Conference thebay::joyoflex

    Yes.

    Are you certain ?
    
    (pp Heisenberg)

    The obligatory disagreement response:
    
    The answer may be "Yes" in his reality, but it's "No" in mine.
    
    >M

Without the base note, this string of replies is not a little bizarre.

Stephen "oh_let_me_try_it_too" Tin)#)#)#)#)#)#)#)#)#)#)#)#)#)#)#)#ius

        eeeeek! that's the music from ....
        
        The Twilight Zone!

Re .18

> Without the base note, this string of replies is not a little bizarre.

It's not obvious, so I'd better make it explicit.  I replied with .1
after .0 was deleted except for the title.

Now, back to your regularly scheduled dead air.

Dave C.

    totally disgunctive, non-relational, randomly disorganized thoughts on
    life, death, the universe, and Dick Clark's hair dye manufacturer

    re: -1
    

    Re .24 (re .23):
    Well said, except "disjunctive" was misspelled.
    
    >M

    Re 25 (re 24 (re 23))
    
    Is "Well said, except "disjunctive" was misspelled" well said ...
    
    I wonder ?  It looks to me like a "that" is missing, since the
    exception is a phrase.

    De spillin rooles es en de bass noat!! ---->??????????

    RE 26 (Re 25 (re 24 (re 23)))
    
    Really now, let's get back to the subject out of hand....
    
    I had just finished reading a loooooooooong proposal and was not
    checking every word and phasing.  This is a random response with little
    (or no) reference to the real world.

>>	checking every word and phasing.
				^^^^^^^

	I hope that phasar was set on "stun"!

	Dan

This is certainly one of the most puzzling topics that I've seen today.

Truly opaque.  Yes, definitively, opaque.  The paragon of opacity.  The nadir
of transparency.  Utterly unseethroughable.

Wook

RE -1

>Truly opaque.  Yes, definitively, opaque.  The paragon of opacity.  The nadir
>of transparency.  Utterly unseethroughable.

Wook,

sorry to be a bit pedantic here, but do you really believe such a clear
statement is appropriate in this topic? I mean: considering the topic, couldn't
you just say:


errr....


... or something like that?

:-)
Arie

    	I realise the object of this topic is not merely
    incomprehensability but anticomprehensability to the uttermost degree,
    so erthyngyunig malertyug lidsate bufgrat with my disk space.

    
    I think reply 35 broke noting protoccol and should be removed by the 
    moderator. Please bear in mind, and. But two, in which not.
    
    Richard.

    Re .36:
    But .35 was written by a moderator...
    
    We now return you to your scheduled digression.
    >M

    
    Oh yes, I rememeber. I was in ther cellar all night developing photos,
    so I never actually realised there'd been a power cut. 
    
    Richard.

    RE:.-1
    
    	Gee, somehow that note fits into this topic, eh?
    
    
    	:^)
    
    		PJS

    re: -.n
    
    FLAME ON !!!

        ...���... :-(
    
    FLAME OFF !!!
    
    Sorry, I had to get that off my chest.

    RE: .19

    �    ...���... :-(
    
    ???

    Re .43:
    >�    ...���... :-(
    >
    >???
    
    !��? :�}

    Some look at the world and ask "????????????"
    
    I look at the world and ask "%#@*!"
    
    	- Henry David Thorough

    �	- Henry David Thorough
    
    Does this belong under "nominal punishment"?
    
    :-)

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

RE .-1

>      <<< Note 701.47 by TKOV51::DIAMOND "This note is illegal tender." >>>
                                  ^^^^^^^

Hey! That's a lot of little diamonds there!
:-)
Arie

    Even on nothing,
    It's possible to say something
    
    Herv�
    

    And to think this note is � Digital Equipment Corp.
                                 
    						Don