| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 140.1 | surely you jest | DECWET::SDY | Steven D. Yee | Tue Jun 25 1996 21:23 | 9 |
| 140.2 | re: Java for OVMS | TLE::JCC | | Wed Jun 26 1996 06:36 | 5 |
| 140.3 | Ask Sue Denham | GYRO::eps1.zko.dec.com::nozell | [email protected] | Wed Jun 26 1996 10:05 | 7 |
| 140.4 | | DECWET::SDY | Steven D. Yee | Wed Jun 26 1996 12:04 | 5 |
| 140.5 | Ask them | GYRO::eps1.zko.dec.com::nozell | [email protected] | Fri Jun 28 1996 15:00 | 4 |
| 140.6 | | FBEDEV::KYZIVAT | Paul Kyzivat | Fri Jun 28 1996 17:06 | 1 |
| 140.7 | Our strategy is.... | OSLLAV::MARTINR_P | Advice: Say nothing often... | Tue Jul 02 1996 05:05 | 10 |
| 140.8 | | KOALA::CIOT | | Tue Jul 02 1996 13:32 | 86 |
| 140.9 | Ask Tony Schofield | GYRO::eps1.zko.dec.com::nozell | [email protected] | Wed Jul 03 1996 14:39 | 12 |
| 140.10 | And the answer is (or was)...? | NYOSS1::GOODMAN | I see you shiver with antici.........pation! | Fri Sep 27 1996 12:55 | 0 |
| 140.11 | http://ibgzko.zko.dec.com/nozell/ibg-interest/hypermail/0414.html | GYRO::eps1.zko.dec.com::nozell | Marc Nozell (http://ibgzko.zko.dec.com/nozell) | Mon Sep 30 1996 09:34 | 31 |
| 140.12 | so Netscape gets to use the VM? | COOKIE::MARTIN | Life is tradeoffs | Tue Nov 19 1996 13:38 | 6 |
| 140.13 | Yes, Java for Netscape | PEACHS::HAZZARD | | Wed Nov 20 1996 07:50 | 9 |
| 140.14 | | STAR::BLAKE | OpenVMS Engineering | Wed Nov 20 1996 13:32 | 5 |
| 140.15 | thanks man | COOKIE::MARTIN | Life is tradeoffs | Wed Nov 20 1996 16:49 | 3 |
| 140.16 | Java *application* support built into OpenVMS? | CPEEDY::COOK | Just say NO to that AccViO! - Java!!! | Wed Apr 02 1997 15:57 | 38 |
|
Here's what I'd like to see get implemented on OpenVMS in
regard to Java support:
Built in 'runtime' support for Java *applications*
--------------------------------------------------
o An implementation of the JVM that ships as part of OpenVMS
(sort of analogous to the fact that the C-runtime ships as part
of OpenVMS to support C-language-based applications).
o The DCL-command '$ Java' would presumably also be defined
in the DCL tables to support invoking .class Java applications.
o If possible, an additional function might be to also support
the execution of Java-applications that were packaged into
a .EXE form (as distinct from the .class form). While this
form would then not be architecture neutral, it would presumably
have better startup/execution performance. (Tools to accomplish
this are already becoming available from other companies
targeting other platforms/OSes.)
o etc.
The goal of such software would be so that OpenVMS layered products
could start using Java and shipping some of their components as
Java applications. (Note: I'm referring to Java *applications*...
*not* to Java Applets / HTML-based Java.)
Are there any plans along these lines in the works?
Thanks...
Dave
|
| 140.17 | current plans | STAR::BLAKE | OpenVMS Engineering | Thu Apr 03 1997 08:40 | 34 |
| > o An implementation of the JVM that ships as part of OpenVMS
> (sort of analogous to the fact that the C-runtime ships as part
> of OpenVMS to support C-language-based applications).
Its being worked on. Expect to see a beta within a couple of months or so.
> o The DCL-command '$ Java' would presumably also be defined
> in the DCL tables to support invoking .class Java applications.
Whether its defined in DCLTABLES or invoked via a foreign command is
undecided at this point.
> o If possible, an additional function might be to also support
> the execution of Java-applications that were packaged into
> a .EXE form (as distinct from the .class form). While this
> form would then not be architecture neutral, it would presumably
> have better startup/execution performance. (Tools to accomplish
> this are already becoming available from other companies
> targeting other platforms/OSes.)
The top priority is to get the JDK (including a just-in-time compiler) on
OpenVMS. Native compilers are being talked about but won't be a part of the
initial offering.
> The goal of such software would be so that OpenVMS layered products
> could start using Java and shipping some of their components as
> Java applications. (Note: I'm referring to Java *applications*...
> *not* to Java Applets / HTML-based Java.)
>
> Are there any plans along these lines in the works?
The plans are to ship Java as part of the O/S once its ready.
Colin.
|