T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1076.1 | Rolex Explorer I | HANDVC::STEVELIU | | Mon Dec 23 1996 03:47 | 10 |
1076.2 | Nice watch | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Mon Dec 23 1996 10:18 | 13 |
1076.3 | the Rolex bubbleback | HANDVC::STEVELIU | | Mon Dec 30 1996 04:06 | 15 |
1076.4 | | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Mon Dec 30 1996 08:50 | 17 |
1076.5 | Other notable Rolex | HANDVC::STEVELIU | | Thu Jan 02 1997 01:37 | 17 |
1076.6 | Rolex is OK,but there are better watches | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Thu Jan 02 1997 08:01 | 23 |
1076.7 | Best $200 I ever spent.. | MPGS::OBRIEN | | Thu Jan 02 1997 11:46 | 7 |
1076.8 | Oyster-Perpetual=$700-$1200 these days | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Thu Jan 02 1997 15:05 | 12 |
1076.9 | Rolex, PP and VC | HANDVC::STEVELIU | | Mon Jan 06 1997 22:02 | 17 |
1076.10 | | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Tue Jan 07 1997 09:35 | 19 |
1076.11 | Bubble-back ? | MPGS::OBRIEN | | Tue Jan 07 1997 11:44 | 11 |
1076.12 | | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Tue Jan 07 1997 12:02 | 27 |
1076.13 | more Rolex ... | HANDVC::STEVELIU | | Wed Jan 08 1997 01:53 | 22 |
1076.14 | Your Right | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Wed Jan 08 1997 13:31 | 18 |
1076.15 | the BB details ... | HANDVC::STEVELIU | | Wed Jan 08 1997 22:05 | 29 |
1076.16 | Aircraft Clock ID | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Fri Jan 10 1997 09:09 | 43 |
1076.17 | Clock is old ... | HANDVC::STEVELIU | | Sun Jan 12 1997 22:31 | 20 |
1076.18 | Accurate to the second,so far. | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Mon Jan 13 1997 08:41 | 18 |
1076.19 | Professional watches | HANDVC::STEVELIU | | Tue Jan 14 1997 02:07 | 19 |
1076.20 | Navitimers are neat! | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Tue Jan 14 1997 08:34 | 12 |
1076.21 | Longines was(is ?) good | HANDVC::STEVELIU | | Tue Jan 14 1997 21:01 | 10 |
1076.22 | Longines | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Wed Jan 15 1997 08:05 | 12 |
1076.23 | Acutron worth | POWDML::MAY_B | Its like the same, only different | Wed Jan 15 1997 08:25 | 9 |
1076.24 | Accutrons | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Wed Jan 15 1997 09:01 | 13 |
1076.25 | The "Tuning Fork" | HANDVC::STEVELIU | | Wed Jan 15 1997 22:19 | 13 |
1076.26 | Swiss watches,are my favorite. | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Thu Jan 16 1997 08:35 | 10 |
1076.27 | Antiques Roadshow | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Thu Jan 16 1997 11:13 | 11 |
1076.28 | | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Thu Jan 16 1997 14:47 | 14 |
1076.29 | what's about Swatch ? | HANDVC::STEVELIU | | Fri Jan 17 1997 02:49 | 10 |
1076.30 | | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Fri Jan 17 1997 08:06 | 20 |
1076.31 | Yikes! | MPGS::OBRIEN | | Fri Jan 17 1997 11:44 | 11 |
1076.32 | To Rebuild or Replace?? | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Fri Jan 17 1997 12:45 | 14 |
1076.33 | which one is on your favor ? | HANDVC::STEVELIU | | Mon Jan 20 1997 02:28 | 13 |
1076.34 | GMT MASTER II | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Tue Jan 21 1997 07:55 | 9 |
1076.35 | Man, it's hard to choose ! | HANDVC::STEVELIU | | Wed Jan 22 1997 04:40 | 14 |
1076.36 | Seiko Mechanical Auto/Chrono where to start? | 270WIN::SOELLNER | | Wed Jan 22 1997 11:58 | 23 |
1076.37 | | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Wed Jan 22 1997 12:16 | 22 |
1076.38 | Wrist Watch collectibles | 270WIN::SOELLNER | | Wed Jan 22 1997 13:14 | 22 |
1076.39 | | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Wed Jan 22 1997 13:57 | 34 |
1076.40 | Wrist Watch collectibles | 270WIN::SOELLNER | | Wed Jan 22 1997 14:48 | 18 |
1076.41 | | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Wed Jan 22 1997 15:33 | 13 |
1076.42 | can you identify this watch ? | HANDVC::STEVELIU | | Mon Jan 27 1997 03:12 | 13 |
|
I have come across a very good looking watch and is running well.
On the dial it is marked with this label "peerless".
The watch looks like a small pocket watch but meant to be a wrist
watch. It is made of 925 silver and with a procelain dial marked
with latin numeros and dark bluish watch hands.
Anyone have any idea on what that "peerless" come from ?
sl.
|
1076.43 | | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Mon Jan 27 1997 12:09 | 20 |
|
Hi,
The name is vaguely familiar,but the name on the face,has little to do
with the quality of the watch. What are the markings on the movement.
For instance,I saw a small watch,with the brand name NOREXA,on the
face,but the movement was labled Valjoux,which made it a high quality
movement in a no-name case. Semdom does the name on the face really
mean anything,there are a few which still make thier own movements,but
most out source the movements.
The watch you describe,sounds as though it may be early teens,or
older. Wristwatches really didn't catch on until after WWI. Before then
they were thought of as a fad,of sorts. So preserving the appearance of
a pocket watch in a wrist watch,may have been more of a marketing
gimick,at the turn of the century..
Joe
|
1076.44 | unknown watch | HANDVC::STEVELIU | | Mon Jan 27 1997 21:24 | 11 |
|
I saw that watch on a antique watch shop but must be already brought by
someone else. I don't remember the internal label but you can tell that
this is a watch of workmanship from its looks and machinery. it's a
watch made in the 30's probably by some less known and small family
business watch-maker but with high quality workmanship.
I will not mind getting a less-known watch if it is of high quality
but reasonable price.
sl.
|
1076.45 | Iraqi Breitling Navitimer | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Tue Jan 28 1997 13:57 | 21 |
|
Hi,
That's a good point. What do you concider be reasonably priced. Lets
take a Breitling Navitimer,for example,they usually fetch $800 to $1000
on the used market. I saw one recently,which was the former property
of an Iraqi Fighter Pilot,complete with Iraqi Air Force markings,for
around $900. Is this a good deal?
I heard a timepiece jobber,stuck it to old Sadam,by pulling the old
shell game on him. Breitling Navitimer case and face,with a no-name
movement. So now,is it worth it. Most likely if documentation can be
supplied with the timepiece,capture paperwork and so on. It will be
worth many times that of a standard Navitimer.
Sometime in the future,I'm not sure if I care to speculate with a
Grand for a bogus watch. Still wringing my hands over that one.
Joe
|
1076.46 | Peerless or Priceless | HANDVC::STEVELIU | | Tue Jan 28 1997 21:11 | 22 |
|
The Breitling you saw has a historic background and so its value
should be higher than one without it.
yes, it is difficult to determine what is reasonable price unless
one have a idea of how much it will cost to buy a similar watch
in the market.
My rule of thumb for assessing the price of a less-known but high-quality
watch is that it should not cost more than a certain % of a similar watch
made by a renown watch-maker.That certain % can only judged by experience
and can be anywhere between 10-50%.
so you can see brand-name do carry a heavy-weight for me ! But I
definitely will not mind getting a less-known quality watch for a
reasonable price. what's your opinion ?
sl.
|
1076.47 | | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Wed Jan 29 1997 09:30 | 22 |
|
Hi,
I also try to never pay more than I can get out of a watch. I see
people paying the full $3,000+ for a brand new SS Submariner,and
wondering what they will say when no one will allow more than $1,800
on trade-in,when thier tastes change,to something different. A
previously owned,Rolex reconditioned Submariner,cannot be distinguished
from a brand new one and still will carry a one year unlimited
warranty. The same as new Sub will now be between $2,000 and $2,500,
depending on how upscale the Jewelers store is. Wear it for a couple of
years and trade it in,only looseing between $200 to $700 instead of
$1,000+,minimizing the lose.
For me I would look around for an 85% to 95% SS Sub,in the $1200 to
$1800 range,which I see all the time. Send it to Rolex New York or
Dallas,along with the $300,then make a couple of bucks on the other
end of the deal.
I've heard good things about Rolex New York,and Bad things about thier
Dallas facility.
Joe
|
1076.48 | | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Fri Jan 31 1997 09:44 | 21 |
| I still have the watch I received for my graduation back in 1970.
It's a Waltham Chronograph/stop watch. It has a stainless
steel case and a blue face. The second/minute dials in the face
are machined out so they appear silver.
It's a hefty watch (thick) but still runs great. I take it out of
the drawer every now and then to give it a workout.
I don't have it with me today, but something that always
intrigued me about the watch was under the 6 on the watch face
is written (in very tiny letters) is "In Cabloc". Any idea
what this means.
BTW, there are no numbers in the face. The designations are marked
by small silver rectangles. It also has illuminated spots along all
the appropriate points.
Any idea of the value?
Chip
|
1076.49 | Incabloc | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Fri Jan 31 1997 10:05 | 17 |
|
Hey Chip,
An INCABLOC is a shock absorbing device which permits the endstone of
the balance to "give" when the watch is subjected to an impact or a
jolt.
It is shaped kinda like a hour-glass shaped wishbone,and can be seen
on the bottom side of the movement if you have a watch with the crystal
back. The Balance Staff, holds the Balance Wheel,this is the wheel
which does all that whiring back and forth. The Cap Jewel is on the
ends of the Balance Staff,Cap Jewel is another name for the endstone.
There are other mechanisms,which do the same thing,INCABLOCs are usually
on the upper scale movements,Valjoux uses this method of shock
resistance as well.
It sounds like a neat timepiece,Chip.
Joe
|
1076.50 | | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Mon Feb 03 1997 05:49 | 5 |
| Thanks for the information! It's funny that I've wondered
about that term ever since I received the watch, but never
really pursued it.
Chip
|
1076.51 | the Original Rolex Explorer | HANDVC::STEVELIU | | Tue Feb 04 1997 23:23 | 20 |
|
You just can't believe how the price of the original Rolex Explorer I
is jumping so fast every year.
Among the other Rolex sporty watches (which includes the submariner,
the Explorer II, the Sea-Dweller and the GMT-master I and II) the
original Explorer I has its value appraised the highest since it
was first released. Truly magnificent !
The original Explorer I was last manufactured in 1988 and Explorer I
made in that year and those made in the 80's are the most pricy of
them. Those in the 70's are the least expensive for some particular
reason. Those in the 50's and 60's can fetch higher price.
The reborned Explorer I was first manufactured in 1991 but their
value are comparatively speaking much less valued by collectors.
what is the situation in US now ?
sl.
|
1076.52 | | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Wed Feb 05 1997 08:13 | 10 |
|
Hi,
Rolex Sport watches are now at what many industry insiders consider,
an all time high,with the 1970'ish so call James Bond
Submariner,leading the pack. It is distinctive in the "EGG_SHELL"
coloured luminous dial markings.
Joe
|
1076.53 | the plastic case | HANDVC::STEVELIU | | Sun Feb 09 1997 21:33 | 13 |
|
I see so there is a high demand for the 70's Submariner in US
and James Bond-Sean Connery did make this watch famous), but in
HongKong (one of the major cities which consume Rolex), it is the
80's Explorer I which is the most sought after.
does anyone recall when did Rolex start not making plastic
front cover and moving onto using sapphire crystal or glass
for its sport watches ? I saw a 80's Explorer I recently
but it was still using plastic as watch front cover.
sl.
|
1076.54 | They do love Rolex,in Singapore and Hong Kong | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Mon Feb 10 1997 11:50 | 20 |
|
Hi,
I don't have any books with me,but the date 1985-1988 comes to mind as
the years they "started" to use the Sapphire crystal,as opposed to
plexiglass. I prefer plexiglass as when it is scratched,which will
eventually happen,it may be polished quite easily, The sapphire is hard
and not easily scratched,but when it is,the whole thing must be
replaced,with a new sapphire crystal,and is quite costly.
I have marveled at the voracious and vociferous,appetite folks from
Hong Kong and Singapore,have for Rolex watches. I think they would
rather starve with a Rolex,than eat wearing a Timex. The
Oyster-Perpetual in my collection,came from Singapore,but the dealer
said he had bought it from someone in The States,for resale in
Singapore. I understand the Rolex Service Center in Singapore must be
watched with care,as they have mis-identified some mixed variation
models in the past. They might call a 5500 with an Oyster dial a 1002.
Joe
|
1076.55 | what do you think ? | HANDVC::STEVELIU | | Mon Feb 10 1997 22:51 | 10 |
|
Yes, the Explorer I saw was from 1984 just before the Sapphire crystal
was introduced and so is having a plastic surface. But I wonder why it
is not with plexiglass. Other than that, it is in very good condition.
The seller is fetching US$3800 for it, should I consider it ? I would
like to replace plastic surface with Sapphire crystal, would Rolex
dealer replace it for me and for how much roughly ?
sl.
|
1076.56 | | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Tue Feb 11 1997 08:12 | 16 |
|
Hi,
No,Rolex says there is no way to adapt the Sapphire to an earlier
model. I understand there was an engineering change to the case and the
bezel to accomodate the thicker sapphire.
The price of near $4,000 is excessive for an Explorer I,even if it had
both boxs,and was in mint/unworn condition. Are you located in the Far
East? If so perhaps I could recommend a merchant with better prices,in
your area. One fellow I converse with on occasion,is in the highlands
of Thailand,and literally has no access to any type of vendor,but still
gets catalogs,brought in for mailorder,of the watches he wants.
Joe
|
1076.57 | dealers in HK | HANDVC::STEVELIU | | Tue Feb 11 1997 21:08 | 7 |
|
I am located in HongKong, will you recommend some dealers there ?
thanks for your tips but I definitely would like to get a 1988
Explorer I but not from that dealer I saw though.
sl.
|
1076.58 | Moonphase | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Wed Feb 12 1997 08:07 | 18 |
|
Hi,
You bet. Try a guy by the name of Gary Shin at Moonphase Timepieces.
Rm 801, Dundas Square, 43h Dundas St, Mongkok, Kowloon.
Tel : (852) 90948963
Fax : (852) 25395863
E-mail : [email protected]
They are supposed to have 200 Rolex in stock. I have never had
business dealings with them,but thier prices appear to be inline with
that I am familiar with. As always,Let The Buyer Beware,a little
caution goes a long way.
Good Luck in your quest.
Joe
|
1076.59 | thanks | HANDVC::STEVELIU | | Wed Feb 12 1997 20:46 | 6 |
|
thanks Joe, I will check it out.
By the way, what is your expected price for a 1985-1988 Explorer I ?
sl.
|
1076.60 | | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Thu Feb 13 1997 08:53 | 11 |
|
Hi,
They show an Explorer II for around US$2100,and a GMT Master for
US$1650. If thier priceing is linear,this would price an Explorer I
around the US$2600-US$3100 range. This is just a guess,and does not
factor HK$ exchange rate,or haggle factor. I hate paying asking price
for anything.
Joe
|
1076.61 | 1910-1920 antique watches | HANDVC::STEVELIU | | Mon Mar 03 1997 04:51 | 19 |
|
I ran across some old watches from the 1910-1920 period. These
watches have porcelain dials and open cover bottoms. They are
all hand-winding, of course and they are weared with narrow
watch-strips.
These watches were not manufactured by well-known watch-makers
but they were swiss-made.
do you have any idea of their price-range ? or tips on assessing
these watches ?
They are very good-looking watches though.
sl.
|
1076.62 | | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Mon Mar 03 1997 08:41 | 18 |
|
Hi,
These watches fall into the area,of unknown maker,but the movement
may be of a well known and respected manufacturer. The "Ebauches",as
they are called,are manufactured,by an affiliation of 17 firms,each of
these Swiss companies,have a distinct mark,they place on movements,they
originate,in thier factories. Like Valjoux,is a very pronounced capital
"R" inside the script box. These marks will appear on the base plate
and very often must be viewed with a "Loupe",or some other magnification
device.
I never buy a watch without viewing the movement,and try to stay at
17J or better yet 21J or better. My Oyster-Perpetual is a 25J
movement,for instance. My Seiko Auto/Chrono,for daily wear,is a 17J
movement.
Joe
|
1076.63 | Omega de Ville | HANDVC::STEVELIU | | Wed Mar 12 1997 22:53 | 22 |
|
The unknown maker is "DOXA", the movement is in excellent condition but
the body is rusty as it is made of "iron" which is rare.
Joe, have you heard of this maker ?
Another watch I would like to assess its price is Omega de Ville,
made in the 1960's, and it's the renown rectangular Omega.
The 1967 model is particularly what I am interested, but I would
also like to find out the availability and price range of different
models made in different years.
steve
|
1076.64 | | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Thu Mar 13 1997 07:57 | 16 |
|
Hi,
Doxa is a well respected name in time pieces,and may be treated with
the same respect as an Omega or Hamilton. Omega DeVilles are found in
solid gold,Stainless Steel,and Gold Fill. The average price I see for
a excellent condition DeVille is about the same for the Auto Seamaster
which is nearly identical,as a matter of fact I recently sold an Omega
Seamaster DeVille to Paul at Finertimes in Florida,for $30 more than I
paid for it. I bought it at a local Flea Market for $99. It was an auto
round,one piece case,14KGF,and was in perfect condition,with the white
linen dial,and gold bar type markers. A really nice looking watch,with
a Crocodile band,and a gold filled buckle.
Joe
|
1076.65 | | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Thu Mar 13 1997 09:04 | 14 |
|
Hi,
I forgot to mention the prefered Omega Wristwatch. It is a
Constellation,known to insiders as the "Connie". The "observatory"
model is especially sought after,there is a unique logo on the back
of the watch,and it is a Certified Chonometer,which will be stated
in the dial. A superior watch in everyway,the Constellation,in the
"Pan" dial,with the observatory logo,will hold it's value for a long
time,to come,and holds similar status,to a Tudor,which is made by
Rolex.
Joe
|
1076.66 | Omega DeVille again | HANDVC::STEVELIU | | Tue Mar 25 1997 06:30 | 13 |
|
you bought Omega watch DeVille at $99. can it be that cheap ?
Here in HK, I saw one store fetches above US$250.
Is it under sold in your area or over priced here ?
steve
|
1076.67 | | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Tue Mar 25 1997 08:51 | 35 |
|
Hi,
I only buy a watch I can sell for more than I paid,and try to be
reserved and wait for the right deal. For every watch I buy,I pass on
50,which are overpriced,in poor condition,or in some other way
unsatisfactory. I usually pay %50 or less of market,or I don't buy it.
That is why I do not look for a specific watch,I look for the best
deal. Eventually,you will have enough "trade goods" so you can trade up
to the watch you may want.
For instance I'll buy whatever is the best price,stock pile a few nice
pieces I may not be very excited about,but are a good buy and
desireable to someone else. After a couple of mouths of this stock
piling,I'll start looking for the watch I am interested in,then
approach the owner with a deal.
"I'll trade you two DeVilles,and two Seamasters,with $200 for your Rolex
Oyster-Perpetual." The market value of the four watches I have offered
would be around $800 to $900 dollars,but the dealer is looking at them
as $600 to $700 as he has to make something on them too. So he looks at
my offer as $800 to $900,and the merchandise has about another
$200,when he sells them. So he could realise $1100 on the deal. If he
has his Rolex marked for $950,he is coming out with more than he
originally wanted. He doesn't know I only have about $400 into the
watches,so It will be as though I paid $600 for the Rolex. I can then
trade the Rolex and some cash for a Breitling Navitimer,or something.
You can see the progression,of haveing less into something,than market
value,then useing that value in your favor. Even though it may not be
your dream watch,some of them are excellent tradeing material.
I'll sign off now,before I let some more of my tactics out of the bag.
Joe
|
1076.68 | Square Watches | HANDVC::STEVELIU | | Thu Apr 17 1997 05:27 | 7 |
|
I am fond of square-shape watches, they are even rarer than rectangular
watches.
what are some of the best square watch to collect ?
steve
|
1076.69 | Omega and Hamilton | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Thu Apr 17 1997 08:22 | 11 |
|
Hi Steve,
Most of the larger and older,watch makers had a watch case of that
shape. Hamilton and Omega come to mind as haveing many different
rectangular cases. I would stick with the solid gold with the high
jeweled movements,they will never go down in value,I suppose.
Collectors love'm.
Joe
|
1076.70 | Appraisals | BIGQ::GULDNER | | Mon Apr 28 1997 15:32 | 7 |
| Any recommendations where I could get an honest (and reasonable)
appraisal for a couple of bags of old watches/jewelry my mother wants
to rid herself of? I'm sure most of it is junque but one never knows..
Located in Worcester Ma.
Thanks, Ed
|
1076.71 | | ALFSS2::HENDERSON_J | | Tue Apr 29 1997 08:02 | 13 |
|
If there is some good stuff,and some so-so stuff. Take it to any large
jewelry store in your area,which has an Estate Appraiser Service. These
folks usually have a regular circuit the run for several different
jewelers. So you may have to leave the stuff with them,and the
appraiser can get to your articles,when possible. There is a charge for
this,so enquire up front. You may wish to ask them for two
values,replacement value,for insurance purposes,and real market value.
It could be worth the money to have it done,this way,but only if your
sure there is something of sufficient value to offset the expense.
Joe
|
1076.72 | the 1016 3-6-9 | HANDVC::STEVELIU | | Wed Jun 04 1997 02:34 | 8 |
|
what's the US market value now for a 70's/80's Rolex Explorer I ?
As you know, the 90's Rolex Explorer I has a face lift which I
do not like. I prefer the older model "1016", the more elegent
3-6-9 I call it.
steve
|