T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
249.2 | Why | DELNI::CANTOR | Dave Cantor | Sat Sep 27 1986 14:56 | 6 |
| Re .0
I don't understand. Why would 'compatibility' be a single-word
oxymoron?
Dave C.
|
249.3 | | BEING::POSTPISCHIL | Always mount a scratch monkey. | Sat Sep 27 1986 20:14 | 9 |
| Re .2:
I think the idea is that the word has been somewhat overused by
describing too many items as compatible with others when they are not
completely compatible. Hence being told something is compatible is a
warning of many incompatibilities that will hinder your work.
-- edp
|
249.4 | Literally | DELNI::CANTOR | Dave Cantor | Sat Sep 27 1986 22:22 | 21 |
| Re .3
Thanks. I hadn't ever noticed that before. It's a sad state
of affairs.
Well, I have an example: 'literally'. 'Literally' is often
used ironically in newscasts, but you can't hear the surrounding
quotation marks, so it sounds assinine.
Joe Fubar, famous football player, literally burned the
stadium up with his 90-yard run.
Saying that Fubar burned the stadium up would have been emphatic
enough, but the sportswriter thought that an adverb was needed,
and 'figuratively' probably had too many syllables, or something.
That wasn't an exact quotation, of course. I made it up, but
it's based on something I actually heard, and then later heard
Paul Harvey comment on.
Dave C.
|
249.5 | Antilogies | FDCV01::BEAIRSTO | | Mon Sep 29 1986 09:55 | 10 |
| For several months there has been discussion in my alumni magazine
about words that have two directly contradictory meanings. The
moderator of the discussion has taken the liberty of naming them
'antilogies', and has had contributions in several languages. If you
want I can find the back issues my kids haven't destroyed and photocopy
them.
No, I don't remember any offhand. |-(
Rob (whose name provoked an early interest in multiple meanings)
|
249.6 | Antilogy | BAEDEV::RECKARD | | Mon Sep 29 1986 12:54 | 10 |
| re: .5
(From paperback American Heritage Dictionary ... 's good enough)
cleave� v. 1. To split or separate.
cleave� v. 1. To adhere; cling.
(They have two distinct Old English derivations.)
|
249.7 | "sanction" is an antilogy | HUDSON::HAMER | | Mon Sep 29 1986 17:01 | 1 |
|
|
249.8 | one blue east, one blue west | RAYNAL::OSMAN | and silos to fill before I feep, and silos to fill before I feep | Mon Sep 29 1986 18:35 | 6 |
| Re 249.4:
Another bad use of "literally" that is funny is
"When I heard that, it literally blew my mind!!"
/Eric
|
249.9 | for more... | BUCKY::MPALMER | | Thu Oct 02 1986 10:56 | 5 |
| re: .7, .6
see note 107
MP
|