T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1311.1 | | TAVENG::FENSTER | Yaacov Fenster @ISO 882-3153 | Sun Feb 21 1993 18:05 | 7 |
| I would guess a combination of the following reasons:
1) Intermarriage.
2) Conversion to Judaism. Over the years there were quite
a few incidences. (Remember the "Megilla" ?)
3) Natural selection.i.e. I would like to see a blond
tribe prosper in the arabian desert.
|
1311.2 | What about the nose? | CSCMA::GILDER | | Mon Feb 22 1993 21:46 | 29 |
| Wouldn't it be the same for all?
My mother's doctor is of Italian decent...very Italian name. He is
tall, strawberry blonde hair and heavenly blue eyes and a strong
pointed nose.
One day he laughingly told my mother that the Vikings raped Euopean
women way back and occasionally a blonde haired, blue eyed, fair
complexion baby would show up.
So it would certainly be feasible that somewhere along the lines the
Vikings landed in Palistine or Jerusulem.
One of my friends who is black told me how many African Americans are
fairer skinned than others is because of how the plantation owners
would visit the areas where the slaves lived and babies were born of
both. This is portrayed in Roots and in Queen recently seen on
television.
But my question is where did the characteristic of the nose being large
come from? As far as I can find out, there were no intermarriages in
my bloodline...so where did I get this tiny shicksey nose and the
typical myopic Jewish eyes. I got nothing to hold up my coke bottle
bottom trifocle lenses!
me
I agree with .1 that a blond in the desert wouldn't prosper in the
Arabian Desert. Wouldn't a darker skinned person stay dark or even
get darker in that area.
|
1311.3 | | BUSY::DKATZ | Have Ramjet, Will Travel | Mon Feb 22 1993 22:26 | 6 |
| 2000 or so years of Diaspora can lead to quite a large number of
additional phenotypes...even if we assume there was a *single*
phenotype prior to the Roman exile...which is a shakey assumption at
best.
Daniel
|
1311.4 | Jewish apples, Israeli oranges | LMOPST::AIDEV::POLIKOFF | LMO2-1/C11 Marlboro MA 296-5391 | Mon Feb 22 1993 23:02 | 7 |
| Being Jewish is a religion not a race. Are all blacks Muslims? Are
all French Catholics. Are all Jews Israelis. Are apples, oranges.
There are people who's religion is Jewish. These people are among
others, French, Italian, Spanish, Chinese, Dutch, Iranians,
Palestinians, Americans, Mexicans, Zulus and some day even Martians.
Arnie
|
1311.5 | Being Jewish is not just a religion... | SMURF::GVRIEL::SCHOELLER | Calendars & Notepads R me | Mon Feb 22 1993 23:39 | 27 |
| .4
Arnie,
There are 3 factors that make your comparison to other religions/races/ethnic
groups inappropriate:
1) Judaism has not (in the last 2000 years) been a proselytizing religion.
You won't see large numbers of people from various ethnic groups joining
the Jewish people because noone has been asking them to.
2) Judaism strongly discourages intermarriage, to the point where many
would have been shunned by their families for doing so.
3) Throughout most of the period of the galut in most locations there were
strong disincentives from the surrounding culture for anyone to join up.
Because of the above, it is reasonable to presume that the vast majority of
Jews have a most of their descent from Jews of the mid-east. However, genetic
factors that result in varied appearance can become dominant in an isolated
sub-group even with a fairly small intermarriage rate.
In the end one must conclude that being Jewish is not JUST religion but bears
many of the characteristics of a race/culture/ethnic group (or as a group of
related races/cultures/ethnic groups).
Gav
|
1311.6 | | BUSY::DKATZ | Have Ramjet, Will Travel | Tue Feb 23 1993 14:27 | 14 |
| Well, those are the "official" postions, yes...but let's be realistic.
My home town (Sharon, MA) is nearly 70% Jewish. In Sharon, there are
*very* few people I knew who looked particularly Semitic. In fact,
most of us looked to be fairly typically Slavic, which makes sense
considering that most Jews of our region are the descendents of
immigrants from Slavic nations.
Two millenia is nowhere near enough time to "evolve" from a Semitic
phenotype without a large infusion of otehr phenotypes over the years.
And of course, that is assuming a single Jewish phenotype prior to the
Diaspora which I believe is shakey at best.
Daniel
|
1311.7 | You took the words right out of my mouth .. | TAV02::CHAIM | Semper ubi Sub ubi ..... | Tue Feb 23 1993 15:15 | 16 |
| Daniel,
You took the words right out of my mouth.
I agree in part with all the replies so far which can explain
for SOME of differences.
But it still remains a fact that Jews from Eastern Europe have
that "Easatern European" look and Jews from Yemen are very
easily recognizable as are Jews from Moroco or Syria etc.
The previous replies cannot explain all of these characteristics.
Thanks,
Cb.
|
1311.8 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Tue Feb 23 1993 16:06 | 1 |
| I think a lot of this can be attributed to what .2 alludes to: rape.
|
1311.9 | Another $.02 | DECSIM::HAMAN::GROSS | The bug stops here | Tue Feb 23 1993 16:55 | 18 |
| I agree with .8, partially. According to Jewish law, the child is Jewish if
the mother is Jewish so in cases of rape, there is no question about the
religion of the child. However, I don't really believe that rape can
fully explain why Ethiopean Jews look just like other Ethiopeans, American
Jews (by-and-large) look just like other Americans, Chinese Jews look like
other Chinese, etc etc etc. Were there really THAT many cases of rape?
Personally, I think that intermarriage has been a lot more prevelant than
the official party line admits. You can read about intermarriage in the
Hebrew Bible itself! I feel that intermarriage and, to some extent,
conversions accounts for the observed appearance of Jews.
One further point. The original 12 Hebrew tribes could well have been
genetically distinct. Some tribes were farmers, some were hunters. I wonder
how Moses could pass as an Egyptian prince if his skin was the same color as
mine? My point here is that genetic diversity is nothing new to Judaism.
Dave
|
1311.10 | We've had red sheep in the family, too. | TAV02::SID | Sid Gordon @ISO | Tue Feb 23 1993 18:07 | 7 |
| > genetic diversity is nothing new to Judaism.
Of course. Genesis 25:25 describing the birth of Jacob and Esau,
sons of Isaac and Rivka, descibe him as red-haired.
That's going back pretty far.
|
1311.11 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Tue Feb 23 1993 18:12 | 28 |
| In hostile environments, I think conversion and intermarriage would be very
rare and rape (unfortunately) would be relatively common. Throughout
galut, hostile environments have been more prevalent than friendly ones.
The Ethiopians claim to be descendants of the tribe of Dan, but it seems
more likely to me that they're the descendants of converts.
The Chinese Jews intermarried so much that they disappeared.
I'm not sure what Americans look like, so I don't understand your comment
that American Jews look like other Americans.
The twelve tribes were all descendants of one man, Yaakov. Of course,
his sons married women from various nations, so this may be the origins
of certain racial differences.
> Some tribes were farmers, some were hunters.
Not racially based. Hunters? Fishermen, maybe, but it's very difficult
to hunt kosher -- you have to trap the animal without injuring it and
then schecht it.
> I wonder how Moses could pass as an Egyptian prince if his skin was the
> same color as mine?
What makes you think he passed for an Egyptian? If you're thinking of
Tziporah calling him an Egyptian, he was probably wearing Egyptian
clothes, and she probably hadn't seen many Egyptians.
|
1311.12 | | BUSY::DKATZ | Have Ramjet, Will Travel | Tue Feb 23 1993 18:42 | 17 |
| .11
I'm afraid that there is a major departure of assumptions here....
I can't really find it in me to accept the Biblical origin stories as
much more than that: collective origin mythology. My understanding is
that archeology supports evidence of several migrations from the
Trans-Jordan region, resulting in the emergence of a loose affiliation
of tribal units called Israel by circa 1200 BCE. But I know of no
scholarly source that credibly affirms the story of the Patriarchs and
the mass Exodus.
So discussing from the assumption that Jewish phenotype variations have
occured since the single originator, Abraham, isn't going to work for
me. Sorry.
Daniel
|
1311.13 | Hmmm | TOOK::ALEX | Alex Allister | Tue Feb 23 1993 19:26 | 26 |
| re .6
> My home town (Sharon, MA) is nearly 70% Jewish. In Sharon, there are
> *very* few people I knew who looked particularly Semitic. In fact,
> most of us looked to be fairly typically Slavic, which makes sense
> considering that most Jews of our region are the descendents of
> immigrants from Slavic nations.
I have never been to Sharon, but there is a problem with your
suggestion. I am not the most able person to describe a "typical"
Semite or a "typical" Slav, but I know that Slavs themselves
have no difficulties recognizing Jews in their midst. In fact
there is a Russian proverb that suggests that antisemites
beat the Jews not based on and about their Jewish documents
but based on and about their faces.
Surely there are many East European Jews who carry some Slavic
genes and some who look like Slavs, but this does not apply
to the overwhelming majority of EE Jews who look like "EE Jews"
and not at all like Slavs.
Finally, what do you mean by "fairly typically Slavic"?
Regards,
Alex
|
1311.14 | I'm confused | CSCMA::GILDER | | Tue Feb 23 1993 21:07 | 28 |
| I'm the first to admit that my Jewish education is severely lacking.
Now, however, I'm really confused. So Alex could you please explain
Semitic Jews or Slavic Jews. Jews are Jews from where ever they come
from.
Again, I may be terribly naive. If not, I am definitely lost. From
where would Semitic Jews originate?
I've been to Sharon many times. In fact, I'll be buried there some
day. I have a second cousin very active in the reform Shul. I've
noticed while there the town appears to be sectionalized drastically.
Seems to a stranger to be very clique types. Those I met were either
very friendly or very rude. Never have met any middle of the road
types.
Sharon may be like most every where. Good/bad/indifferent is all
around us.
Still, back to the original question. What makes Jewish people look
different?
And my question, where did this shicksey nose come from? It's pretty
obvious from where I get my fat a**. My whole family is this way....
All of us have rear ends that leave a room 10 minutes after we do.
:-)
me
|
1311.15 | | TNPUBS::STEINHART | Back in the high life again | Tue Feb 23 1993 22:55 | 17 |
| There are a few Jewish appearance traits that are somewhat common, such
as the large nose, but they are far from universal. The Eastern
European Jewish genetic base is quite diverse.
If the author of .14 REALLY wants to know where she got her small nose,
I'd suggest she look through a family album. ;-) Oh, and she implies
that being short-sighted is a Jewish trait; I never considered this a
Jewish trait.
Genetics is quite complicated in humans. Given even a low rate of
intermarriage and rape, you could still expect to see a proliferation
of types over time. On the other hand, Tay Sachs is a genetic disease
identified with Eastern European Jews (and French Canadians, oddly
enough). So, there is clearly SOME genetic commonality, if only in a
hereditary disease.
Laura
|
1311.16 | social identity is complex | TNPUBS::STEINHART | Back in the high life again | Tue Feb 23 1993 23:05 | 20 |
| RE: .13
>I know that Slavs themselves
>have no difficulties recognizing Jews in their midst. In fact
>there is a Russian proverb that suggests that antisemites
>beat the Jews not based on and about their Jewish documents
>but based on and about their faces.
The ease in recognizing people's backgrounds comes not solely from a
person's face, but from many cues, both broad and subtle, ranging from
clothing to speech, to eye contact (less likely from one who is
socially less powerful), to gestures.
I think if you photographed 100 Jews and gentiles from a given country of
origin, such as Russia, they would be very hard if not impossible to
distinguish, provided that they all wore the same clothes, had the same
haircut and facial hair styles, and looked straight at the camera.
Laura
|
1311.17 | | TOOK::ALEX | Alex Allister | Wed Feb 24 1993 00:50 | 30 |
| RE: .14
> I'm the first to admit that my Jewish education is severely lacking.
> Now, however, I'm really confused. So Alex could you please explain
> Semitic Jews or Slavic Jews. Jews are Jews from where ever they come
I've only used the term "East European Jews", so I cannot possibly
provide an explanation. By "EE Jews" I mean the Jews who live in
Poland, Belarus', Ukraine, Romania, Russia and adjacent countries.
Most of Jews in these areas are Ashkenazim, i.e. "Germans Jews", the
Jews who migrated via Germany since roughly the XIII century. Most
of them have either the German or Polish sounding names.
RE: .16
> >have no difficulties recognizing Jews in their midst. In fact
> >there is a Russian proverb that suggests that antisemites
> >beat the Jews not based on and about their Jewish documents
> >but based on and about their faces.
>
> The ease in recognizing people's backgrounds comes not solely from a
> person's face, but from many cues, both broad and subtle, ranging from
> clothing to speech, to eye contact (less likely from one who is
> socially less powerful), to gestures.
Of course. However, I believe that the facial features of East European
Jews are easily recognizable in the context of the local population,
even if the person in question is dressed as a szlachcic.
Alex
|
1311.18 | believe it or not... | TAV02::FEINBERG | Don Feinberg | Wed Feb 24 1993 10:31 | 27 |
| RE: .16 and others
> >have no difficulties recognizing Jews in their midst. In fact
> >there is a Russian proverb that suggests that antisemites
> >beat the Jews not based on and about their Jewish documents
> >but based on and about their faces.
>
> The ease in recognizing people's backgrounds comes not solely from a
> person's face, but from many cues, both broad and subtle, ranging from
> clothing to speech, to eye contact (less likely from one who is
> socially less powerful), to gestures.
I can't resist relating this story to you.
As is known to some of you, my partner and I have been spending
a large fraction of our lives in E. Europe the last two years.
Significant to the story is this: those of you who know me know
that I am easily "identifiable" -- kippa, full face beard, ...
However, my partner has no kippa, has a goatee - rather European -
and is generally "not identifiable." We think, ha ha. :-) :-)
One trip, about a year ago he was in Moscow. On the way out of the
hotel, in the evening, some woman ran up to him on the street,
and started pointing, gesticulating, and screaming "zhid, zhid...."
Pretty amazing.
|
1311.19 | | TOOK::ALEX | Alex Allister | Wed Feb 24 1993 18:55 | 15 |
| re .18
I believe it. I've been told that in the past it was not that uncommon
to observe some "Aryan" (former) Soviets who would routinely point out
Jews in the streets. As a hobby it seems... The situation was
aggravated during Stalin's years, when general distrust and paranoia
were common, and especially after the "Doctor's plot" when no "honest
citizen could trust a Jew".
Alex
Disclaimer: I am not implying in any way that Slavs in general are
somehow genetically or culturally prone to be anti-semites. Clearly,
the Soviet anti-semitism was politically induced and encouraged
(under the tables).
|
1311.20 | | TNPUBS::STEINHART | Back in the high life again | Wed Feb 24 1993 19:28 | 16 |
| I feel uncomfortable with this discussion, though I don't have the time
(or maybe the patience) to fully explain why. I think it touches a
nerve relating to the very anti-Semitism and Aryan beliefs that have
been alluded to.
I guess I feel that what makes us distinct is not any particular facial
features or other body types, but a unique cultural heritage which may
or may not have some subtle hereditary component in the "neshamah".
I would welcome a personal introduction from Mr. Allister. I just did
a search on note 32, and didn't find him there. Alex, I'm just not
sure where you're coming from, so I don't know how to hold your
comments. Thanks.
Laura
|
1311.21 | I am nice :-) | TOOK::ALEX | Alex Allister | Wed Feb 24 1993 21:30 | 20 |
| re .20
Laura, I do not understand what in my posts makes you feel uncomfortable.
Are you suggesting there is something sinister in my posts? I hope not.
>...Alex, I'm just not sure where you're coming from, so I don't know how
> to hold your comments. Thanks.
My comments are written to be taken at face value and I try to make
them self-contained. I do not think you should be interpreting my notes
based on who I am. What I write, I write without ulterior motives. If
you do not understand what I wrote or meant, pls ask either here or in
email. Furthermore, I make it a point NOT to read 32.* -- I prefer to
learn about noters based on what they say, not who they claim they are.
"Judge me not by the colour of my skin ..."
Regards,
Alex
NB If you insist on titles, and I hope you don't, it's "Dr."
|
1311.22 | | TNPUBS::STEINHART | Back in the high life again | Wed Feb 24 1993 23:55 | 14 |
| RE: .21
Didn't mean to say you aren't nice. I don't know you at all.
A writer's background influences how one interprets his statements,
especially given a paucity of information. After awhile in Notes, one
gets a sense of acquaintence, despite the medium's limited
capabilities. I don't yet have that with you, nor do I know you
personally. This is why I asked to know more about you.
Laura
|
1311.23 | There's no Jewish race! | TAV02::KREMER | Itzhak Kremer @ISO | Thu Feb 25 1993 16:07 | 25 |
|
Jews certainly cannot be defined as a genetic race.
(race has a non-biological definition as well).
The Jews are a nation with their own unique, inseparable religion.
The fact that Judaism accepts converts from all races is proof that
it cannot itself be a race since one cannot change his race by
ritual.
As early as the exodus from Egypt, 'a mingling of nations' joined
the ranks of the newly formed Hebrew nation. Many key personages in
Jewish history are the descendants of converts (King David for
example).
Many Jews possess some 'typical' Jewish characteristics because
these are probably the dominant traits which survived after 3500 or
so years of Jewish history. Since in any generation converts were
*relatively* few and since they would naturally tend to marry
born-Jews, most Jews today are probably de facto somehow descendant
from the original Hebrews. But you can also be a good, legitimate
Jew without a single Hebrew gene. I don't think anyone can say for
sure what is an original Hebrew facial feature and what was aquired
through conversions.
-Itzhak
|
1311.24 | Cohens | SQGUK::LEVY | The Bloodhound | Thu Feb 25 1993 16:44 | 12 |
|
According to Halakah a Cohen is not allowed to marry a convert.
A Cohen also can trace his genetics back to Aharon.
That does not preclude him marrying a daughter of a convert.
I do not find that I can recognize Cohens as more 'Jewish' in their
looks :-)
Make of this as you will
Malcolm
|
1311.25 | | BUSY::DKATZ | Have Ramjet, Will Travel | Thu Feb 25 1993 17:03 | 11 |
| So says a Levite? ;-)
Don't forget that a lot of us who are identified by names as Cohenim
are not. My last name is "officially" a priest's name, but it was
given to my family by Ellis Island. We had to explain this to our
rabbi when he wanted my father to do the first blessing over the Torah
reading a couple of years back.
"Nobody here but us Israelites..."
Daniel
|
1311.26 | Judaism used to do conversions | TLE::JBISHOP | | Tue Mar 02 1993 00:50 | 23 |
| While conversions from Christianity and Islam are now rare, and
most (all?) Jewish sects (branches?) don't proselytize, the ancient
world saw many conversions to Judaism in the centuries before
Christianity got going (source is a Scientific American article).
There were several tribes of Jews in Arabia, as well as the Khazars
in Ukraine, for example.
I have read that before the time of the Roman conquest of Judea it
was already true that more Jews lived outside of Israel than inside.
So the genetic diversity was there two thousand years ago.
Moses most likely was in Egypt during the end of the time of the
Hyksos, who were were non-Egyptian invaders apparently related to
the Jews and other Semetic peoples of the Fertile Crescent. He would
have looked like lots of other people, even if not like a pre-invasion
Egyptian of the Old Kingdom.
Colin McEvedy, in the Penguin Atlas of Ancient History, suggests that
it was the re-establishment of a native Egyptian dynasty that made Egypt
uncomfortable for the Jews and sparked the exodus to Israel.
-John Bishop
|
1311.27 | RE: .9 - Many different shapes and colors | VERGA::STEWART | Caryn....Perspective is Everything! | Mon Mar 08 1993 21:08 | 13 |
| RE: .9
>I agree with .8, partially. According to Jewish law, the child is Jewish if
>the mother is Jewish so in cases of rape, there is no question about the
>religion of the child. However, I don't really believe that rape can
>fully explain why Ethiopean Jews look just like other Ethiopeans, American
>Jews (by-and-large) look just like other Americans, Chinese Jews look like
>other Chinese, etc etc etc. Were there really THAT many cases of rape?
So what do Americans look like anyway?
~Caryn
|
1311.28 | couldn't help it | TNPUBS::STEINHART | Back in the high life again | Mon Mar 08 1993 22:01 | 5 |
| So what do Americans look like?
Overweight, sloppy grooming, wear jeans and tshirts... ;-)
Laura
|
1311.29 | Even more couldn't help it..... | TAVENG::FENSTER | Yaacov Fenster @ISO 882-3153 | Tue Mar 09 1993 00:40 | 8 |
| Re: -1
> So what do Americans look like?
>
> Overweight, sloppy grooming, wear jeans and tshirts... ;-)
You mean Israelis don't you ? :-)
Yaacov
|
1311.30 | look like an American | ERICG::ERICG | Eric Goldstein | Tue Mar 09 1993 09:00 | 8 |
| .27> So what do Americans look like anyway?
Well, I've been told by Israelis that I look like an American. And if you want
more convincing evidence: My brother, while dressed in his Israeli army
uniform, was identified by a total stranger (Israeli) as an American.
I suppose that a Chinese Jew might be equally puzzled if he were told that he
looked like other Chinese.
|
1311.31 | Loud, sloppy, but friendly | TLE::JBISHOP | | Tue Mar 09 1993 21:23 | 8 |
| While I was youth-hostelling in Europe, I could almost always
tell the Americans from a distance: as mentioned, they were
more sloppily dressed. They were also louder, but they weren't
overweight--but this was a select group after all, those who
were willing to go to hostels. The American tour groups were
even more obvious, and they were overweight.
-John Bishop
|
1311.32 | Warning -- Chinese-Jewish joke | TLE::GROSS::GROSS | Louis Gross | Thu Mar 18 1993 01:13 | 9 |
| .30>I suppose that a Chinese Jew might be equally puzzled if he were told that he
.30>looked like other Chinese.
There is the (possibly well-known) joke about the American Jew who was in
Hong-Kong for Rosh Hashanna, and went to a local shule. Everyone there (besides
the American Jew) looke Chinese, but they davened just the way he was used to
back in Brooklyn. At the end of the davening, he told the Rabbi that he was
astonished to find that their davening was just like he was used to. The Rabbi
said "Are you Jewish? Thats funny, you don't *look* Jewish".
|