T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
222.1 | A sequel to -.1 | TOPDOC::SLOANE | Notable notes from -bs- | Wed Jul 23 1986 10:47 | 22 |
|
The second book in the set is usually called the sequel.
The third book may make it a series. (However, books in a series can
be related to each other but not necessarily a continuing story -
i.e, many murder mystery series, where each is a "standalone.")
From a practical point of view, it's all marketing hype: how does
the publisher (and to a much lesser extent, the author) want the
public to view the latest release? If the first 3 books in Blish's
series sold only so-so, for example, the publisher might not want the
4th one tied in with them.
There are numerous exceptions, but I have been disappointed in many
sequels et al, and found them inferior to the first book. I think
the authors often get pressured from their publishers to write a
sequel to a good seller when they would prefer to write something
else.
-bs
-bs
|
222.2 | Its all greek to me | PASTIS::MONAHAN | | Wed Jul 23 1986 13:23 | 9 |
| Tri and tetra are derived from Greek numerals, while logos
(or something similar) is Greek for book. Bio is derived from the
Greek for life, while the Greek prefix for two is bi. So, though
I have never seen it used, I would guess the word you need is
bilogy
Dave
|
222.3 | dialogue? | GALLO::JMUNZER | | Wed Jul 23 1986 14:01 | 1 |
|
|
222.4 | The Greek is "Di-" | PROSE::WAJENBERG | | Thu Jul 24 1986 10:48 | 8 |
| Actualy, "bi-" is a Latin prefix. The equivalent Greek prefix is
"di-" so I suppose two books are a "dilogy," which I would prefer
to pronounce "DIE-lo-jee" rather than "DILL-o-jee," for esthetic
reasons. I find neither "bilogy" nor "dilogy" in my desk-side
dictionary, not that this proves much. One could always call the
book and its sequel a "pair."
Earl Wajenberg
|
222.5 | Try "duad" or "dyad" | SUPER::MATTHEWS | Don't panic | Thu Jul 24 1986 13:34 | 18 |
| I took the same approach as Earl, and couldn't find "dilogy" or
anything resembling it in the American Heritage or Webster's
3rd International.
If you need a word, you could use "duad" or "dyad," both Greek-rooted
terms for a pair of anything.
This has little to do with literary marketing; "trilogy" and
"tetralogy" can apply to literary, dramatic, or musical works. Also,
"trilogy" refers specifically to groups of three Greek tragedies, and
"tetralogy" to three tragedies plus a comedy, performed together at
some festival (maybe someone else knows more about this than I do...)
So the absence of "bilogy" in our vocabulary may mean that the ancient
Greeks didn't go for dramas in pairs. (Okay, so it may have to do with
marketing after all; but it predates science fiction by a long shot.)
Val
|
222.6 | irrelevant comment | NACHO::CONLIFFE | | Thu Jul 24 1986 14:01 | 5 |
| Not really relevant, but just to remind y'all that the book
"So Long, and Thanks for all The Fish" was billed as the fourth
book in the HitchHiker's trilogy.
Nigel
|
222.7 | The second in a dilogy of irrelevancy | TOPDOC::SLOANE | Notable notes from -bs- | Thu Jul 24 1986 14:07 | 4 |
| I suppose the next book will be the fifth one in the Hitchhiker
tetralogy.
-bs
|
222.8 | Nit alarm! | NOGOV::GOODENOUGH | Jeff Goodenough, IPG Reading-UK | Mon Jul 28 1986 16:56 | 1 |
| Re: .2 logos is word, biblios is book.
|
222.9 | Or "study of threesomes"? | 4GL::LASHER | Groups? Our groups've got groups! | Mon Jul 28 1986 19:17 | 4 |
| Re: .8
Trilogy = three words?
|
222.10 | DIPTYCH | BISTRO::LIRON | roger liron @VBO | Tue Jul 29 1986 05:54 | 10 |
|
This word normally relates to painting (a pair of ancient tablets);
but I've seen it used also for books.
Has anyone else seen this usage of diptych ?
|
222.11 | | AKOV68::BOYAJIAN | Did I err? | Wed Jul 30 1986 05:29 | 8 |
| re:.10
I've never seen "diptych" used in this sense, though I've often used
"triptych" for something similar. There have been a number of science
fiction anthologies that contain three short novels based on a common
theme; these I refer to as triptyches.
--- jerry
|
222.12 | | DSSDEV::TABER | Cuidado -- es llamas! | Wed Jul 30 1986 12:23 | 4 |
| I've seen "diptych" used that way in the NY Times book review. I'm not
as comfy with it as I am with the more common "two volume set."
>>>==>PStJTT
|
222.13 | American Automobile Association ? | ROXIE::OSMAN | and silos to fill before I feep, and silos to fill before I feep | Wed Jul 30 1986 18:07 | 4 |
| Isn't a triptych the map thingie that AAA gives you when you consult them
about an upcoming trip ?
/Eric
|
222.14 | | AKOV68::BOYAJIAN | Did I err? | Thu Jul 31 1986 04:54 | 10 |
| re:.13
I think AAA spells it "triptick" as a play on the word "triptych".
A triptych is most commonly used to describe one of those three-
hinged-plate thingies that people have on their desks that display
photos of the spouse and kids or whatever. Specificly, a triptych
displays three pieces or art in sequence that tells a story, usually
of a religious nature.
--- jerry
|
222.15 | | SSDEVO::GOLDSTEIN | | Thu Jul 31 1986 21:23 | 5 |
| "Triptych" is also used to describe the three-paneled paintings
of the German artist Max Beckmann. Some people, however, think
they're unhinged.
Bernie
|
222.16 | Speech impediment? | APTECH::RSTONE | | Mon Aug 11 1986 13:13 | 4 |
| Re: .10
I thought a diptyck was what you pulled out to see how much oil
there is in your engine. :^}
|
222.17 | diptych, triptych... | NY1MM::BOWERS | Dave Bowers | Thu Oct 23 1986 17:52 | 2 |
| Now that we've beaten trilogies, etc. to death, what whould you
call a painting in 4 sections? A tetraptych? (Yugh!)
|
222.18 | .17 | VINO::JMUNZER | | Fri Oct 31 1986 12:42 | 1 |
| Maybe it's a fourposter?
|