T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
170.1 | I have two redund aunts. | OBLIO::SHUSTER | RoB ShUsTeR | Wed Apr 09 1986 12:58 | 2 |
| Personally, I myself believe that the Department of Redundacy should
immediately be abolished right now, I think.
|
170.2 | :^) | JANUS::FRASER | | Wed Apr 09 1986 13:51 | 7 |
|
But if, as it were and so to speak, the whole question or premise
were abolished, if not done away with, totally,completely and
irrevocably, then what would politicians have to say?
|
170.3 | and furthermore, | DEREP::GOLDSTEIN | Flame of the Day Club | Mon Apr 14 1986 14:29 | 1 |
| This topic is superflously redundant, and repetitive too.
|
170.4 | Double double toil and trouble | LEHIGH::CANTOR | Dave Cantor | Tue Apr 15 1986 00:56 | 5 |
| Not only that, but it keeps re-saying the same things over
again.
Dave C.
(Recorded and transcribed)
|
170.5 | | CSMADM::WELLINGTON | Larry Wellington | Fri Apr 18 1986 23:09 | 2 |
| Therefore, all noters should cease and desist discussing this subject.
|
170.6 | | SUMMIT::NOBLE | | Tue Apr 22 1986 13:25 | 7 |
|
re; -.1
Why and what for?
- chuck
|
170.7 | Why? | LSMVAX::BLINN | Dr. Tom @MRO | Tue Apr 22 1986 14:54 | 3 |
| Re: .6 -- Why not?
Tom
|
170.8 | | DONJON::MCVAY | Pete McVay | Fri Apr 25 1986 18:21 | 2 |
| Excuse me, I missed the beginning of this discussion. Would you
all please repeat what you said?
|
170.9 | nothing matters, and what if it did? | CANYON::MOELLER | Still Life in Alphaville | Mon Apr 28 1986 17:46 | 1 |
|
|
170.10 | Say that again... | CHEV02::NESMITH | | Tue Apr 29 1986 12:37 | 2 |
| I want each and every one of you to know that, personally, I find
this note highly superfluous.
|
170.11 | | SERF::POWERS | | Mon May 05 1986 17:22 | 12 |
|
but to the point....
TTL Logic
RAM Memory
IRA Account
Please RSVP
Roast Beef with au jus
any third announcer for a sporting event
- tom]
|
170.12 | 5 a.m. in the morning | STAR::TOPAZ | | Mon May 05 1986 18:50 | 0 |
170.13 | Irregardless... | CANYON::MOELLER | Dial M for Music | Mon May 05 1986 20:01 | 1 |
|
|
170.14 | As opposed to an arson flood | VIA::LASHER | | Tue May 06 1986 19:17 | 2 |
| On the radio news this morning it was reported that the recent problem
at the Los Angeles Public Library was an "arson fire."
|
170.15 | The other day ago... | DELNI::CANTOR | Dave Cantor | Wed May 07 1986 02:38 | 0 |
170.16 | Rat Sexism | FOREST::ROGERS | | Wed May 07 1986 11:49 | 3 |
| I remember reading several years ago that "...sacharine has been shown to
cause cancer of the uterus in *female* rats." I'm glad that those male rats
didn't get it...
|
170.17 | Rat Stuff | GRDIAN::BROOMHEAD | Ann A. Broomhead | Thu May 08 1986 14:12 | 10 |
| Actually, there's a technical reason for that rat limit. You
cannot use rats of mixed sexes, because then you get pregnant rats,
and pregnant rats don't have cancer. They can't get it, and cancers
they have go away.
And, although I was never told this, I suspect female rats are
just a tad easier to handle, at least without any little ratlings
to protect.
Ann B.
|
170.18 | | FOREST::ROGERS | | Fri May 09 1986 15:06 | 3 |
| < Note 170.17 by GRDIAN::BROOMHEAD "Ann A. Broomhead" >
And ther's another technical reason why male rats don't get cancer of the
uterus...
|
170.19 | Free Gift | CSMADM::WELLINGTON | Larry Wellington | Fri May 16 1986 22:59 | 1 |
|
|
170.20 | rain.? | SIERRA::OSMAN | and silos to fill before I feep, and silos to fill before I feep | Wed May 21 1986 11:42 | 6 |
| I actually saw the following sign on a truck in Cambridge:
WATERPROOF ROOFING
/Eric
|
170.21 | Eyesight | VOGON::GOODENOUGH | Jeff Goodenough, IPG Reading-UK | Tue May 27 1986 16:19 | 1 |
|
|
170.22 | After it breaks it's a C-ring | VIA::LASHER | | Mon Jun 02 1986 08:44 | 1 |
| O-rings.
|
170.23 | O-rings vs. C-rings | APTECH::RSTONE | | Mon Jun 02 1986 09:32 | 1 |
| After one breaks it doesn't ring at all!
|
170.24 | Tang retired in favor of Ocean Spray | ROXIE::OSMAN | and silos to fill before I feep, and silos to fill before I feep | Mon Jun 02 1986 11:15 | 12 |
|
re .22: Please, no shuttle jokes !
re .23: Excuse me, does the name "Pavlov" ring a bell ?
/e
|
170.25 | No Salivation Army | TOPDOC::SLOANE | | Tue Jun 03 1986 10:07 | 3 |
| RE: .24
I'm drooling for more of your jokes.
|
170.26 | Where's the bucket? | APTECH::RSTONE | | Tue Jun 03 1986 10:25 | 5 |
| Re: .25
NO SALIVATION ARMY??? What's going to happen to Sandy Claws?
But then, he was sort of a dingaling anyway, I suppose.
|
170.27 | False facts, anyone? | CLOSET::DEVRIES | | Tue Jun 03 1986 14:12 | 1 |
| C'mon, now, let's have the true facts.
|
170.28 | Freak Ittens | CLOSET::DEVRIES | | Tue Jun 03 1986 14:35 | 0 |
170.29 | howoftenareaccidentsgood? | AVANTI::OSMAN | and silos to fill before I feep, and silos to fill before I feep | Tue Jun 03 1986 16:06 | 8 |
| This morning, the newscaster felt obliged, or did his writer, to qualify
the word "accident" and refer to it as an
"unfortunate accident".
/e
|
170.30 | Unfortunately not | TOPDOC::SLOANE | | Tue Jun 03 1986 17:26 | 12 |
| re .29
If your rich aunt died and left you mucho $$$$$, mightn't that be
a "fortunate accident"?
If you had a flat tire, and this gorgeous blonde stopped to help
you fix it and give you other sustenance, mightn't that also be
a "fortunate accident"?
I think you are picking too many nits.
-bs
|
170.31 | Accident = Fortune | APTECH::RSTONE | | Tue Jun 03 1986 17:37 | 9 |
| Re: .29
Have not many of our more important discoveries been made purely
by accident? My dictionary has a definition for accident as meaning
"Fortune or chance." I hope we all have _good_ fortune from time
to time.
"May Dame Fortune smile upon you and that you never meet her
daughter, Miss Fortune." -Author unknown.
|
170.32 | Maybe not .... | TOPDOC::SLOANE | | Wed Jun 04 1986 10:06 | 1 |
| Was it a fortunate accident the day I stumbled onto this notes file?
|
170.33 | most "accidents" aren't | DYO780::DYSERT | Barry Dysert | Wed Jun 04 1986 11:33 | 3 |
| Speaking of "unfortunate accidents" (Eric's .29 was), I was always
puzzled by the use of "accident" at all. I doubt that someone would
drive head-on into a utility pole on purpose!
|
170.34 | | ERIS::CALLAS | Jon Callas | Wed Jun 04 1986 14:45 | 3 |
| re .32:
Only you can say if it was good fortune or bad...
|
170.35 | weow jhf w cvwu bv ! | SIERRA::OSMAN | and silos to fill before I feep, and silos to fill before I feep | Tue Jun 10 1986 16:30 | 9 |
| Some redundant business signs:
Ears Pierced while you wait !
Tatoos made while you wait !
|
170.36 | Rattus Rattus | JAWS::AUSTIN | Tom Austin @UPO - Channels Marketing | Fri Jun 27 1986 16:01 | 5 |
| Re: .17 (rats and uteri)
Most likely species for the research? Rattus Rattus (common rat).
Would it be appropriate, thus, to call certain persons Homo Homo?
Or insapiens sapiens?
|
170.37 | The Most Repetitions For Your Money | BEING::POSTPISCHIL | Always mount a scratch monkey. | Thu Oct 09 1986 21:59 | 11 |
| <<< 2B::NOTES1:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SOAPBOX.NOTE;1 >>>
-< The New SOAPBOX >-
================================================================================
Note 5.14 20,000 words, will travel. 14 of 14
TLE::AMARTIN "Alan H. Martin" 3 lines 9-OCT-1986 18:28
-< n**4 >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consider Torpenhow Hill in Wales. Tor, Pen, How and Hill have all meant
the same thing at different times.
/AHM
|
170.38 | Wot's this ear? | NACHO::CONLIFFE | Store in a horizontal position | Thu Jan 08 1987 09:15 | 4 |
| My co-instructor on a recent course was giving instructions to the
class about an activity which we were about to conduct. At one point,
she said
"...we will hear these examples aurally..."
|
170.39 | At the risk of being redundant... | LYMPH::INGRAHAM | Spare the Rod, Spoil the Reactor! | Tue Mar 10 1987 12:21 | 7 |
|
Its Deja Vu all over again.
(...hope I spelled it right)
|
170.40 | | VIDEO::OSMAN | Hey, does the name Pavlov ring a bell? | Tue Mar 10 1987 16:45 | 0 |
170.41 | :-) | ECLAIR::GOODENOUGH | Jeff Goodenough, IPG Reading-UK | Wed Mar 11 1987 06:35 | 3 |
| Re: .39 Well, almost - it's d�j� vu.
Jeff.
|
170.42 | Trying twice as hard | SSDEVO::GOLDSTEIN | | Thu Mar 19 1987 18:55 | 4 |
| On a recent PBS tribute to Spencer Tracy, Richard Widmark said that
Tracy achieved that style that all actors try to strive for.
Bernie
|
170.43 | | PSTJTT::TABER | Alimentary, my dear Watson | Mon Nov 23 1987 16:06 | 6 |
| On the back of a permit issued by the State of Massachusetts:
"Issued for the use of holder named hereon. Use or possession
except as prescribed by law is unlawful."
>>>==>PStJTT
|
170.44 | Digital University Institute of Technology | WKRP::BRIDGES | RWAST never sleeps | Fri Sep 22 1989 20:28 | 0 |
170.45 | Can anyone answer this exactly? | SHARE::SATOW | | Tue Jan 02 1990 16:01 | 18 |
| This may not be the right note for this, but `Redundancy' is the closest I can
get.
I am looking at a Digital insurance check in the amount of
********EXACTLY EIGHTY DOLLARS AND 00 CENTS********
Can anybody explain why `exactly' is needed? It can't be as filler or to keep
someone from trying to insert, for example, `ONE THOUSAND AND' before
`EIGHTY' -- the asterisks do a perfectly fine job of that.
I think the next time I pay bills, I will write a check for
Approximately Eighty dollars and 00 cents
and see what happens.
Clay
|
170.46 | Dollars and sense | VMSDEV::WIBECAN | Life's not a ogre, but a gruesome moose! | Tue Jan 02 1990 19:27 | 13 |
| I had thought that "exactly" was used for exact dollar amounts, and that one
left off the "and xx cents" part when "exactly" was used. I have since seen it
used for checks with nonzero cents amounts.
I used to work for a software firm that had a check-wording library routine
that wrote things like:
FIFTEEN DOLLARS AND 33/100 CENTS
I eventually impressed on them that 33/100 cents is an insignificant amount of
money, and not at all what they meant.
Brian
|
170.47 | I'll put in exactly two cents' worth. | PROXY::CANTOR | Go ahead; quote my say. | Thu Jan 04 1990 07:19 | 10 |
| re .45
The word 'exactly' is redundant, but it isn't incorrect.
Want to get a personal call from your banker? Next time you need to
write a check for an amount with 50 cents, write it normally in the
figures block, but write the words like "Eighty-three and one-half
dollars." They hate when that happens.
Dave C.
|
170.48 | Reducing Fractions | SHARE::SATOW | | Thu Jan 04 1990 18:07 | 17 |
| re: .47
> -< I'll put in exactly two cents' worth. >-
Don't you mean 1/50 of a dollar?
>Want to get a personal call from your banker? Next time you need to
>write a check for an amount with 50 cents, write it normally in the
>figures block, but write the words like "Eighty-three and one-half
>dollars." They hate when that happens.
I once worked with a woman who was so precise she was difficult to work
with. I once saw a check she wrote for "Twenty-three and 1/5 dollars".
She musta been having an affair with her banker.
Clay
|
170.49 | | THEWAV::MIKKELSON | Quayle+30 IQ points = Howdy Doody | Thu Jan 04 1990 19:31 | 7 |
|
If you really want to aggravate the bank, try writing a check for
"Twenty-seven and one-third dollars"
- snopes
|
170.50 | $.23 isn't an exact amount | TLE::RANDALL | living on another planet | Fri Jan 05 1990 17:37 | 24 |
| But there's a good reason for saying "exactly" xx/100 dollars:
Banks truncate to the nearest full cent when they calculate
amounts. So if your account earns $7.57778 in a quarter, you get
credited with $7.57 and the bank gets to keep the .00778. And
while a few hundredths of a cent won't make diddly-squat
difference in my bank account, a bank can make millions of extra
dollars over the course of the year by keeping the spare change.
These amounts also come up from things like inexact fractions,
computing interest, datatype conversions, etc..
If the check says "exactly" some amount, the account holder gets
to keep the extra fractions; otherwise, the bank gets to take it.
Publisher's Clearinghouse probably saves themselves thousands of
dollars a year by paying out exact amounts.
One of the benefits of the modern era is that bank computer
programmers can embezzle by setting up bogus accounts and
diverting the conversion and truncation amounts there in the error
handling routines. It won't show up anywhere until the amounts
get large enough that the bank notices that some of its own take
is missing.
--bonnie
|
170.51 | | THEWAV::MIKKELSON | Put the pineapple in the can. | Fri Jan 05 1990 19:18 | 12 |
|
> If the check says "exactly" some amount, the account holder gets
> to keep the extra fractions; otherwise, the bank gets to take it.
I don't get it. If I write a check for "One and 28/100 dollars",
there are no extra fractions involved. Once deposited, the check
may earn interest which extends beyond two decimal points, but I
don't see what that has to do with issuing/cashing the check.
- snopes
|
170.52 | | TKOV52::DIAMOND | | Thu Feb 15 1990 12:04 | 32 |
| Furthermore, if I cash a cheque for "One and 28/100 dollars",
I don't get my fractions of a yen. In fact, even if I cash a
cheque for "exactly ten dollars", I don't get my fractions of
a yen (unless the exchange rate happens to be xxx.x0 on that
day).
Thanks to the new tax last year, the one-yen coin is now dundant.
Well,... it wasn't entirely redundant before, but it was almost
redundant. (There, I did it; is that like being almost unique?)
......
If error correcting codes are redundant, are error codes dundant?
If you are notified a second time that your loan payments are
behind, is the second letter redundant?
If you have a C++ compiler, your old compiler is a redundanC?
......
Irregardless of the usual inaccuracy of English signs in Japan,
the signs for geographic locations tend to be rather accurate.
Well, they're simple enough, so they're hard to get wrong.
But they usually incorporate redundancies. For example, the
Japanese name for a street, Meiji Dori, is transcribed as
Meiji Dori Avenue. Dori means Avenue. And a river, Kamogawa,
becomes Kamogawa River. Kawa (pronounced gawa in a compound)
means River.
Well, the States has them too. La Brea Tar Pits. Anyone unable
to guess what La Brea means?
|
170.53 | | COOKIE::DEVINE | Bob Devine, CXN | Thu Feb 15 1990 18:54 | 10 |
| > Well, the States has them too. La Brea Tar Pits. Anyone unable
> to guess what La Brea means?
La Brea == the tar
Boulder, Colorado has a road called "Table Mesa".
There's a (apocryphal?) story about a surveyor who wanted to
find out what the locals called a certain creek. The overwhelming
response was "the crick", so he called it "The Crick Creek".
|
170.54 | Two recent sightings. | SKIVT::ROGERS | Salvandorum paucitus. | Tue Dec 18 1990 21:15 | 7 |
| I heard on the news this morning that a law had been passed in San Francisco
regulating the usage of VDT Terminals.
Last week I heard that Bush and Gorbachev would sign the latest START Treaty
at their summit early next year.
Larry
|
170.55 | U-boat | POWDML::SATOW | | Mon Dec 31 1990 00:51 | 4 |
| The translation of "boat" is included in the German "U-word" from which the
term comes, isn't it?
Clay
|
170.56 | I remember there's some fort in the Sahara... | NEMAIL::KALIKOWD | Ne te lave pas; Je viens!! | Mon Dec 31 1990 01:40 | 6 |
| mentioned in some linguistics text... It was located at some strategic
crossroads... Its name was something like "Fort w x y z" where w x y z
were tokens meaning "fort" in French, Arabic, Swahili, etc., because
every time the soon-to-be-victorious army appears over the surrounding
ridges, they ask the natives what its name is... The rest is
history...
|
170.57 | From the Boson GLOBule 'Literary Life' column, 1/1/1990 | NEMAIL::KALIKOWD | The Maunder Minimum | Tue Jan 01 1991 16:03 | 5 |
| From a review of GOURMET magazine's 50th anniversary issue:
... "If you're a fan of the _haute fuss_ fare served at what Calvin
Trillin generically calls La Maison de la Casa House, this is just the
thing for you."
|
170.58 | %^} | OKFINE::KENAH | There are three sides to every story... | Mon Nov 29 1993 13:14 | 3 |
| WRT Note 1078.*: Perfect!
andrew
|
170.59 | Continuing on . . . | GAVEL::PCLX31::satow | gavel::satow, dtn 223-2584 | Mon Nov 29 1993 13:48 | 1 |
|
|
170.60 | I checked this note for redundancy! | PASTIS::MONAHAN | humanity is a trojan horse | Mon Nov 29 1993 22:58 | 15 |
| One of my pet hates is "PIN number", as used with your credit or
debit card.
While reading back through this string and the entries on writing
cheques I was reminded of my grandfather. When I was born he apparently
took a decision that three guineas was the correct amount for a
birthday present, and would write a cheque for that amount. When I was
in my mid teens the banks started to dislike cheques written in
guineas, so he was persuaded to write "Three pounds and three
shillings". In my late twenties Britain converted to a decimal currency
system, and he was forced to change again to write "Three pounds and
fifteen pence". He never varied the amount, though. I hate to think
what might have happened if the original amount he decided upon had not
had an exact conversion into the new decimal currency
(12 old pence (one shilling) = 5 new pence).
|
170.61 | quotation taken out of context | FORTY2::KNOWLES | Integrated Service: 2B+O | Tue Nov 30 1993 05:59 | 5 |
| (it only works if you've a particularly literal understanding of
con_text_ - which _defines_ a quotation as `that which is taken out
of its context')
b
|
170.62 | PIN --> ATM | NOVA::FISHER | US Patent 5225833 | Tue Nov 30 1993 08:14 | 3 |
| One uses his PIN number in an ATM machine, of course.
ed
|
170.63 | | SMURF::BINDER | Cum dignitate otium | Tue Nov 30 1993 08:41 | 2 |
| ...and then gives his VIN number and his SSN number to the nice officer
who pulls him over for speeding on the way to the RCC church.
|
170.64 | What's A Consensus then? | AKOCOA::MACDONALD | | Mon Dec 06 1993 08:49 | 3 |
| Quoted in the Globe this weekend, an official of the Town of Belmont,
who said, " The consensus, if not the general opinion, is to spend
the windfall on-----"
|
170.65 | The slowest reply I've seen | ATYISB::HILL | Come on lemmings, let's go! | Tue Dec 21 1993 03:41 | 9 |
| It's 21 December 1993, and I'm reading this string...
When I read 170.28 by CLOSET::DEVRIES what do I get from Notes>
Notes> Note 170.28 is being written
Come on, you can't really need 6 years to write a reply?? Can you?
Nick
|
170.66 | | DRDAN::KALIKOW | The Data Highwayman&CyberSpaceShot | Tue Dec 21 1993 03:51 | 3 |
| Well, it certainly would appear that when it's finally done, it *will*
be majorly redundant, at least.
|
170.67 | And what about... | ATYISB::HILL | Come on lemmings, let's go! | Wed Dec 22 1993 04:16 | 3 |
| ... the rivers in the UK called the River Avon?
Avon = river
|
170.68 | Not that I expected any information from them | 4GL::LASHER | Working... | Tue Jan 04 1994 08:17 | 5 |
| Recent weather reports have made predictions such as "a minimum of a
foot of snow or more." At least this is more informative than some of
last week's reports, which predicted "up to 6 inches or more."
Lew Lasher
|
170.69 | | SEND::PARODI | John H. Parodi DTN 381-1640 | Wed Feb 22 1995 05:53 | 9 |
|
About 150 feet outside the ZK2 lobby is the following sign:
Designated
Smoking
Area
JP
|