[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference turris::bridge

Title:The Game of Bridge
Moderator:COLLIS::JACKSON
Created:Thu Oct 30 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1969
Total number of notes:14668

1953.0. "A Very Unusual Hand" by DAVIDB::DMILLER (This bug fix broke what???????) Fri Mar 28 1997 14:55

	An actual deal that game up today at lunch (ie, it wasn't one of
	our "ghoulies", as JK calls them - where we stack the 4 sorted hands
	after a pass-out, cut once, and deal 4-5-4 around the table)

	I held, J-x-AKQxxx-AK9xx with LHO dealing, and the auction starting
	P-P-1D-? to me.  If you can pass in tempo, it will proceed P-X-1H-?
	back to you.  Would you have passed before, and if so, what do you
	bid now, otherwise what would you have bid over 1D?

	If 2N over 1D was for the rounded suits, would 4N be minors?

	-Dave
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1953.1Bid 2C earlySUBSYS::SENGUPTAShekhar Sengupta DTN 237-6785Fri Mar 28 1997 16:0823
    I would have bid 2C on my first turn. That gives me more chances to
    uncover a fit than an initial pass. After partner's double, I
    assume that RHO's hand is more likely to be 3 or 4 diamonds and 4
    hearts rather than a strong hand with reversing values, which he
    chose not to show because of LHO's pass.
    
    To discover the almost certain club fit, I'll keep cue bidding until
    partner says clubs and then bid Blackwood.
    
    Had I bid clubs originally, I would have had more time to explore
    the general strength of partner's hand, discover the fit and play
    the hand in 3N, 5C or 6C
    
    A hand like this came up last night where I held:
    
    AKQxx-xxx-QJx-Qx	LHO 	Partner	RHO	Me
    			1C	P    	1H 	1S
    			5H(!)	6H(!!)	P	6S(Gulp)
    			AP. With the Ace of Hearts led, partner tabled:
    Jxxx-void-Axx-AKxxxx    7S would have been the winning bid but I 
    			    didn't have the opportunity to find out!
    
    
1953.2start by cueing 2H to create a game force, then bid minimum minors.GAAS::BRAUCHERAnd nothing else mattersMon Mar 31 1997 09:3212
  I also dislike the pass of 1D.  You aren't getting a penalty with this
 hand - it's a mirage.  If 1D is Precision or some such, partner will be
 aware of it.  But I have many friends who pass, so let's assume I did.

  Diamond bids are natural over 1H - 2H is the cue.  Since I'm forcing to
 game at least, I'd cue-bid 2H, planning to make minimum bids thereafter.

  Partner knows I have diamonds as soon as I do this, since otherwise my
 pass makes no sense.

  bb
1953.32C/1DBULMER::KABLESHKOVTue Apr 01 1997 04:562
    Yes, I'd bid 2C/1D too, ending in 3N or 5C or even 5D (depending on
    whether 1D was genine or conventional). Now I would bid 2H/1H.
1953.45C is correct place, if you can get thereDAVIDB::DMILLERThis bug fix broke what???????Tue Apr 01 1997 17:0524
    Opps were playing SA/5CM, so 1D was natural.
    
    We have ways to get in both minors after the opps open a minor, but
    none of them applied at my first opportunity to bid.  I didn't expect
    1D to be passed out with me holding 1-1 in the majors, so I hoped I'd
    be able to show both minors on my next bid.
    
    Over RHO's 1H, I decided that our methods weren't too well defined
    after a "trap" pass.  I went with 2N as the best all around bid.  If
    partner thought it was natural, he could raise to 3N with a decent
    balancing hand.  If he thought it was unusual, I've got that too!
    
    Partner passed, holding Txxx-KQx-x-QJxxx, feeling he had bid his hand
    to the limit with his balancing action.   A heart to the Ace, and a
    heart continuation left me with 12 tricks when RHO pitched a diamond
    from Txxx as I ran clubs.  3N can go down if the opps figure out how to
    unscramble their 4 spade tricks to go along with the HA.  5C is stone
    cold, requiring a single diamond ruff to set up the suit.
    
    			Txxx-KQx-x-QJxxx
    	Qxxx-Jxxxx-Jx-xx		AKxx-Axxx-Txxx-x
    			J-x-AKQxxx-AKxxx
    
    -Dave
1953.5Get away with a murder at lunch...BULMER::KABLESHKOVWed Apr 02 1997 04:264
    Apart from the 'lunch-time' factor, both E's 1D and N's X are
    very questionable in aggregate (IMPs) or rubber scoring. In the
    latter case this could be justified only if E-W had 80+ below
    the line.