T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1774.1 | | PSTJTT::TABER | Who in their right mind...OH! | Tue May 23 1989 15:37 | 16 |
| Well, there's cooking wine as in the horrid stuff sold in grocery stores
that is loaded with salt so people won't drink it (thus the market doesn't
need a liquor license to sell it.) It really doesn't matter how many
calories it has, since you'll probably not eat anything it was used in.
Then there's just plain old wine. If you like it, you pour it into what
you're cooking, and if you don't you pour it down the drain. That's really
the rule in cooking -- if you won't drink it, don't cook with it.
It's probably hard to get a good calorie count for cokked wine, since the
sugar of the grape juice has been converted to alcohol, and the alcohol
evaporates out during the cooking. The remaining grape broth probably
doesn't add a lot of calories, although some wines are sweetened after
fermenting, and you'll get some sugar residue from that.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
1774.2 | a rule of thumb | MYRTLE::HUISH | Life is a Cabernet ... | Tue May 23 1989 23:57 | 22 |
|
> Then there's just plain old wine. If you like it, you pour it into what
>you're cooking, and if you don't you pour it down the drain. That's really
>the rule in cooking -- if you won't drink it, don't cook with it.
I agree, you are tying to add some flavour from the wine into
what you are cooking. If you can't stand to drink the wine, cooking
it is not going to improve its flavour and it wont do anything for
your dish either.
When we cook with wine, we find it is just the excuse we need to
have a nice glass of wine which we may not have bothered to have.
So, as a rule of thumb - if you don't like to drink it, don't cook
with it.
Incidently, day old wine (ie well corked leftovers from the previos
day) are fine but beware of long re-corked stuff - try it first.
Pete
|
1774.3 | substitute | CGVAX2::WEISMAN_E | | Wed May 24 1989 10:15 | 10 |
|
I don't really care for wine. Is there a substitue that can
be used when a recipe calls for it. I have tried a few things
with not much success.
donna
|
1774.4 | What don't you like? | WJO::JEFFRIES | the best is better | Wed May 24 1989 11:53 | 6 |
|
What is it that you don't care for with wine? Is it the flavor, if so
try a different wine. Some times sherry can have a stronger flavor than
some of the white wines. I have been using a white port and find it has
been real good in chicken and shrimp recipes. Also as previously
stated, don't use those cooking wines sold in the supermarket.
|
1774.5 | don't give up on wine yet | RAB::GLANTZ | Mike, DTN 381-1253 | Wed May 24 1989 12:12 | 27 |
| I agree with .-1. If you've been using supermarket cooking wines,
before trying a substitute, try a moderately decent wine. You can buy
suitable California chardonnay or fume blanc for $5 to $6, which may
be comparable to cooking wine.
If it's the alcohol that bothers you, you may not be cooking it long
enough to evaporate it out. I watch that when preparing dinner for
friends who are alcoholics. It doesn't take more than a few minutes,
though, to cook it all out, so I doubt that's your objection.
If you really don't like the flavor of any wines, when the recipe
calls for cooking sherry or white wine, you can substitute chicken,
fish, or veal stock (or bouillon). You may have to cut the salt a bit.
You can even use plain water, but then you may need to add salt. This
substitution will change the flavor of the dish a bit, but of course
that's what you're after.
Believe it or not, another good substitute in some recipes is beer.
When the recipe calls for a strong-flavored wine, like marsala or red
wine, there's nothing you can substitute without really losing the
essence of the recipe. You could try beef stock in place of red wine.
You could also try cognac. Nothing I know of will substitute well for
marsala, though you might get away with some whiskies - rye or bourbon
- and cut the amount in half or third. In any case, you might still
like the result, but the dish won't be the same. You can consider it
your own original creation.
|
1774.6 | There are no "Bad Wines" | GENRAL::SHERWOOD | I would rather be camping | Thu May 25 1989 17:03 | 6 |
| Re: .2-- Pete, try using the "older wines" on your next tossed
salad --in place of wine vinegar-- it is really a tasty treat
when added to a nice safflower oil on mixed or an all green salad
(add herbs etc. to your taste) I have also used "old wines" as part
of a marinade for meats to soak in.. Good stuff!! <DICK>
|
1774.7 | | PSW::WINALSKI | Careful with that VAX, Eugene | Sun Sep 17 1989 21:37 | 5 |
| The calories in dry table wine are almost exclusively from the alcohol, and that
usually evaporates during the cooking process. Thus, I would guess that cooking
wine adds negligible calories to the final dish.
--PSW
|