| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 123.1 | | AJAX::TOPAZ | | Thu Dec 05 1985 19:10 | 4 |
| No, there's nothing wrong with them, except that you can pronounce
them only if you sneeze at the same time.
--Don
|
| 123.2 | | PENNSY::CANTOR | | Fri Dec 06 1985 00:27 | 4 |
| I wouldn't've thought they'd've been allowed.
Dave C.
(Sometimes I write the way I talk.)
|
| 123.3 | | BEING::POSTPISCHIL | | Fri Dec 06 1985 14:22 | 8 |
| Re .2:
> I wouldn't've thought they'd've been allowed.
I'dn't've thought that, either.
-- edp
|
| 123.4 | | PENNSY::CANTOR | | Sat Dec 07 1985 23:05 | 1 |
| touche.
|
| 123.5 | | VOGON::GOODENOUGH | | Wed Dec 11 1985 05:41 | 7 |
| "we are not" is contracted as "we aren't" in the South of England, and
"we're not" in the North. "we're not" is also used in the South, where the
emphasis is on not.
Just in case you're travelling.. :-)
Jeff.
|
| 123.6 | | JANUS::FRASER | | Fri Jan 03 1986 05:25 | 5 |
|
With reference to the title of this note:-
"But the doctor assured me I'mn't having twins!".
|
| 123.7 | | SUMMIT::NOBLE | | Mon Jan 06 1986 12:47 | 4 |
| It looks more like you've all contracted some new disease.
- chuck
|
| 123.8 | | APTECH::RSTONE | | Thu Jan 23 1986 14:08 | 2 |
| As l'ng as you're up to it, whyn't s'mply s'bst't'te all int'rn'l v'w'ls
w'th ap'str'ph's?
|
| 123.9 | | 2CHARS::SZETO | | Fri Jan 24 1986 22:37 | 1 |
| 'n tht cs, why hv vwls?
|
| 123.10 | | ERIE::CANTOR | | Sat Jan 25 1986 18:30 | 6 |
| Wh ndd? W shd mt ll th vwls, ncldng ''.
^ N cs y cn't rd t, tht's th 25th ltr.
^ T's sd hr s a cnsnnt.
^ Ps! N xcptn!
Dv C.
|
| 123.11 | | TOPDOC::SLOANE | | Tue May 06 1986 17:21 | 4 |
| I laughed so hard I almost fell out of the fo'c's'le.
BS
|