T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2972.1 | DIR/TITLE=GRAPENUT | TYGON::WILDE | why am I not yet a dragon? | Thu Mar 28 1991 16:47 | 8 |
| >My husband wants to have Grape Nut pudding for dessert on Easter. I have
>no idea how to make this.
>
>Anyone have a recipe????
it's in here somewhere - try DIR/TITLE=GRAPENUT and see what you get.
good luck
|
2972.2 | I'll move this later when I find the right note | PENUTS::DDESMAISONS | | Fri Mar 29 1991 09:22 | 30 |
| Here's the corrected recipe -
Grapenut Custard Pudding
Mix together in a bowl and let stand 15 minutes:
2/3 cup grapenuts
1 cup sugar
2 cups milk
Scald:
2 cups milk
In a 1 and 1/2 qt. oven-safe bowl or casserole dish,
beat:
4 eggs
1/2 tsp. salt
dash of nutmeg
Whisk in slowly the scalded milk.
Add:
2 tsp. vanilla
grapenut mixture
Bake at 325 for 50-60 minutes or until center doesn't wiggle.
Cool completely on rack. Chill thoroughly and serve, optionally,
with whipped cream.
Di
|
2972.3 | Scalded milk? | MEMORY::GAGE | | Wed Apr 03 1991 22:23 | 7 |
|
What is scalded milk?? I can only think burnt on the bottom of pan. Or
is it close to boiling?
Recipe sounds good!
Dan
|
2972.4 | They're close | RANGER::PESENTI | Only messages can be dragged | Thu Apr 04 1991 08:45 | 4 |
| The difference between burnt and scalded is about 30 seconds.
I think the spec for scalded milk says to heat it until tiny bubbles appear
at the edge of the surface of the milk. (No relation to Don Ho)
|
2972.5 | Scalded Milk | ACETEK::TIMPSON | Pursuing an untamed Ornithoid | Thu Apr 04 1991 10:02 | 3 |
| Bring the milk just to the brink of a soft boil but do not let it boil.
Steve
|
2972.6 | | XOANAN::STARKEY | | Thu Apr 04 1991 15:48 | 4 |
| Why do we have to scald milk these days?? Is it health or does it cause
the milk to change its "state"?
mikey
|
2972.7 | you usually don't have to scald | TYGON::WILDE | why am I not yet a dragon? | Thu Apr 04 1991 16:53 | 13 |
| > Why do we have to scald milk these days?? Is it health or does it cause
> the milk to change its "state"?
actually, good point. We used to scald milk because we were not necessarily
dealing with pasturized milk. Raw milk should be "cooked" prior to use in
custards, etc. in order for the texture to be as expected - and also as a
double protection from possible health risks..Virtually all milk that a
consumer can get his/her hands on these days is "cooked" (pasturized) and
you don't really have to scald it unless we are making a "stirred" custard.
Milk used in cakes, baked custards, etc. doesn't really have to be scalded.
Older recipes, however, generally call for scalded milk.
Those who buy raw milk....disregard all the above. 8^}
|
2972.8 | Might be cooking time | AKOCOA::THORP | | Tue Apr 09 1991 13:02 | 10 |
| Brand new cook books still call for scalding when using milk to make
rice puddings, bread puddings, etc. I don't believe its for a health
reason as much as it is for cooking time, ie; it will take longer to
bake a pudding if you start with cold milk from the fridge than it will
if the milk is scalded. The longer you bake in the oven to cook the
middle the higher the risk of burning the sides. You can heat milk
faster in a sauce pan on the stove in your microwave than you can in
a casserole in your oven.
Chris
|
2972.9 | yeah, but yeah, but.. | PENUTS::DDESMAISONS | | Tue Apr 09 1991 13:09 | 8 |
|
Gee, doesn't it actually change the flavor too? It certainly
smells different. I can't imagine that if you scalded milk, then
let it cool, it would still taste like a glass of fresh, cold
milk. Am I on drugs?
Di
|
2972.10 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | Mourn for us, oppressed in fear... | Tue Apr 09 1991 16:16 | 2 |
| If you look in the mirror and don't see a fried egg, then you probably
aren't. ;-)
|
2972.11 | honest...no chemical change | TYGON::WILDE | why am I not yet a dragon? | Fri Apr 12 1991 18:42 | 31 |
| re: taste different due to chemical change...
actually, if you chilled it down again (and skimmed the little rubber coating
off the top..8^}), it would taste like milk. There is no "chemical change"
when heating the milk - that's what pasturization is, after all, a process of
mixing it up and heating it...The changes that do occur are:
1) increase in aroma...a standard molecular reaction to the
heating process which makes the aroma of the milk more
noticable....when it's cold, you don't smell much, but it
smells pretty much the same if you can smell it.
2) decrease in live bacteria. The primary reason heating is
recommended.
3) and it gets hot. As mentioned, it is sometimes called for as
a way to speed up cooking. However, the longer cooking required
to heat up the cold milk can also produce a "creamier" textured
pudding when you are working with a starch-based product like rice.
To avoid burning the sides of the pudding:
treat as a baked custard by setting the container
in a larger container to which you then add boiling water to
insulate the delicate pudding. This step is also recommended in
many cookbooks.
Of course, another process that happens when milk is pasturized is that the
cream content of the milk is also stabilized IN THE MILK....it doesn't
separate out...I tend to forget this step because I don't use anything but
skimmed milk.
|
2972.12 | Chemical change when combined with the eggs? | FLUKES::SUTTON | He roams the seas in freedom... | Tue Apr 16 1991 09:00 | 15 |
| I made this stuff over the weekend and it got rave reviews. I had never
heard of it before, but several people at the dinner had and enjoyed
this recipe.
As I was putting it together, the questions about why scald the milk
came to mind. When you add the scalded milk to the beaten egg, I
suppose the heat thickens or partially cooks the egg as the two are
whisked together; just as with Hollandaise sauce, if you add the heated
butter too quickly you end up with scrambled eggs in butter, but if the
ingredients are combined correctly you finish with a thickened product
that you wouldn't have by just combining cold milk and eggs.
Or am I just nuts? (Grapenuts?)
/Harry
|
2972.13 | give that man a cupie doll | PENUTS::DDESMAISONS | | Tue Apr 16 1991 10:04 | 9 |
|
Sounds good to me, Harry. I like it. Have to be able
to justify having scalded all that milk over the years
somehow. 8-).
Diane
BTW, glad you enjoyed it.
|
2972.14 | Question | HOCUS::FCOLLINS | | Tue Apr 16 1991 13:11 | 2 |
| .2 Is that a total of 4 cups of milk. 2 cups as a soaking agent and 2
that are scalded?
|
2972.15 | yuppa | PENUTS::DDESMAISONS | | Tue Apr 16 1991 13:35 | 7 |
|
>>> .2 Is that a total of 4 cups of milk. 2 cups as a soaking agent and 2
>>> that are scalded?
Exactamundo.
|
2972.16 | How come they sunk???? | PARITY::DDAVIS | Long-cool woman in a black dress | Tue Apr 16 1991 15:44 | 8 |
| Great recipe! I made this last week but I had one slight problem. ..
all my grapenuts sunk to the bottom. Now, what did I do wrong??
It tasted great, just the same!
-Dotti.
|
2972.17 | honey, I sunk the grapenuts | PENUTS::DDESMAISONS | | Tue Apr 16 1991 18:09 | 10 |
|
>> Great recipe! I made this last week but I had one slight problem. ..
>> all my grapenuts sunk to the bottom. Now, what did I do wrong??
That's supposed to happen! You must be a great cook. 8-).
Di
|
2972.18 | I think I'll do it again!! | PARITY::DDAVIS | Long-cool woman in a black dress | Wed Apr 17 1991 12:05 | 4 |
|
Awwwwright!!!
|
2972.19 | They will not sink | HOCUS::FCOLLINS | | Wed Apr 17 1991 12:43 | 7 |
| There was on one of the cook shows how raisins, blueberries, etc.
should be added to batters so that they do not sink to the bottom.
I can't remember - anyone else know??
This feels the same as trying to name that tune??????????
Flo
|
2972.20 | Flour Does The Trick | TIMBER::HACHE | Day Destroys the Night | Wed Apr 17 1991 13:12 | 6 |
|
If you coat berries, nuts (and possibly grapenuts) with flour
(put them in a baggie of flour and shake the bag until they are
coated), they don't sink to the bottom of the batter.
dm
|
2972.21 | Flour or sugar the heavy items? | CADSYS::HECTOR::RICHARDSON | | Wed Apr 17 1991 13:13 | 5 |
| I think maybe you flour them, or mix them with sugar. I don't think
either thing would work with grapenuts - they are pretty heavy. I
don't mind them all ending up on the bottom of the custard anyhow.
/Charlotte
|
2972.22 | sink they will | PENUTS::DDESMAISONS | | Wed Apr 17 1991 14:46 | 15 |
|
I could be wrong, but my guess is that you could coat a grapenut
with flour (though I'm not sure exactly how) until you were blue
in the face and it wouldn't float in a custard. Could be fun
trying though, granted.
There's really no shame in having your grapenuts at the bottom
of your custard. This is a naturally occurring phenomenon in
the grapenut custard pudding world, in keeping with the laws of
gravity.
I'm almost sure of it.
8-)
|
2972.23 | yes | POCUS::FCOLLINS | | Wed Apr 17 1991 17:52 | 3 |
| .20 That's it. Thanks - now I can sleep tonight.
Flo
|