| Title: | The Game of Bridge |
| Moderator: | COLLIS::JACKSON |
| Created: | Thu Oct 30 1986 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 1969 |
| Total number of notes: | 14668 |
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1919.1 | 2S | GAAS::BRAUCHER | Champagne Supernova | Tue Jan 21 1997 08:25 | 8 |
| 1919.2 | 2S. | CADSYS::GROSS | The bug stops here | Tue Jan 21 1997 09:40 | 5 |
| 1919.3 | Toss your lucky coin | BULMER::KABLESHKOV | Tue Jan 21 1997 11:37 | 5 | |
| 1919.4 | Is 2S constructive/foward going or is it drop-dead? | DAVIDB::DMILLER | This bug fix broke what??????? | Tue Jan 21 1997 14:52 | 25 |
| 1919.5 | weak with spades | GAAS::BRAUCHER | Champagne Supernova | Wed Jan 22 1997 08:18 | 10 |
| 1919.6 | Partial layout | DAVIDB::DMILLER | This bug fix broke what??????? | Thu Jan 23 1997 13:09 | 29 |
| 1919.7 | 150, mebbe 200 ? | GAAS::BRAUCHER | Champagne Supernova | Thu Jan 23 1997 13:50 | 6 |
| 1919.8 | True, 1N better than 2C | BULMER::KABLESHKOV | Fri Jan 24 1997 04:28 | 7 | |
Agree that 1N is far better than 2C. Now, even with 8-9 HCP
and 5-3-3-2 or 5-4-2-2 you'd give D-pref and miss 3N or 4H game.
Alternatively, he could have forced himself to reverse, ie bid
2H instead of 2C. Dont know what this would lead to, though.
Here 4CM and weak NT makes it easy to open 1H on 1-4-4-4,
intending to rebid 1N/1S.
| |||||