T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3409.1 | My list .. | OCTAVE::VIGNEAULT | | Wed Jan 08 1992 19:47 | 16 |
|
Well, I'll take a shot at it ...
(The New Basics) Stock: A long simmering, well flavored broth made
from meat, poultry, fish, or vegetables with the addition of herbs
and spices.
(Joy of Cooking) Consomme: Clarified double strength brown stock.
(Joy of Cooking) Bouillon: concentrated brown stock [There's also
chicken bouillon]
Soup: How about any of the above with added ingredients such as
meat, poultry or vegetables.
Larry
|
3409.2 | | RANGER::PESENTI | Only messages can be dragged | Thu Jan 09 1992 07:39 | 11 |
| The main difference between consomme and soup is about $3.50
The main difference between stock and bullion is that while bullion is
a better investment, stock is easier to carry around.
Sorry, I couldn't resist.
|
3409.3 | definition, please | SMURF::HAECK | Debby Haeck | Thu Jan 09 1992 09:09 | 1 |
| Can anyone take a stab at defining, and explaining, "clarified"?
|
3409.4 | | TLE::DBANG::carroll | a woman full of fire | Thu Jan 09 1992 09:12 | 7 |
| Just what it sounds like - stock is cloudy when made (due, I think, to fat
and other particles.) Clarifying it means removing the stuff that makes
it cloudy so that it is clear.
How to do it? I have no idea...
D!
|
3409.5 | Clarify a stock | TOOK::ORENSTEIN | | Thu Jan 09 1992 10:08 | 11 |
| This is the way one of my books said to clarify the stock.
Wet down a large dish towel and ring it out well. Cover a large
bowl with the damp cloth and secure it. I folded tucked all the
ends of the cloth under the bowl. Slowly ladle the stock onto the
cloth. Do not press it in.
When you are done the fat will be trappd in the cloth and the
stock will be clear.
aud...
|
3409.6 | Does anybody think I'm craxy for being confused? | TOOK::ORENSTEIN | | Thu Jan 09 1992 10:20 | 30 |
|
RE .1
Thanks for the exact definitions, but the Stock definitions contains
the word "Broth" which is one of the terms I meant to add to the list
in the starting note.
Does a broth have salt and seasoning?
Lets take a chicken example. Please correct me where my thinking
is wrong:
1. I take a chicken and put it in a pot with some celery, carrots,
onion. I simmer it for a couple of hours.
I now have a BROTH.
2. If I had added seasoning to the above concoction:
I would have a STOCK.
3. (If I had used beef instead of chicken and used much less water,
and then clarified it, I would have CONSOME).
4. And BOUILLON seems to be the same as the BEEF CONSOME or a CLARIFIED
CHICKEN STOCK.
RIGHT?
AUD...
|
3409.7 | clarified | KAOFS::M_FETT | alias Mrs.Barney | Thu Jan 09 1992 12:00 | 12 |
|
I was always under the impression that consumme, while not
necessarily clarified, was boullion without the fat. Best and
easiest way to do that is to put the liquid in a bowl, and into
the fridge over night. The fat solidifies on the top and can
be removed with the spoon. This also seems to leave a "clarified"
product behind.
I am always amused that at that point it does not resemble consumme
as you serve it, but looks like so much soup-flavoured jello! 8-)
Monica
|
3409.8 | clarified butter? | CALS::HEALEY | DTN 297-2426 (was Karen Luby) | Thu Jan 09 1992 13:12 | 4 |
|
How do you clarify butter?
Karen
|
3409.9 | Just melt it to remove the water | MR4DEC::MAHONEY | | Thu Jan 09 1992 14:31 | 4 |
| you remove the water from butter, not the fat...
Ana
|
3409.10 | | SQM::WARRINER | Municipal court jester | Thu Jan 09 1992 14:42 | 12 |
| RE: .8, .9
To clarify butter you want to remove the water and the solids in it.
Heat the butter to evaporate the water, it will bubble alot until all
the water has left and the solids will start to brown. Then pour the
remaining stuff through a strainer lined with a couple of layers of
cheese cloth into a measuring cup or dish that can stand the heat.
This will strain out the solids and you should be left with just the
oil component of the butter.
-David
|
3409.11 | it's in there | 16316::DDESMAISONS | | Thu Jan 09 1992 16:16 | 16 |
|
How about if we "clarify" the spelling of "consomme'" while we're
at it.
The American Heritage has the best definition around for it
too:
"A clear soup made of meat or vegetable stock or broth."
(They apparently forgot the bouillon during this printing,
or they didn't want to confuse anyone.)
Diane
|
3409.12 | | NOVA::FISHER | Rdb/VMS Dinosaur | Fri Jan 10 1992 02:20 | 4 |
| Note 3007 is dedicated to clarifying butter. There is, as yet,
no other note in here which discusses clarifying stock.
ed
|
3409.13 | But seriously | RANGER::PESENTI | Only messages can be dragged | Fri Jan 10 1992 08:25 | 52 |
| As far as practical definitions are concerned,
Stock is the liquid resulting from boiling meat or vegetables in
water.
A soup is usually a variety of solid things floating around in a
stock, or sauce derivative (like the the cream sauce in a chowder).
But you can also use soup to refer to stock/broth/consomm�/bouillon
that is ready to eat.
Broth usually refers the stock part of a soup. So, the cream sauce
in a chowder usually isn't called a broth, but if the chowder was
made using the liquid that resulted from boiling clams (clam stock),
it would be called a broth.
Consomm� is usually a clarified stock. Sometimes there are solid
things in it, but usually they are few (for example, 2 small ravioli
in a large flat bowl of consomm�), so as to emphsize the clarity of
the liquid.
Bouillon is a stock or broth or consomm�, too. In common American
practice, it refers to something made from little salty cubes and
hot water (bouillon cubes). However, if you see it on a menu, its
probably the handmade variety.
So, the bottom line is that all the terms ARE used interchangeably, even if
they should not be. As an ingredient in a recipe, usually you don't see "Soup"
used, with an accomanying recipe for the soup. If any of the others are used
without accompanying definitions/recipes, use cloudy stock for stock or broth,
and clarify it for consomm� or bouillon.
Julia Child teaches this method of clarifying stock:
Strain all the solids from it, and refrigerate overnight. The fat will rise
and solidify, allowing you to remove every tiny bit. Removing the final traces
can be done by dragging a warm damp paper towel over the surface.
Warm the stock over low heat. When it is a tepid liquid (many meat stocks will
be gelatinous when cold), remove a cup. To the removed cup add one egg white
per quart of stock being clarified. Whisk the mixture and mix it back into the
pan. Continue to heat gradually until the mixture comes to the slow boil. The
egg whites will begine to cook, and will coagulate into a gray mass that floats.
After cooking at a slow boil for about 10 minutes. Strain the whole mess
thru 2 layers of wet cheese cloth. The stock will now be crystal clear.
If it is not crystal clear, it is because you either did not boil long enough
(large quantities may need to cook longer), or boiled it too hard, or didn't
have a filter that was fine enough. The process can be repeated until the stock
is completely clear.
To clarify butter, melt it over low heat. When it is liquid, spoon off the
clear oil, taking care to leave the milky stuff behind.
|
3409.14 | For *really* clear soup... | SONATA::SADLER | Change for a Flainian Pobble Bead? | Fri Jan 10 1992 10:05 | 11 |
|
The "official" way to clarify a consomme, as practiced in the best kitchens, is
to remove the fat and then strain it several times (as described previously),
then to add lightly beaten egg whites while whisking and heating. The whites
cook and solidify, 'grabbing' the remaining fine particles left after the
straining. When you've got them all you strain the whole lot again and throw
away the (egg+particles).
Always seemed like a lot of trouble to me...
|
3409.15 | please define marinara | SMURF::BENTLEY | | Wed Aug 31 1994 12:40 | 4 |
| Could someone define marinara? How is a marinara sauce different from
a regular red tomato sauce? What makes it a marinara?
Thanks (from a not very good cook whose husband wants to know).
|
3409.16 | no meat | RAGMOP::FARINA | | Wed Aug 31 1994 12:58 | 1 |
| Marinara is totally meatless. --S
|
3409.17 | | NUBOAT::HEBERT | Captain Bligh | Wed Aug 31 1994 13:16 | 5 |
| I don't know if it's the rule, but every marinara sauce I've seen has
been not only meatless, but also totally smooth (no tomato chunks), and
somewhat thinner than "normal" spaghetti sauce (whatever "normal" means).
Art
|
3409.18 | !! | SNOC02::MASCALL | A harp is a nude piano. | Wed Aug 31 1994 19:51 | 5 |
| Marinara has seafood in it!
Sheridan
;^)
|
3409.19 | | OKFINE::KENAH | Every old sock meets an old shoe... | Mon Sep 19 1994 15:57 | 6 |
| No, despite the name, Marinara does not have seafood in it.
Besides, Marinara doesn't mean "seafood," it means "fisherman."
Oh -- by the way -- Carbonara doesn't have charcoal in it, either.
andrew
|
3409.20 | :-P | SNOC02::MASCALL | A harp is a nude piano. | Mon Sep 19 1994 21:05 | 5 |
| But a fisherman's dish would usually have seafood in it, wouldn't it?
~Sheridan~
:^)
|
3409.21 | Oh yeah -- vermicelli really aren't little worms... | OKFINE::KENAH | Every old sock meets an old shoe... | Tue Sep 20 1994 11:08 | 5 |
| >But a fisherman's dish would usually have seafood in it, wouldn't it?
Perhaps. This one doesn't.
andrew
|
3409.22 | | CCAD23::TAN | Weeding my bed of neuroses | Tue Sep 20 1994 18:08 | 2 |
| Perhaps fishermen are so sick of the sight of fish that they'd rather
lamb? Or vegetables to curb the scurvy? :)
|
3409.23 | | NOVA::FISHER | Tay-unned, rey-usted, rey-ady | Wed Sep 21 1994 07:55 | 7 |
| Like: My daughters both worked for MacDonald's and became vegetarians...
One still is.
:-)
ed
|
3409.24 | Fisherman's Spaghetti ? | CURRNT::PRIEST | the first million years are the worst | Wed Sep 21 1994 09:14 | 5 |
| FWIW, I've had Spaghetti Marinara in an Italian restaurant (in Greece
admittedly) and it was spaghetti with a seafood sauce.
Jim
|
3409.25 | | SNOC02::MASCALL | A harp is a nude piano. | Wed Sep 21 1994 21:03 | 5 |
| When I eat marinara at my Italian nearly-mother-in-law's house, it
DEFINITELY has fish in it.
So there.
:)
|
3409.26 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | cuisses de grenouille | Thu Sep 22 1994 08:45 | 1 |
| I always thought authentic marinara had anchovy paste in it.
|
3409.27 | Think about it... | ASDG::HARRIS | Brian Harris | Fri Dec 09 1994 15:24 | 17 |
|
I'm always amazed that people are so naive about ethnic cooking. Do
you suppose that all Italian fishermen use the same recipe to make
pasta sauce? I doubt that they all run to the shelf to consult their
Marcella Hazan for "the" recipe for marinara sauce. Is there *one*
recipe for Meatloaf? Is there *one* recipe for Apple Pie?
Like most regional cuisines, Italian pasta sauces have as many
variations are there are cooks. As suggested, it probably often
contained fish, but I have no doubt that sometimes it was made without
fish. It probably contained whatever was on hand, and whatever the
family liked.
If you re talking about jarred sauces, then that's just some company
chef's interpretation of an average style of a regional sauce.
|