[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference thebay::joyoflex

Title:The Joy of Lex
Notice:A Notes File even your grammar could love
Moderator:THEBAY::SYSTEM
Created:Fri Feb 28 1986
Last Modified:Mon Jun 02 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1192
Total number of notes:42769

241.0. "Superlatives" by SSDEVO::GOLDSTEIN () Fri Sep 12 1986 20:17

    Is there a rule for the form of superlatives?
    
    We say something is the "most attractive," but we say it is the
    "prettiest".  We say "most interesting" and "dullest".  I have always
    played it by ear, using the form that sounds better or avoiding
    the one that sounds more awkward.  Does anyone know of a rule or
    guideline that specifies which form to use?
    
    Bernie
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
241.1Depends on its lengthBISTRO::LIRONroger liron @VBOMon Sep 15 1986 07:257
    The "-est" form is used when the adjective is short (2 syllabs or
    less); the "most" form for long ones.
    Same rule for the comparatives, with "-er" and "more".
    
    And, remember, all rules have exceptions - except this one ?
    
    
241.2As you like it.IOSG::DEMORGANMon May 18 1987 11:072
    "Most pretty" is also perfectly correct grammar. I agree that most
    [literate] people go by how it sounds.
241.3YIPPEE::LIRONMon May 18 1987 12:4017
    "Most pretty" is correct as an absolute superlative; another 
    example of this is "very good".
    
    The initial question, and all examples given, were concerned
    with superlatives of the relative form, eg "THE prettiest"
    or "THE best".
    
    You literate people wouldn't say "the most pretty girl", or "the 
    most good thing", or would you ? 
    
       	roger