[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference thebay::joyoflex

Title:The Joy of Lex
Notice:A Notes File even your grammar could love
Moderator:THEBAY::SYSTEM
Created:Fri Feb 28 1986
Last Modified:Mon Jun 02 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1192
Total number of notes:42769

249.0. ""Single-word oxymorons"" by AKOV68::BOYAJIAN (Forever On Patrol) Fri Sep 26 1986 01:09

    Here's a game. Tonight, I was engaged in a discussion of
    compatibility problems when I was suddenly struck by an idea
    and said, "It seems to me that 'compatibility' has become a
    single-word oxymoron."
    
    Now, I'm not sure how exactly to define the concept of a
    single-word oxymoron (which may, in itself, be an oxymoron :-)),
    which is why I related the genesis of the idea to give an
    example. It seems more like an intuitive concept to me.
    Perhaps it's something that's a muchly desired goal, that seems
    destined never to be acheived, thus in a way contradicting
    itself.
    
    Now, the game is to see if you can come up with other words
    that might be considered single-word oxymorons in the same
    way as "compatibility".
    
    --- jerry
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
249.2WhyDELNI::CANTORDave CantorSat Sep 27 1986 14:566
      Re .0
      
      I don't understand.  Why would 'compatibility' be a single-word
      oxymoron?  
      
      Dave C.
249.3BEING::POSTPISCHILAlways mount a scratch monkey.Sat Sep 27 1986 20:149
    Re .2:
    
    I think the idea is that the word has been somewhat overused by
    describing too many items as compatible with others when they are not
    completely compatible.  Hence being told something is compatible is a
    warning of many incompatibilities that will hinder your work. 
    
    
    				-- edp 
249.4LiterallyDELNI::CANTORDave CantorSat Sep 27 1986 22:2221
      Re .3
      
      Thanks.  I hadn't ever noticed that before.  It's a sad state
      of affairs.
      
      Well, I have an example:  'literally'.   'Literally' is often
      used ironically in newscasts, but you can't hear the surrounding
      quotation marks, so it sounds assinine.
      
          Joe Fubar, famous football player, literally burned the
      stadium up with his 90-yard run.
      
      Saying that Fubar burned the stadium up would have been emphatic
      enough, but the sportswriter thought that an adverb was needed,
      and 'figuratively' probably had too many syllables, or something.
      
      That wasn't an exact quotation, of course.  I made it up, but
      it's based on something I actually heard, and then later heard
      Paul Harvey comment on.
      
      Dave C.
249.5AntilogiesFDCV01::BEAIRSTOMon Sep 29 1986 09:5510
    For several months there has been discussion in my alumni magazine
    about words that have two directly contradictory meanings. The
    moderator of the discussion has taken the liberty of naming them
    'antilogies', and has had contributions in several languages. If you
    want I can find the back issues my kids haven't destroyed and photocopy
    them.
    
    No, I don't remember any offhand. |-(
    
    Rob (whose name provoked an early interest in multiple meanings) 
249.6AntilogyBAEDEV::RECKARDMon Sep 29 1986 12:5410
    re: .5
    
    (From paperback American Heritage Dictionary ... 's good enough)
    
    cleave� v.  1. To split or separate.
    
    cleave� v.  1. To adhere; cling.
    
    (They have two distinct Old English derivations.)
    
249.7"sanction" is an antilogyHUDSON::HAMERMon Sep 29 1986 17:011
249.8one blue east, one blue westRAYNAL::OSMANand silos to fill before I feep, and silos to fill before I feepMon Sep 29 1986 18:356
Re 249.4:

	Another bad use of "literally" that is funny is
	"When I heard that, it literally blew my mind!!"

/Eric
249.9for more...BUCKY::MPALMERThu Oct 02 1986 10:565
    re: .7, .6 
    
    see note 107
    
    MP