T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
234.1 | and quite right too | SEDSWS::WILLMOTT | | Fri Jun 19 1992 11:26 | 23 |
|
Hold it......
news flash just in from Sweden......uefa have decided that Scotland
although finishing 5th ?? have infact morally won the tournament
for being just outstandingly brave and err outstanding brave and for
err.. for scoring more goals than England who now have to change their
name to Donkeybollocks forever more......extraordinary....
..oh and whats this...it looks like England are going to have to give
BACK the last two triple-crown victories and forfeit the semi-final
win against Scotland...which also means another moral victory, this
time in the Rugby, because it would have meant an open flowing final
with Scotland winning 71-70...
..oh and another report in from Beirut it's looks like English
fans have gone on the rampage joining up with she-ite militia spreading
mayhem with small-arms and rocket launchers...typical english..
Yawn
|
234.2 | boo-hoo | MADBAS::DSMITH | ONE THOMAS BROLIN... | Fri Jun 19 1992 11:46 | 9 |
|
re last
What's this, having to return to the rugby now to try and boost your
ego.
ps You were crap and boring in that as well :-) :-)
pps Lighten up.
|
234.3 | I can't get much lighter | SEDSWS::WILLMOTT | | Fri Jun 19 1992 12:02 | 8 |
|
:v)
how's that
|
234.4 | | HAM::SCHARNBERG | Seid umschlungen, Millionen | Fri Jun 19 1992 14:26 | 13 |
|
re Basenote
Apart from few exceptions, the English noters have shown to be good
losers.
Being a good winner is as hard.
Rgds,
Heiko
|
234.5 | Successful failures? | SUBURB::INV_LIBRARY | Who hell he?!? | Fri Jun 19 1992 14:36 | 10 |
|
Hmmmm,
England and Scotland squabbling over who did better in Sweden is a bit
like Everton and Spurs fans arguing who was more successful in the
first division last season.
The answer, of course, is that both failed, only England more so.
jeff
|
234.6 | | IOSG::PAGED | Quayle: The original Mr potatoe head | Fri Jun 19 1992 14:56 | 6 |
| Moreso meaning, they played without guts,mostly without a clue
and were genuinely poor. Whereas Scotland went on the rampage,
thrilled the fans,gained respect from their opponents and
showed genuine class.
|
234.7 | You will listen to the Donkeyhype press... | IRNBRU::SHIELDS | Press KP7 for a frontal lobotomy | Fri Jun 19 1992 14:56 | 28 |
| The point of this note is to remind all the FEB's and their little
press men how Scotland were only therr to make up the numbers, exit having
won no games and scoring no goals. Meanwhile Donkeyhype UTD would
sweep to victory "reminiscent of the great 1966 blah blah chunder"
How often do you hear that from an English commentator during an
English international be it fitba, horsejumping, tiddlywinks .... !
To exit the tournament from the group of certain death after being
narrowly defeated the European & World champs and going down in
history as the only team to ever beat the CIS ( has a goood ring to it
that one) and to finish 5th is a great achievment for a small nation.
At time like this I'm reminded of Des Lynam flashing up the England's
group table and how it would finish if the half time scores remained.
Absolutley priceless to think about it now.
We are justifyably proud of our achievement even if it only merits a 10
second slot after the Holland Germany game on the 10 o'clock news.
Imagine the hour long special extended, sattelite linkup , brown nose
Lineker news show if Donkeyhype had achieved what we ahd done. If the
English press are not going to celebrate it WE ARE !!
Gloating at the Donkey's come naturally at time like these, its part of
the game....
...One Tomas Brolin, there's only one.....
|
234.8 | | SUBURB::INV_LIBRARY | Who hell he?!? | Fri Jun 19 1992 14:59 | 12 |
|
re .6
> Moreso meaning, they played without guts,mostly without a clue
> and were genuinely poor. Whereas Scotland went on the rampage,
> thrilled the fans,gained respect from their opponents and
> showed genuine class.
Er, yes, but they still failed.
jeff
|
234.9 | | IOSG::PAGED | Quayle: The original Mr potatoe head | Fri Jun 19 1992 15:16 | 1 |
| Er, yes but they also won a game.
|
234.10 | Two own goals and a pen! 8^P | FORTY2::ETHERIDGE | Gammeroosh! | Fri Jun 19 1992 16:08 | 1 |
| Er,.. (yawn)
|
234.11 | Be glorious in defeat and gloat in victory | IRNBRU::SHIELDS | Press KP7 for a frontal lobotomy | Fri Jun 19 1992 16:33 | 8 |
| I fluke shin, a bent crossbar, no wins and first home. All from the
group that either didny have to qualify or Donkeyhype had beaten them 2
months earlier.
How early do yo think they will be eliminated from the next
championship, my guess in 3 years.
Er yawn, chunder, weep, drawing board
|
234.12 | Entertainment value | AYOV27::MRENNISON | Think it over Creep | Fri Jun 19 1992 17:07 | 10 |
|
FWIW Scotland's fans were entertained watching their team play against
the World Champions, the European champions and the Runners_up in the
last Euro Championships.
England might have had less attractive opponents, but it doesn't excuse
the lack of entertainment in their games.
Mark
|
234.13 | | SUBURB::INV_LIBRARY | Who hell he?!? | Fri Jun 19 1992 17:23 | 12 |
|
Look, this is all getting just a little bit ridiculous. I don't think
anyone is likely to dispute that England were dismal and almost
certainly the worst team in the tournament; what I find a little harder
to accept is that Scotland were an outstanding success and came home
more than satisfied with their achievements. Surely they went to Sweden
at least believing they could reach the semis; true enough, they did
not have much luck against Holland and Germany, but the simple fact is
that they didn't get past the first round. How that can be called a
"successful" tournament is beyond me.
jeff
|
234.14 | Very entertaining on a Freyder | FORTY2::ETHERIDGE | Gammeroosh! | Fri Jun 19 1992 17:24 | 6 |
| re .11 .12
zzzZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ, see that line race out. Much flapping of
gills. Super stuff.
Ian.
|
234.15 | | MARVIN::MORRELL | Hmmmmmm...... | Wed Aug 16 1995 12:24 | 5 |
| Is the Scotland game on TV tonight??
Cheers,
Rick.
|
234.16 | -1 | MOVIES::MCATEER | Paul McAteer | Wed Aug 16 1995 12:46 | 3 |
| The SFA have said that the game will not be on telly. However this may be a ploy
to ensure that the tickets are all sold although I don't think so.
|
234.17 | | CHEFS::STRATFORDS | Everybody was a Boxer | Wed Aug 16 1995 12:48 | 5 |
| Apparently, there are still 10,000 tickets left. Hampden only has a
capacity of 37,000 (?) so its some national stadium, eh? I s'pose its
what they deserve. Crap team, crap ground.
Stuart
|
234.18 | Why are we in this note ? | AYOV29::MTHEODORESON | It's grim up north | Wed Aug 16 1995 13:00 | 18 |
|
There you go again Stuart spoiling for a fight. It said on the
radio last night that there were only 2000 tickets left. The match
highlights will be on late btw. Hampden is a very nice ground and will
be even better in the Spring when they demolish the old main stand and
put up a spanking new one increasing the capacity to around 50,000.
We could say that the only way your disgusting mob could get into
this competition would be to host the tournament but it's a cheap shot.
Oh what the hell, we'll say it anyway ...
And also are you going to return the 1966 World Cup to West Germany
now that it has been clinically proven that you cheated ?
Malc.
Cryptic PS: I think the Everton bid has succeeded ...
|
234.19 | | CHEFS::STRATFORDS | Everybody was a Boxer | Wed Aug 16 1995 14:42 | 10 |
| Malc,
Moi? Argumentative? You mistake me for someone else...
The 10,000 figure was a quote from Jim Whossisname, the Secretary of
the SFA.
As for handing back the World Cup, only if Argentina do for 1986...
Stuart
|