T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1737.1 | | TBEARS::JOHNSON | | Mon Apr 24 1989 16:05 | 12 |
| Sharon,
I have always tested chicken this way: Cut a slit on top of the breast
in the middle, if the juices run clear, then the chicken is done.
When I do it this way, it is always moist...unless of course I forget
about the chicken in the oven 8-)
I heard that it's safer not to have the poultry and pork be even slightly pink
due to salmonella poisoning risks.
hope this helps
Linda
|
1737.2 | pink it is | SALEM::MEDVECKY | | Tue Apr 25 1989 13:01 | 8 |
| Its perfectly safe to eat chicken which is slightly pink....for
that matter, the same goes for pork......as long as the pork has
reached 160 degrees....which it does when its slightly pink...
The deal about cooking pork until its "done" right thru is an old
wives tale and any good cookbook will tell you the same...
Rick
|
1737.3 | temperature | MCIS2::CORMIER | | Tue Apr 25 1989 13:59 | 5 |
| Your best bet is a meat thermometer. They are relatively inexpensive,
and give you the best idea of when meat or poultry is at the proper
temperature for health and moistness.
|
1737.4 | No pink chicken for me | USMFG::PJEFFRIES | the best is better | Tue Apr 25 1989 14:02 | 6 |
|
It may be an old wives tale, but if you never want me to eat chicken
in your house again, serve me pink chicken. The same goes for pork,
I just don't find it appetizing.
+pat+
|
1737.5 | pop-up thermometers are available | HPSCAD::WHITMAN | Acid rain burns my BASS | Tue Apr 25 1989 14:37 | 7 |
| re .-2
I know I've seen the 'pop-up' thermometers 3 to a package in the
super-markets. Just like the DEC turkey, when the sensor 'pops up' it's done.
(kind of takes some of the fun, suspense, and mystery out of cooking don't it)
Al
|
1737.6 | | PSTJTT::TABER | It offends my freakin' dignity | Tue Apr 25 1989 16:12 | 10 |
| Meat thermometers are pretty hard to use on a boneless chicken breast. You're
talking meat that is only about half-an-inch thick. It would be very difficult
to get an accurate reading.
I've found that properly cooked chicken can be slightly pink. I look to see
that the meat separates into fibers when pulled. (I've developed this test
for doneness by checking the breast meat of whole chickens that were tested
with a thermometer. I can't say it's USDA tested, but it's worked for years
now.)
>>>==>PStJTT
|
1737.7 | | BEING::POSTPISCHIL | Always mount a scratch monkey. | Wed Apr 26 1989 09:45 | 11 |
| Re .2:
> The deal about cooking pork until its "done" right thru is an old
> wives tale and any good cookbook will tell you the same...
Pork is dangerous because pigs are carriers of trichinosis. Most pork
sold today is safe, but there are still occasional cases, and cooking
thoroughly is a preventive measure.
-- edp
|
1737.8 | The pop-up ones seem to go off at too high a temperature | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Wed Apr 26 1989 11:36 | 5 |
| I don't trust those pop-up meat thermometers; they seem to always
result in the meat being overly-well-done (to my taste) - I use a real
meat thermometer. I don't mind my chicken or turkey being a bit pink
in the middle of the thickest portions, and it's much better that way
than overcooked.
|
1737.9 | 24 DAYS???? | POCUS::FCOLLINS | | Wed Apr 26 1989 14:30 | 16 |
| There is so much emphasis on chicken these days - cleaning it thoroughly
and all items that have been used, including your hands, during
preparation that I would hesitate to serve it pink. The meat
thermometer is a good source although as mentioned, difficult with
a chicken cutlet. I believe there is a touch test. If it is firm
to the touch (don't burn your finger) it is done and, of course,
there's always the careful slit. I have found with the pop-up
thermometers that they sometimes pop-up before the chicken/turkey
is done. This has happened when basting the bird and the basting
juices are really hot and land around that area. I usually give a
tug on the leg and if it pulls away and the juices are clear, its done.
Regarding pork, on Madeline Cooks, I believe her last name is Hamer
(spelling), she stated that pork did not need to be cooked to well,
well done if the pork had been previously frozen for 24 days. Yup!
I remember she said exactly 24 days.
|
1737.10 | | PSW::WINALSKI | Careful with that VAX, Eugene | Sun Sep 17 1989 21:00 | 11 |
| The main danger from chicken is salmonella. As long as you get the temperature
throughout the meat to the 160-degree level or above for a significant amount
of time (minutes), you'll kill off any salmonella bacteria and will be OK.
With pork, the danger is encysted trichina worms. These are far more dangerous
and harder to kill off than salmonella. Heat is more effective than cold for
killing them off. It's likely that freezing for 24 days is enough to do the
trick, but I personally wouldn't risk it. Pork needs to be cooked thoroughly.
This doesn't mean you have to turn it into leather, though.
--PSW
|
1737.11 | adequate cooking doesn't prevent all poisoning | VIA::GLANTZ | Mike, DTN 381-1253 | Mon Sep 18 1989 11:05 | 10 |
| Maybe this question should be under another topic on food poisoning
(moderator please feel free to move if so):
I'd heard that with some kinds of food poisoning, such as botulism,
the main problem is caused by toxins which have been produced by the
organism, and that simply killing the organism doesn't make the food
safe to eat. Is this ever the case with salmonella? Or is it always
true that if you kill all the bacteria, the food is then safe? I've
gotten food poisoning from pork which was adequately cooked, but I
don't know what the organism was, though the symptoms were salmonella.
|
1737.12 | No, the problem is bacterial, not a toxin | SSGBPM::KENAH | Haunted by demons who stole my soul | Tue Sep 19 1989 16:43 | 7 |
| According to Taber's Cyclopedic Medical Dictionary:
Salmonellosis -- infestation with bacteria of genus Salmonella.
There are three forms of Salmonella infection: enteric fever
(Ex: thyphoid fever), septicemia, and acute gastroenteritis.
andrew
|
1737.13 | Time/temperature? | HDLITE::BEACH | | Fri Apr 09 1993 14:18 | 6 |
| Approximately how long does it take to cook a chicken breast so that
it's just past the pink stage? What oven temperature is recommended?
By the time I get around to cutting a slit in the chicken, it's usually
too late. :-)
Linda
|
1737.14 | | VMSMKT::KENAH | There are no mistakes in Love... | Fri Apr 09 1993 14:22 | 4 |
| With or without bone? With or without skin? What size?
At 350 F, it's about 20 minutes for a skinless, boneless 6 oz. breast.
Maybe 5 - 7 minutes more for breasts with skin and bones.
|
1737.15 | different time/temps=different stove | SOLVIT::TRUBACZ | | Fri Apr 09 1993 16:26 | 6 |
| Mine's a litle opposite. At 350 F just about 12-15 minutes boneless,
real thin fillets about 5 - 8 minutes
I believe there will different ranges with different types of stoves.
pdt
|
1737.16 | | VMSMKT::KENAH | There are no mistakes in Love... | Mon Apr 12 1993 14:14 | 5 |
| Different times for different stoves -- yup, exactly. You have to
experiment. The easiest thing to do is to undercook -- you can always
cook them a little longer.
andrew
|
1737.17 | microwave is even faster | TNPUBS::STEINHART | Back in the high life again | Wed Apr 14 1993 12:59 | 6 |
| Skinless, boneless breasts cook up well in the microwave.
The_Microwave_Gourmet covers this extensively.
Laura
|