... my
father had a heart attack 20 years ago and had to drastically cut fat
from his diet... as I said, that was 20 years ago (he is at present 91
years old!) and thanks God, he is still with us... I also made a point,
20 years ago to eat as healthy as I could and... I no longer "crave"
for anything I shouln't eat. (I don't have any recipes that
include butter or lard or bacon that cannot be substituted with
a vegetable version.)
p.s. Palm, and coconut oil are also vetoed, all other oils are fine, the
best being saffrower oil, seconded by olive oil... (those are the two
best in polynsaturated fats)
I learned these tips in Spain, I bet that many will disagree with me
and it is perfectly OK, I just know from my Dad that it works and I
follow the advice, that's all.
Ana
and had to drastically eliminate from his diet those items
|
3909.8 | | GEMCIL::PW::winalski | Careful with that AXP, Eugene | Tue Mar 15 1994 18:03 | 31 |
| RE: .7
That's saturated, unsaturated, and polyunsaturated fats.
The situation isn't at all as clear-cut as you describe.
What is known is that there seems to be a correlation between consumption
of large amounts of saturated fat, such as butter and lard, in the diet and
an increased risk of atherosclerosis and heart attacks. It is also known
that reduction of consumption of saturated fats can lower blood cholesterol
levels and especially the levels of high-density lipoproteins (the "bad
cholesterol" lipoproteins that are thought to contribute to the formation
of atherosclerotic placques in the arteries. Contrariwise, some
unsaturated fat sources, such as olive oil, seem to promote low-density
lipoproteins ("good cholesterol"), which seem to result in reduction of
atherosclerotic placques.
All this stuff is rather iffy, and there are lots of other risk factors and
mitigating behavioral factors involved. There are some cultures that
consume large amounts of saturated fat in the diet but have extremely low
incidences of heart attacks.
Keeping fat in the diet of all kinds down to a reasonable level is good
health advice on several counts, not just reducing risk of heart disease.
My opinion is that a lot of people are too saturated-fat-paranoid these
days. One piece of buttered toast isn't going to condemn you to death by
heart failure next year. On the other hand, eating nothing but eggs fried
in bacon grease isn't good for you either. Moderation is the key.
--PSW
|
3909.9 | I just watch fat in general .... | NAPIER::HEALEY | M&ES, MRO4, 297-2426 | Wed Mar 16 1994 11:34 | 19 |
|
re: this fat discussion
It is the fat in your diet that makes you fat, no matter
whether it is saturated, unsaturated, etc. For those of
us watching our weight, we have to consider all types of
fat. For those of us in danger of heart disease, we have
to consider that "bad" types of fat that cause higher levels
of cholesterol.
My personal philosophy is that I watch my total fat intake
and do not care what type of fat it is. If I keep my fat
intake low then I'm probably protecting myself against heart
disease even if I don't pay attention to the saturated fat
content of the fats I eat. FWIW though, I use olive oil
for most of my cooking.
Karen
|
3909.10 | Extra calories cause weight gain | HYLNDR::WARRINER | Moo? | Wed Mar 16 1994 16:03 | 17 |
| RE: -.1
>It is the fat in your diet that makes you fat, no matter
>whether it is saturated, unsaturated, etc. For those of
This is misleading. The fats in your diet are only one factor
in weight gain. While fats are more easily converted into fats,
overall calories count is a larger factor.
If you eat 1000 calories/day more than you work off you
will gain weight regardless if it's fats, carbohydrates or proteins.
You get no argument from me that fats will lead to weight gain
the easiest, but all 3 will cause you to gain weight if you eat
too much.
-David
|
3909.11 | | GEMCIL::PW::winalski | Careful with that AXP, Eugene | Wed Mar 16 1994 17:01 | 9 |
| RE: .9
Wrong. It is eating more calories than you burn, from whatever source,
that makes one fat. Fats are the most concentrated source of calories in
the diet (which is why the body uses them for energy storage), so
eliminating fat from the diet and replacing it with other foods means that
you can eat the same amount of food but consume fewer calories.
--PSW
|
3909.12 | T factor diet... | NAPIER::HEALEY | M&ES, MRO4, 297-2426 | Thu Mar 17 1994 07:59 | 29 |
|
re: the fat in your diet makes you fat...
Actually, I was quoting a phrase from the book about the T Factor Diet
which is a diet based on reducing your fat consumption while still eating
enough to fill you up. Basically, if you keep your fat intake within the
limits set out in this book you will not gain weight. I think the assumption
here is that you don't absolutely stuff yourself on carbohydrates, etc.
Even if your fat intake is low, if you pig out on low fat items, the little
fat that is in your diet will be the first thing that is converted to
body fat. According to this book, your body finds it more difficult to
convert carbs to body fat. In addition, you burn more calories digesting
carbs than fat thus a low fat diet of 1600 calories is more likely to cause
you to lose weight than a high fat diet of 1600 calories.
I try to follow this diet myself and have found that I cannot lose weight
simply by controlling my fat intake. However, I am not gaining weight.
The T factor diet has a "Quick Melt" plan that does include a reduction in
calories.
Hmmm... maybe the mods should move this string to a separate topic so as
not to distract those interested in Chicken Saltimbocca.
Anyhow, I found the T factor Diet book to be interesting reading.
Karen
|
3909.13 | HDL vs. LDL | ZENDIA::ROLLER | Life's a batch, then you SYS$EXIT | Thu Mar 17 1994 14:21 | 16 |
| re: .8
>levels and especially the levels of high-density lipoproteins (the "bad
>cholesterol" lipoproteins that are thought to contribute to the formation
>of atherosclerotic placques in the arteries. Contrariwise, some
>unsaturated fat sources, such as olive oil, seem to promote low-density
>lipoproteins ("good cholesterol"), which seem to result in reduction of
>atherosclerotic placques.
Set mode rathole
I think this is backwards, I believe that HDL is the good stuff, and
LDL is the bad stuff. At least that's what my doctor told me.
Ken
|
3909.14 | I agree with .13 regarding .8 | MR4DEC::MAHONEY | | Thu Mar 17 1994 14:49 | 13 |
| re .13,
you are right...
.8 got it transposed... may be just got it in a hurry and changed the
order. Low density lipoproteina are the BAD ones...
I throughly got it from our doctor when treating my Dad and from my Dad
himself, he manufactured olive oil and analyzed the oil contantly to
monitor acidity, clarity, etc. etc. etc. Olive oil really HELPS clear
low-density "lipos" from our blood stream.
Ana
|
3909.15 | Memory trickery ... | OCTAVE::VIGNEAULT | Java-Man | Thu Mar 17 1994 14:56 | 10 |
|
The easy way I was told to remember the difference:
LDL = Think of L meaning LOUSY type of cholesterol
HDL = Think of H meaning HEALTHIER type of cholesterol
Makes it easy to remember which is the desirable one.
Lv
|
3909.16 | Good with veal also | POWDML::VISCONTI | | Thu Mar 17 1994 15:43 | 8 |
| LDL, HDL, ???
Anyway I tried this recipe with Veal last night and it came out
excellent. I made a few substitutions with the 'fat stuff' but
the flavors or priscutta (sp ?), swiss and red peppers were great.
Regards,
Jim
|