| Title: | Welcome to TUXEDO |
| Moderator: | MICROW::HERRLICH |
| Created: | Wed Dec 07 1994 |
| Last Modified: | Wed May 21 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 153 |
| Total number of notes: | 421 |
Our customer will use TxRPC in a configuration with Digital Unix servers and Windows 95 clients. Having to provide some performance tuning guidelines I did not find any performance info in the "Tuxedo TxRPC Guide". 1/ I would like to know if load balancing is usable with TxRPC. It seems to me that load balancing cannot be used with TxRPC because TxRPC services are advertised at interface level and not at routine level. So PRIO service parameter cannot be used in UBBCONFIG, and LDBAL = Y, in RESOURCES section, might not be of any use also. Am I wrong ? 2/ Does data compression apply the same way when using TxRPC ? So could we benefit from the setting of TMCMPLIMIT, in MACHINES section, (and even TMNETLOAD) ? Thanks for any hints... Michel Saez. Annecy, France
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 143.1 | Hmmm, TxRPC you say... | SAWA::STEFANOWICZ | Artur Stefanowicz, DB & TP Grp | Fri Mar 07 1997 06:30 | 15 |
Our customer had simmilar questions. Basicly, all such
features as load-balancing and compression should work.
We will further work on that and will try to give you
exact answer.
The problem is that there are no real customers for Tuxedo
TxRPC, as far as I know from BEA. Many customers are
evaluating product without production roll-out.
In our case we discouraged our customer from using TxRPC,
as it seems it will not be BEA 'mainstream' direction.
This situation is as with our DECdtm XA interface. It exists,
but who uses it, and who supports it?
Anyway, we'll work on that further, if this is crucial for
you.
Best,
Artur
| |||||