Title: | The Joy of Lex |
Notice: | A Notes File even your grammar could love |
Moderator: | THEBAY::SYSTEM |
Created: | Fri Feb 28 1986 |
Last Modified: | Mon Jun 02 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 1192 |
Total number of notes: | 42769 |
Is there a note discussing words that derived from words that don't currently mean what they used to mean when the derivation took place? (Alas, I obfuscate.) For example... Barber comes from barb, from the Latin word for beard. Now, barb is never (seldom?) used with this meaning. Spd
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
465.1 | mutatis mutandis | HEART::KNOWLES | Brevity is the soul of wi | Mon Jan 11 1988 13:32 | 6 |
I have a dim recollection of some lecturer saying that `glamour' and `grammar' share the same root. This isn't something I'd feel happy about defending; but if it's true, the current meaning of glamour certainly has nothing to do with grammar. b | |||||
465.2 | glamour/grammer | YAZOO::B_REINKE | where the sidewalk ends | Mon Jan 11 1988 18:50 | 7 |
My American Heritage Dictionary indicates that glamour is a var of grammer. This proably relates to the old associations that both had with magic. To cast a glamour over someone was to cast a spell and grammery was a word for the study of magic. Bonnie | |||||
465.3 | Waxing ponderous, are we? | MARRHQ::MALLONEE | Reaching <ESC> velocity! | Mon Jan 11 1988 21:24 | 1 |