T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
400.1 | NoMiNaL CaPiTaLiZaTiOn | MAGOO::PFC | What a concept! | Thu Aug 20 1987 09:11 | 7 |
|
'fortran' is an abbreviation for, an acronym for, or something related
to 'formula translator'. As such, by your rules, it should be ForTran
- but FORTRAN is probably correct. 'Fortran' is probably never correct.
Of course, I would mind if we just banned the word from existence
entirely.
|
400.2 | | BEING::POSTPISCHIL | Always mount a scratch monkey. | Thu Aug 20 1987 09:30 | 9 |
| Re .0:
BASIC stands for "beginner's all-purpose symbolic instruction code.
FORTRAN is from "formula translation". Acronyms should have all
capital letters, even if parts of them come from letters other than
initial letters.
-- edp
|
400.3 | Some acronym become normal words. | MAGOO::PFC | What a concept! | Thu Aug 20 1987 10:03 | 10 |
| > Acronyms should have all
> capital letters, even if parts of them come from letters other than
> initial letters.
Agreed, until such time as the word becomes part of the language.
When was the last time you wrote "RADAR" as opposed to radar? Any
one want to argue that 'FORTRAN' and 'BASIC' are part of the language
now?
|
400.4 | A case for lower case | COMICS::KEY | Calling International Rescue... | Thu Aug 20 1987 10:58 | 14 |
| The full capitalisation of acronyms is a recent trend (the last
decade, I would say). They always used to be mixed - RoSPA, for
example, or any of a million military acronyms. I used to work on
an EPoS project (a capital "O" was frowned upon).
I concede on FORTRAN, however.
I still stand by Pascal and Ada (oh, and Forth).
One thing I find seriously worrying is the increased number of people
who write entirely in capital letters, just to save having to worry
about correct capitalisation (see any notes file).
Andy
|
400.5 | aH=HaH! | LEZAH::BOBBITT | face piles of trials with smiles | Thu Aug 20 1987 11:22 | 11 |
| re: .0 - smile when you say that about documenters, pardner...
SoMEdAY I aM GOinG TO WriTE A DoCUMeNT In StUDly CaPs....JUsT LiKE
ThIS....JUsT FOr PEoplE LIke yOU!
:-)
(looks like ee cummings run amok)
-Jody
|
400.6 | Thanks for forgetting Fortransit | DSTR10::MOORE | ALL-IN-1 for the masses | Thu Aug 20 1987 13:02 | 9 |
| At least none of you suggested returning to Fortransit the original
name FORTRAN name. As to capitalizing - there are some poor folks
at Digital that tell me they still type in all caps because it is
faster. I agree with the person that said it's like SHOUTING at
me. But alas, many don't see it that way because they are too lazy
to press the shift key occasionally, when the lock key is right
there for them to leave engaged.
Bob Moore - a sometime reader, and always enjoyer of this conference
|
400.7 | StUDly? | COMICS::KEY | Calling International Rescue... | Thu Aug 20 1987 14:03 | 8 |
| re: .5
What's a "studly"?
a
Also: Have you ever tried reading the L T X manual?
E
Andy (I'm smiling, I'm smiling!)
|
400.8 | | BEING::POSTPISCHIL | Always mount a scratch monkey. | Thu Aug 20 1987 14:12 | 9 |
| Re .4:
> They always used to be mixed - RoSPA, for example, or any of a
> million military acronyms.
Doesn't use by the military mean the usage is improper English?
-- edp
|
400.9 | A trail Blaiser | SSDEVO::GOLDSTEIN | | Thu Aug 20 1987 20:37 | 9 |
| Re: .0
Pascal was not a nineteenth century scientist; he lived in the
seventeenth century. His major work was in mathematics - he and
Fermat are regarded as the founders of probability theory. He is
also credited with inventing and building one of the first calculating
machines in history.
Bernie
|
400.10 | And what do the "e" and "d" stand for? | WELSWS::MANNION | Farewell Welfare, Pt. 3 | Fri Aug 21 1987 05:50 | 4 |
| Why is "edp" not "EDP"?
PM
|
400.11 | Eric De Postlethwaite | COMICS::KEY | Calling International Rescue... | Fri Aug 21 1987 09:38 | 22 |
| Re: .10
"edp" _is_ "EDP". If you don't know what the "E" and the "D" stand
for, you've probably got the "P" wrong. The term is actually a code
word for "COBOL programmers" (or CoBOL...)
Re: .9
Thankyou. History never was my strong point. Anyone like to give
a potted biography of Ada (not Linda) Lovelace? I _think_ she was
a financier and colleague of Charles Babbage, but I'm not sure.
For those of you who didn't know, Babbage was the man who designed
the VAX 8800 in 1895. Due to a shortage of RAM chips at that time,
he was never able to build it.
Re: .6
"Fortransit"? Is this, perhaps, a derivation from Ford Transit,
implying that Fortran is slow and noisy but reliable? (Joke for
UK readers.)
Andy
|
400.12 | DIGITAL vs. digital | TOPDOC::SLOANE | Bruce is on the loose | Fri Aug 21 1987 10:21 | 10 |
| DIGITAL (all caps) is short for that corporate entity, Digital
Equipment Corporation.
Digital (or digital, when it is not the first word in the sentence)
is the opposite of analog.
This convention is necessary because of the two meanings of the
word "digital."
-bs (and B.S. has several meanings, too)
|
400.13 | correction | ERASER::KALLIS | Raise Hallowe'en awareness. | Fri Aug 21 1987 10:28 | 13 |
| Re .12:
"Digital," initial-capitalized, in press releases and other company-
originated copy refers to "Digital Equipment Corporation," subsequent
to the full corporate name appearing in the copy. Distinction between
the company and the "opposite" of analog is made via the way the
word is used in context.
"DIGITAL" is a holdover from the early days when the corpoorate
name was completely capitalized in advertising copy; it's appropriate
nowhere else (unless all the copy is all caps).
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
400.14 | DIGITAL vs. DEC | TOPDOC::SLOANE | Bruce is on the loose | Fri Aug 21 1987 10:28 | 8 |
|
Re: .12
In addition, in technical writing the company is referred to
formally as "Digital Equipment Corporation," and informally as
"DIGITAL." It is never referred to as "DEC."
-bs
|
400.15 | | BEING::POSTPISCHIL | Always mount a scratch monkey. | Fri Aug 21 1987 11:32 | 11 |
| Re .10:
"edp" is not "EDP" because I prefer it "edp", it stands for "Eric David
Postpischil" (after Eric the Red) or "Electronic Data Processing"
because my mother would not let my father make my middle name "Samuel",
so my father's company is "Expert Systems Programming", and my brother
is "Alex Matthew Postpischil" (after Alexander the Great) for the
abbreviation for "ampere".
-- edp
|
400.16 | | COMICS::KEY | Calling International Rescue... | Fri Aug 21 1987 13:51 | 12 |
| But what about
| | | | | | | |
|d|i|g|i|t|a|l|
|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|
And Digital is officially referred to as DEC in publicity material
etc. in the UK.
Beg your pardon, edp. I didn't realise it was you he was referring
to
ACK (handshake signal)
|
400.17 | What about the language C? | 4GL::LASHER | Working... | Fri Aug 21 1987 14:58 | 3 |
| Does it follow the "initial caps" rule or the "all caps" rule?
Lew Lasher
|
400.18 | | ERASER::KALLIS | Raise Hallowe'en awareness. | Fri Aug 21 1987 15:22 | 16 |
| Re .16
> But what about
> | | | | | | | |
> |d|i|g|i|t|a|l|
> |_|_|_|_|_|_|_|
>
>And Digital is officially referred to as DEC in publicity material
>etc. in the UK.
The Digital logo, and DEC, are registered trademarks of Digital
Equipment Corporation. DEC should only be used as part of something
(e.g., DECtape, DECwriter); the use of DEC in press materials in
the U.K. is unfortunate.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
400.19 | | MAY20::MINOW | Je suis Marxist, tendance Groucho | Sun Aug 23 1987 23:08 | 5 |
| I heard we stopped using DEC because the term was already trademarked
by a "Dairy Equipment Cooperative" in Iowa.
M.
|
400.20 | DIGITAL Dictionary | MARVIN::KNOWLES | Men's sauna in corpore sano | Mon Aug 24 1987 09:19 | 15 |
| The current Style Guide for Software Documentation (I haven't checked
the title, because my copy is out on long-term loan) stipulates all
caps for DIGITAL (meaning the company as opposed to the opposite of
analogue); and the DIGITAL Dictionary _uses_ all caps, except when
it spells out 'Digital Equipment Corporation': e.g.
page 1: spelt out - once
DIGITAL - as a noun, meaning the company, twice
DIGITAL - as an adjective, meaning of/pertaining to the
company, twice
I regret this, but can no longer fight it (since I changed from
editor to writer).
Bob :-(
|
400.21 | All hands on DEC | COMICS::KEY | Calling International Rescue... | Thu Aug 27 1987 09:25 | 15 |
| Re .18
We had a memo from the UK board of management instructing us to
refer to ourselves as "DEC" when talking to customers. Sorry if
you think this is unfortunate - I'll have a word with Lord Sir Geoff
Shingles about it.
What would have been wrong with "Digital Equipment"?
( - apart from the fact that "Digitalequipmentmate" would have been
a silly name for a PC)
This topic was discussed a few months ago in the UK_DIGITAL (sic)
notesfile.
Andy
|
400.22 | ...sigh... | ERASER::KALLIS | Why did you say that? | Thu Aug 27 1987 10:00 | 12 |
| Re .21:
Andy --
I think this is something to take up with Legal in Maynard. _We've_
been specifically instructed that because DEC is a registered trademark
(one of our few), it should only be used as an adjective. To do
otherwise weakens its standing as a trademark.
Perhaps the UK board of management oufght to check with Legal.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
400.23 | G'day | IPG::GOODENOUGH | Jeff Goodenough, IPG Reading-UK | Thu Aug 27 1987 10:44 | 6 |
| > ( - apart from the fact that "Digitalequipmentmate" would have been
> a silly name for a PC)
Aw, c'mon. That's what they answer when you call the Sydney office.
Jeff.
|
400.24 | Re .23: Beautiful!! | ERASER::KALLIS | A dead owl catches no mice | Thu Aug 27 1987 15:21 | 1 |
|
|
400.25 | Have a DEC day | COMICS::KEY | Calling International Rescue... | Fri Aug 28 1987 08:59 | 11 |
| re .22
Does this mean that every time AT&T use UNIX(TM) as a noun, they're
weakening its standing as a trademark? Is "adjectivity" a requirement
of trademarks? I'd genuinely be interested to know.
re .23
Throw another kooka on the barbie (TM)
Andy
|
400.26 | yep | INK::KALLIS | Little things come in small packages. | Fri Aug 28 1987 10:25 | 33 |
| Re .25:
>Does this mean that every time AT&T use UNIX(TM) as a noun, they're
>weakening its standing as a trademark? Is "adjectivity" a requirement
>of trademarks? I'd genuinely be interested to know.
Yes. There was an interesting case on this earlier this century.
George Eastman developed (unintentional pun) a low-cost, easy-to-use
camera that he called a Kodak camera. (As far as I've been able
to determine, the name was invented out of whole cloth because it
was short and easy to remember.) He wanted everyone to be "Kodak"
conscious; so, among other things, his company not only trademarked
"Kodak," but started using it as a noun, to be synonymous with
"camera." [E.g., "Don't forget to bring along your Kodak."] The
problem started qwhen the public started to refer to _any_ camera
as "a Kodak." When Eastman's company started protesting officially,
they were advised that the use of the word had become so common
that it was difficult to regard it as a trademark any more. So,
the company (now the Eastman Kodak Company) started rigidly enforcing
their trademark rights. There are apparently people on their staff
full time to check for trademark infractions.
The Technicolor Corporation had a similar problem in the early days
of chromatic film. "Technicolor," which was/is a specific process,
began to be taken by the public to mean anything not in monochrome.
That ciorporation started protecting its trademark, to the point
where when a story by the science-fiction author, Harry Harrison,
was published in _Analog_ a couple of decades ago under the title
_The Technicolor Time Machine_, the editor got a stiff little note
from the corporation's legal department that "Technicolor" was a
registered trademark.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
400.27 | Hoover | MARVIN::KNOWLES | Men's sauna in corporation baths | Fri Aug 28 1987 11:13 | 9 |
| Re: .-1,.-2
True - I've got a screed about this from US Legal; I'll MAIL it to
anyone who's interested.
I think this point of law is more commonly invoked in the US - American
speakers are careful to talk about 'vacuuming' although I seldom hear
an English speaker saying anything but 'hoovering' (even when the
appliance used is an Electrolux).
|
400.28 | | BEING::POSTPISCHIL | Always mount a scratch monkey. | Fri Aug 28 1987 11:35 | 9 |
| Re .26:
> (As far as I've been able to determine, the name was invented out of
> whole cloth because it was short and easy to remember.)
It was partially because George Eastman was fond of "k".
-- edp
|
400.29 | Aspirin used to belong to Bayer. | DSSDEV::STONE | Roy | Fri Aug 28 1987 17:48 | 5 |
|
If I'm not mistaken, "aspirin" was originally a trade name created
by the makers of Bayer Aspirin tablets. However, it has been allowed
for use within the public domain and can now be legally applied
to products manufactured by others.
|
400.30 | Holding the mayo | SSDEVO::GOLDSTEIN | | Fri Aug 28 1987 19:54 | 16 |
| A few years ago I had occasion to research the care and feeding
of trademarks. Among the material I collected was a very useful
document written by Kraft Foods for their internal use. It specified
how their trademarks were to be used in printed matter, especially
advertisements. Its purpose of course was to protect their trademarks
from the same fate as 'aspirin,' 'elevator,' 'nylon,' etc.
They said that all trademarks were to be regarded as _proper
adjectives_. For example, one should never write "Miracle Whip
tastes good;" one must write "Miracle Whip salad dressing tastes
good." Trademarks as proper adjectives seems like a clear concept
to me.
Bernie
(Please, no opinions about the taste of Miracle Whip salad dressing.)
|
400.31 | | WAYWRD::GORDON | So this is what it's like to be poor... | Sat Aug 29 1987 12:56 | 5 |
| Re: .27
Don't helicopters "hoover"?
--Doug
|
400.32 | "Aspirin" still belongs to Bayer in Canada | SUPER::KENAH | Mythical Conversation Fragments | Mon Aug 31 1987 12:43 | 5 |
| re .29: "Aspirin" is still a trade name in Canada -- ask for aspirin
and you'll get Bayer. I've forgotten the name Canadians use to
specify acetylsalicylic acid tablets.
andrew
|
400.33 | | ERIS::CALLAS | Strange days, indeed. | Mon Aug 31 1987 13:41 | 6 |
| re Aspirin:
And in Europe. I believe that the only place where Aspirin is *not* a
trademark of Bayer is the U.S.
Jon
|
400.34 | Aspirina | MLNIT5::FINANCE | | Tue Sep 01 1987 04:40 | 5 |
| MLNOIS::HARBIG
re. 33
That's true in Italy but I'm not sure about the U.K.
I think that there are various brands there.
Max
|
400.35 | aspirin in the UK | IOSG::DAVEY | Nota bene | Tue Sep 01 1987 06:53 | 7 |
| Aspirin is not a trademark in the UK. There are lots of brands of
aspirin (note small a) available here.
I thought it had something to do with the last war; Bayer being
a German company, we ignored their trade mark rights.
John.
|
400.36 | Love Bits and Bytes | TOPDOC::JAMES | | Tue Sep 01 1987 16:22 | 7 |
| If anyone is still interested, Ada Lovelace, daughter of Lord Byron
(the poet), in addition to being Charles Babbage's financier and
colleague, was his mistress.
Oh, those Victorians!!!
stel
|
400.37 | Collapse of stout party | COMICS::KEY | Calling International Rescue... | Wed Sep 02 1987 09:55 | 13 |
| Re: the original note and others
I've been browsing in my Shorter OED, and...
It lists "Fortran (also FORTRAN)..." Ho hum.
"Aspirin" is described as "originally a trademark" but is given
common noun status.
Incidentally, the etymology for "real-time" quotes an IBM 3600 sales
brochure. Has DEC ever gained such respectability, I wonder?
Andy
|
400.38 | The AHD has its good side;-) | REGENT::EPSTEIN | Bruce Epstein | Thu Sep 03 1987 15:04 | 5 |
| >> Incidentally, the etymology for "real-time" quotes an IBM 3600 sales
>> brochure. Has DEC ever gained such respectability, I wonder?
FWIW, DEC products are pictured in many places in _The American
Heritage Dictionary_, e.g. the illustration for the word "computer".
|
400.39 | why not? | INK::KALLIS | Raise Hallowe'en awareness. | Thu Sep 03 1987 15:33 | 6 |
| Re .38:
Well, they _ought_ to be. _The American Heritage Dictionary_ was
_typeset_ with Digital products (actually, Typeset-8). ;-)
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
400.40 | trademarked drink | DELNI::GOLDSTEIN | All Hail Marx and Lennon (Bros. & Sisters) | Wed Sep 09 1987 18:43 | 11 |
| re: Kodak
George Eastman was a teetotaler. His favorite drink was soda water.
If his favorite letter was 'k', then didn't have much trouble liking
"Kodak".
Aspirin is known as ASA in some places, like Canada.
Use of all-caps for acronyms (FORTRAN, COBOL) makes sense. Use
of all-caps for non-acronyms (DIGITAL) is offensive. "I can shout.
Don't hear you."
|
400.41 | | PASTIS::MONAHAN | I am not a free number, I am a telephone box | Wed Sep 09 1987 23:43 | 2 |
| I assume that ASA is just an abbreviation of acetyl-salicylic
acid?
|
400.42 | Synchronicity? | DECSIM::HEILMAN | Please, I can shout, don't hear you | Thu Sep 10 1987 15:35 | 5 |
| > of all-caps for non-acronyms (DIGITAL) is offensive. "I can shout.
> Don't hear you."
Must be synchronicity! I just changed my personal name to the above
days ago.
|
400.43 | A few more unprotected trademarks | KESEY::GETSINGER | Eric Getsinger | Mon Sep 14 1987 14:58 | 11 |
| The following trademarks are listed as "unprotected" in "Words into Type:"
aspirin kerosene nylon
calico lanolin raisin bran
cellophane linoleum trampoline
escalator milk of magnesia yo-yo
hansom mimeograph zipper
Raisin bran? Wow.
Eric
|
400.44 | | AKOV68::BOYAJIAN | Chaise pomme | Tue Sep 15 1987 03:26 | 11 |
| There's another that seems to be coming into being.
Those who've been watching the Showtime movie channel have
probably noticed that the "Showtime" logo is displayed at
given times throughout a movie. Apparently, Showtime is doing
this because some people are starting to think of the trade-
marked name "HBO" (for Home Box Office) as a general term for
"cable movie station" and want to get it into the heads of
these people that they aren't actually watching HBO.
--- jerry
|
400.45 | | ERIS::CALLAS | Strange days, indeed. | Tue Sep 15 1987 11:12 | 8 |
| Another explanation for .44 would be that they display "Showtime" on
the screen out of perversity -- if you're taping the movie, you're
taping the "Showtime" message, and thus are always reminded of where
you taped it. Thus a form of advertising. Also, it is in the interests
of the movie sellers, since to get a clean copy, you have to buy it. If
the clean copy means something to you, you will.
Jon
|
400.46 | | AKOV68::BOYAJIAN | Chaise pomme | Wed Sep 16 1987 02:42 | 9 |
| re:.45
That may well be the real reason. But the reason I gave has
appeared in print as Showtime's "official" reason.
I tend to believe it because I've heard people use the term
HBO to mean "pay movie station".
--- jerry
|
400.47 | | RECV::PARODI | John H. Parodi DTN 381-1640 | Thu Mar 30 1995 07:31 | 4 |
|
Flaunt vs. flout. They are pretty close, except in meaning...
JP
|
400.48 | Et ego | PEKING::SULLIVAND | Not gauche, just sinister | Fri Mar 31 1995 06:04 | 6 |
| the 99.9999% of people in digital who think "alot" is a word
not to mention "aswell", aswell :-)
Colonel Blimp
|
400.49 | fruitfully speaking | RICKS::PHIPPS | DTN 225.4959 | Fri Mar 31 1995 07:10 | 1 |
| Is that anything like, fruitfly?
|
400.50 | | JRDV04::DIAMOND | segmentation fault (california dumped) | Sun Apr 02 1995 18:59 | 13 |
| As Humpty Dumpty would of said:
Another words, the question(sp) is who is too be master, the
men (and woman) or the nonwords.
Pet peeve number 114:
While I was typing the above reply, DECwindows had more pause than my
cat. I spent more time waiting than typing.
-- Norman Diamond
|