| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 262.1 | | SHAWB1::WATTY::WATTERSONP | You looking at me - PAL !! | Tue Sep 29 1992 15:01 | 11 |
|
I'll go for
1- Red Rum
2- Nijinski
3- Shergar
But seriously - no more predictions PLEASE !!!!
Paul
|
| 262.2 | | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Tue Sep 29 1992 15:02 | 6 |
| Gary,
please write-lock, this is the football notes not a betting office. We can do
without this crap.
T_
|
| 262.3 | | PEKING::NAGLEJ | | Tue Sep 29 1992 15:34 | 6 |
|
Oooooh Ton, hit me, hit me, tell it how it is. I jus' love
aggressive Dutchmen.
JN. )
|
| 262.4 | SUPER BLUES | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Tue Sep 29 1992 15:50 | 13 |
| <<< Note 262.3 by PEKING::NAGLEJ >>>
>> Oooooh Ton, hit me, hit me, tell it how it is. I jus' love
>> aggressive Dutchmen.
>> JN. )
Specially when they support Chelsea right?!?!?!??!?!
T_
|
| 262.6 | | UTROP1::JANSEN | Reading Blondes have more fun | Tue Sep 29 1992 16:46 | 11 |
| rep -1
The problem here DH is that we've got two prediction topics in this conference
and we all feel that's more then enough, now you just start two more prediction
topics (in the Dutch League topic & this topic) and we don't need that.
If you want to predict join the international predictions topic at 168 and
don't mess up the rest of the notes file 'cause football is our main intrest
not some Dutch man who wants to know if his betting is done right.
T_
|
| 262.8 | SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSPPPPPPPPPPPPPAAAAAAAAAAAACCCCCCCCEEEEEEEEE | ISEPUB::CHAMPOLLION | Can-tas-tic | Tue Sep 29 1992 17:22 | 9 |
| OK OK calm down all of you. You are all right in what you are saying.
You can discuss anything football-related but we are trying to save
some disk space. We had to move out from several nodes already.
Now, if our student friend wants to bet, he can do so using VAXmail and get
together with whoever is interested. He can also take part in the International
Predictions topic of course.
�JF?
|
| 262.10 | Are we cocky or what? | ESOA11::PILATON | Nick Pilato DECUS IM&T Supervisor | Tue Sep 29 1992 18:53 | 4 |
| Sorry to say.... but this guy sounds too cocky. I guess it's just the
way he strikes his keys. But, then again, it's just my opinion.
NP
|
| 262.12 | From the Orange Book | AKOCOA::KNIPSTEIN | | Wed Sep 30 1992 15:26 | 15 |
| I don't know how much different the company policies are in Europe, but
here in the U.S. discussion of gambling on the network is a violation
of company policy. This conference could be shut down and security
would be visiting the parties involved.
According to the Personnel Policies Manual (Orangebook) it is against
company policy to -
"o Participate in any form of illegal gaming or gambling on Company
or customer property."
Granted, participation in such activities may take place, but given the
current climate, I sure wouldn't do so in a public forum like this.
Steve
|
| 262.13 | | GALVIA::SPAIN | There's always the U.S. | Wed Sep 30 1992 16:37 | 7 |
|
Re -1, Thanks Steve. I've re-read the previous notes and decided to
set some of them hidden. While nobody is actually gambling in here
there are references to gambling and advertising forms of gambling.
I think it's better to play safe in the current climate.
Gary.
|
| 262.14 | SORRY SORRY SORRY | ELIS::GEELEN | | Wed Sep 30 1992 16:53 | 15 |
| !!!!!!!!!!!! SORRY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I didn't know the company policies were that discussion of gambling on
the network is a violation of company policy.
> According to the Personnel Policies Manual (Orangebook) it is
> against company policy to -
> "o Participate in any form of illegal gaming or gambling on Company
> or customer property."
I'm only a student employee for a six month period, so I was not aware
of all this.
I hope you can forgive me !
|
| 262.15 | | XSTACY::KMCGRATH | Long road, patient donkey | Wed Sep 30 1992 19:28 | 1 |
| Just work this weekend and all is forgiven!
|