[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference turris::bridge

Title:The Game of Bridge
Moderator:COLLIS::JACKSON
Created:Thu Oct 30 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1969
Total number of notes:14668

1961.0. "MPs" by ROKKON::shr160-231.shr.dec.com::Cohen () Fri May 02 1997 07:27

MPs - late in 1 session final where you've got a chance to win

1. None

S A84, H AQJ65, D5, C QT32

LHO opens:	1s  p 2d 2h
		2d  p 3n

You elect to lead the HA see:
S Q7653, H 4, D Q72, C AKJ9

Trick 1:
HA H4 H3 H2 (partner will give count without an honor)

Lots of matchpoints hang on your next play.

2. Both

S 6, H Q96, D AJT98, C Q986

You open:	 p 1s 2h 4s
		 ?

3. EW

S Q832, H 8743, D AQ3, C T6

LHO opens:	 p 1C  p 1H
		 p 3C  p  ?

4. None

(Posted more for fun than a problem)

S Q543, H Q83, D AJ, C 9732

RHO opens:	2s  p  p  *
		 p 3n

Opening lead is SA and dummy tables:
S 6, H K54, D QT874, C AJ86

Don't you just love your contract!

Trick 1:	SA S6 S7 S3
Trick 2:	ST H4 SJ SQ

Now what?

-------------------------------------------------------------------
I hoped that the KD was offside and that I would get some MPs for 3N 
down one rather than play for the "perfect" Kx of diamond onside. So 
I played DA,DJ. LHO won the KD and played back a club. I went up CA 
dropping the CK! When the smoke clear I claimed 4NT. (Yes I could 
have been held to 3NT) I can't complain about bad luck at cards for a 
month. Here was the full layout

		S 6
		H K54
		D QT874
		C AJ86
S AT				S KJ9872
H QT9				H J762
D K952				D 63
C QT54				C K
		S Q543
		H A83
		D AJ
		C 9732

ps - Jay and I did manage to win the NH State Open Pairs. Boards 1 
and 3 were 2 of only 3 boards that we got "wrong" in the finals. In 
the first qualifying session, we had what was probably the best 
section session that I've ever had. Our game was 75% and the worst 
boards that we had were two 3's on a 4 average.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1961.1my guessesGAAS::BRAUCHERAnd nothing else mattersFri May 02 1997 09:2614
    
    (1)  I'll try SA.  I think my RHO has 11 tricks, possibly 12, as
       I will be horribly squeezed on the run of the diamonds.  Also,
       if partner has anything, it's spades.  In fact, at Imps, you
       might try a low spade, trying for 4 tricks in the suit.  But
       I'm not trying to beat this at matchpoints.
    
    (2)  Pass.  I refuse to be buffaloed.  They didn't make this yet.
    
    (3)  3NT.  Might need some luck.  Or could be cold.
    
    (4)  funny.
    
     bb
1961.2my guessesESOSRV::BATORFri May 02 1997 09:3723
    Bob,
    
      Congratulations to you and Jay.
    
    1.)  I lead SA.  RHO did not support them, and they're pretty weak.
       It's possible we can get some tricks here.
    
    2.)  I bid 5H. I think I have the right stuff. RHO is obviously
        bidding on shape and some spades to jump to 4S.  I have a spade
       control, heart support, and a diamond suit that may bring in tricks.
       Let them have the last guess.  Even if 4S is going down, we may
       not get enough.
    
    
    3.)  3N.  Partner may have 6+ running clubs and a side Ace minimum
        and this may roll.  Or it may be harder or easier.  In any
        event, it's a reasonable bid at this point.  Maybe they won't lead
        the hearts because of my 1H bid.
    
    4.)  funny
    
    
    dick
1961.3Congrats...CADSYS::GROSSThe bug stops hereFri May 02 1997 10:419
Problem 1: I've been playing too much imps. I'm inclined to switch
to the Sx.

Problems 2 & 3: I haven't a clue. It might come down to knowing
who the opponent is.

Problem 4: The QH morphs into the AH.

Dave
1961.4Well done!BULMER::KABLESHKOVFri May 02 1997 12:038
    1. What was LHO's 2nd bid? If 3C, then decl might have a weak
       distrib.hand with 10 red cards and no S hon. Then Sx continuation
       is best for -1.
    2. Depends on overcalling strength. Here, in MP even vul, 2H may not
       be on opening hand, and 5H is best. Else, pass.
    3. Are you doing well so far? If so, then P, as 3N is IMPs bid.
       Else 3N and hope. One of the majors is not covered; if H, then
       H lead will cost you dear.
1961.5I remember some of these hands...DAVIDB::DMILLERThis bug fix broke what???????Fri May 02 1997 16:2123
1.	The opponents bid game, and I have a opening hand.  I don't
	expect partner to have an honor anywhere.  We're going to lose
	six diamond tricks, plus four club tricks if declarer takes
	some deep finesses.  The HK makes 11 tricks, and that should
	be it.

	Lead HQ, forcing out declarer's HK.  I'll take any hearts I
	can still hold onto when I'm finally in with the SA.  Underleading
	SA hoping to find partner with more than Jxxx is lunacy, and may
	give the opps 12 tricks.

	(Of course, I was defending 5D making, which was good for us
	 since 3N making 5 scores a lot better for the opponents)

2.	At favorable, I might venture 5H, but not here.  Pass.

3.	3N.  Hope the opps believed my heart bid and don't lead one.

4.	Yeah, I wondered what I would do if it went 2S-P-P-X-P-?.
	Fortunately, it was passed out at our table and I didn't
	have to worry about it.  Playing Lebensohl, I would have bid
	3C over the double, showing values, and wait for partner to
	ask for a stopper with 3S if he has more than a balancing double.
1961.6Nice job!SUBSYS::SENGUPTAShekhar Sengupta DTN 237-6785Fri May 02 1997 16:5916
    Congratulations Bob and Jay.
    
    1) I'd have started with the HQ (and possibly given up 9 tricks off the
       top - but then I didn't know about dummy's club holding. To beat
       this hand we'll need two spade leads through dummy, so I guess
       judging by your comment about lots of MPs that is what I would
       suggest now. At the table, I would like to think that I'd follow
       BB's reasoning of minimizing the damage and lead SA.
    
    2) Under normal circumstances, pass. Double if I needed a top.
    
    3) 3N
    
    4) Luck combined with skill is all you need to win!
    
    Shekhar
1961.7closer than it looks, though I'd still cash SA...GAAS::BRAUCHERAnd nothing else mattersMon May 05 1997 10:5019
    
      On (1), I agree that declarer is quite likely holding major kings
     and a suit of diamonds.  But in order for the HQ continuation to
     hold him to four, he has to have only 5 diamonds.  If he has 6, your
     play doesn't matter, nor does he need to take a deep club finesse.
     What are your 5 discards ?  However, you still don't lose the spade
     ace.  You WILL lose the spade ace if declarer has seven diamonds.  In
     fact, you'll wind up discarding it in desperation.  If declarer has
     Jx Kx AKxxxxx xx, you can probably stop his making 6, by throwing
     BOTH your aces, if you keep your wits about you.  Anyway, pard with
     Kxx xxxxx xx xxx, might have raised.  K K10xx AKJxx xxx gets held to
     four only by the heart continuation, and gives partner a more likely
     Jxxx xxx xxxx xx.  But note that if declarer had J K10xx AKJxx xxx,
     the spade ace is best once again, holding him to three.
    
      By the way, the opening lead is also interesting, but the heart ace
     is certainly reasonable.
    
      bb