T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1309.1 | It's in the Torah | DECSIM::HAMAN::GROSS | The bug stops here | Thu Feb 11 1993 21:57 | 8 |
| The fundamental principles of "kosher" are in the Torah. In Genesis, Noah
is told he may eat of any variety of plants and animals. But elsewhere
in the Five Books of Moses, Gd tells the Israelites that only certain foods
may be eaten. We don't know why these rules exist, only that Gd commanded
them. We interpret this to mean that non-kosher food is perfectly good
and nourishing, but that Jews should not eat it.
Dave
|
1309.2 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Fri Feb 12 1993 18:49 | 5 |
| Interestingly, many non-Jews prefer kosher food because they think it's
better in some way. When certain manufacturers have started putting kosher
symbols on their products, they've found that the increase in sales is
out of proportion to the number of kosher consumers. Dannon yogurt
and Coors beer are examples of this phenomenon.
|
1309.3 | side benefits? | MIMS::LOKIETZ_S | which way did he go, George? | Fri Feb 12 1993 20:24 | 12 |
|
Someone correct me if I'm wrong on this (or share additional detail),
but I understand that there are certain rules of preparation and
cleanliness that must be observed for foods to be Kosher. I have heard
that very few Jews fell victim to the Bubonic Plague (middle ages?)
because the Kosher laws helped them to avoid contaminated food (and as
a sidelight, many thought the Jews had found a clever way to cause
everyone but themselves to get sick, and blamed the Jews for the
plague!).
-Steve
|
1309.4 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Fri Feb 12 1993 21:13 | 6 |
| I think bubonic plague is spread exclusively by what bites you rather than
what you bite. I think that the difference was one of personal cleanliness --
Judaism requires a certain amount of washing, unlike most religions.
Animals that are sick or wounded aren't kosher, so that would make a difference
with some other diseases.
|
1309.5 | I eat Kosher meat | UNYEM::JEFFERSONL | Have you been tried in the fire? | Fri Feb 12 1993 22:56 | 5 |
| I myself eat Kosher meats, and I found that it has a totally differant
taste, than the meats we normally eat.
Lorenzo
|
1309.6 | | TAVENG::FENSTER | Yaacov Fenster @ISO 882-3153 | Sat Feb 13 1993 23:04 | 26 |
| Re: .-1
Kosher meat has (possibly) 3 differences from "just" meat.
a) It's source;i.e. only certain animals like cows, sheep, chicken,
goats, but no camels, pork. (Not an exhastive list by any stroke of the
imagination)
b) The method of slaughter. The Jewish entails using a VERY sharp
knife cutting in a certain method by a person well trained.
c) Removing the blood from the meat. This is done by salting and
soaking the meat in a certain way.
The change in taste is almost certainly due to the third part.
Re. a few back:
A possible hypothesis for the enlarged sale of Kosher products is the
Moslem population. The Islamic religion sprung out of Jewish tribes in
Arabia, and Mohamed did many things to try and entice Jews to join his
religon. Only after he failed did he change the direction of prayer to
Mecca (Instead of Jerusalem), and change the day of rest to Friday
(Instead of Saturday). (There are many more similarities, but this
isn't the topic). Anyways one of the restrictions in the Islam pertain
to banning pork, and to a certain method of slaughter. I don't remember
a lot about there method, but I do know that they have no problem
eating meat from Jewish slaughter, and they know that Kosher food will
not have any pork based additives (like lard) in them.
|
1309.7 | digression: about the plague | TNPUBS::STEINHART | Back in the high life again | Thu Feb 18 1993 18:12 | 18 |
| The bubonic plague in the Middle Ages was caused by flea bites. The
fleas were carried by rats. One prevalant theory is that the plague
was brought into Europe by rats on ships coming from the Middle East.
Anyhoo, I haven't read that the Jewish population was any less affected
by the plague than the rest of the population. Rats were prevalent in
everyone's residences. Hygiene might reduce the presence of fleas, but
couldn't elminate them from the environment.
At the time, no one know what caused the plague. After nearly a
millenia of rabid anti-Semitism and absurd libelous charges against the
Jews, it wasn't surprising that anti-Semites thought the Jews caused
the plague.
Now, back to our regularly-scheduled topic!
Laura
|
1309.8 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Thu Feb 18 1993 22:28 | 4 |
| I believe that while Moslems will eat kosher meat instead of halal meat
when halal meat is unavailable, kosher meat doesn't meet all the standards
of halal meat. The animal must be facing Mecca when it's slaughtered
in order for the meat to be halal.
|
1309.9 | my input | CSCMA::GILDER | | Mon Feb 22 1993 22:14 | 51 |
| From the education of Esther Hirshberg Gilder my grandmother and
daughter of a Rabbi.
Testament edicts that one must not eat meat from an animal that does
not chew its cud or have a cloven hoof. Kosher is started by the way
the animal is fed (not fed 'garbage') and is slaughtered by cutting of
the juggler vein supervised by a specially trained Rabbi. Blood from
the animal is 'drained' by a special way of hanging the animal during
slaughter. Grandma said that this was done in order to be humane to
the animal....now that's a translation...she didn't speak English with
the most efficient grammar. Above all else, she emphasized the human
treatment as being the highest of priority.
Meat takes more time to digest than other foods. Therefore, if you eat
meat no other dairy product is to be consumed for I think it's either 4
or 6 hours. I was told by a friend who studied cultures that it's a
good explanation why so many Jewish people are lactose intollerant
similar to Asians because of the de-emphasis on lots of dairy. Martin
Yan in one of his cooking shows said something very similar. He is
also lactose intollerant. He couldn't eat what was being cooked by a
French chef he had as a guest cook one day. That chef was doing a meat
dish topped with butter and cheese. My stomach hurt just watching all
that cheese burying the meet and topped with butter before going into
the oven.
I remember have a guy work for the office as handiman as an intern for
someone I worked for. It put a happy $ or $$ in this guy's pocket. He
was out for several days once. He had come from upper New England
where his mother served steak, mashed potato smothered in butter, corn,
and milk with things like apple pie w/ice cream for dessert.
Breakfasts often were eggs w/cheese. Skim milk was never heard of.
This poor guy spent some several days in the hospital with something
wrong and ended up with his doctor telling him to eat Kosher Sytle. I
gave him some pointers on how to change his eating habits along with a
good cookbook. His body chemistry changed after a while and he felt
better.
On Kosher style, if anyone wants to try it, it's simple.....I think we
lived Kosher until 1972 when my grandmother died. Just simply avoid
mixing meat with any dairy product. Avoid mixing dairies...like lots
of cheese with lots of butter...like anything else moderation is the
key and move slowly into it so that your body adjusts unless you're
informed medically to cold turkey!
On fish, Kosher means no scavenger fishes....i.e. lobster, shrimp,
scallops, crabmeat...
hope this helps.
me
|
1309.10 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Mon Feb 22 1993 23:57 | 4 |
| You can't characterize kosher cuisine as being healthy or unhealthy.
Traditional Eastern European Jewish cuisine includes liberal doses of
chicken fat. Some people who keep kosher eat lots of high-fat, high-salt,
high-cholesterol foods; others eat health food.
|
1309.11 | We are what we eat | TAV02::NITSAN | One side will make you larger | Wed Feb 24 1993 16:33 | 12 |
| > You can't characterize kosher cuisine as being healthy or unhealthy.
It *looks like* at least some of the rules of "Kashroot" (or should I
say "Kosherness"?) had originally to do with health. Considering ancient
times environment, it makes much sense to treat your meat "Kosherly"
or to avoid certain types of meat (and to wash your hands before eating).
Changes in that environment caused some of these rules to generate *less*
healthy food than the average (e.g., more salt). Modern Kosher rules
should probably promote organic or cholestrol-free food...
-- Nitsan
|
1309.12 | chopped liver is making a comeback | TAV02::SID | Sid Gordon @ISO | Fri Feb 26 1993 07:55 | 11 |
| >Modern Kosher rules should probably promote organic or cholestrol-free food...
Actually, Nitsan, among the reasons advanced for kashrut, is the idea
of keeping us separate from the non-Jews (it's hard to marry someone
you can't share a kitchen with, or date someone you can't go to a
restaurant with).
So since nowadays *everyone* is into low-cholestrol diets, maybe
"Modern Kosher rules" should consist of deep-fried and fatty foods. :-)
Sid
|
1309.13 | How many whys are answered? | TAV02::NITSAN | One side will make you larger | Sun Feb 28 1993 11:55 | 7 |
| This is actually a part of much broader subject: Which religious rules
(what's the English for "Mitsvot?") are based on certain logic (whether
ancient or not), and which rules are meant to separate us from the non-
-Jews. It's tempting to find a logic explanation for anything (for me,
at least).
-- Nitsan
|
1309.14 | Marvin Harris | TLE::JBISHOP | | Tue Mar 02 1993 00:59 | 14 |
| Anthropologist Marvin Harris has tried to come up with explanations
of various taboos. You might find his popular work fun to read:
_Pigs,_Cows,_Witches_and_Wars_ (possibly _Cows,_Pigs...), also _The_
Sacred_Cow_and_the_Abominable_Pig_, plus others on similiar subjects.
He doesn't think much of the health aspect, but leans to ecological
concepts (e.g., in the Middle East pigs consume resources that people
use and thus displace people; thus a village could have either 100
people and no pigs or 90 people and 20 pigs on the same resources;
villages that take the former choice tend to win when fighting those
that take the latter, so any belief system that causes villages not
to have pigs will spread...).
-John Bishop
|
1309.15 | Harris makes sense about pig meat | TNPUBS::STEINHART | Back in the high life again | Wed Mar 03 1993 16:58 | 18 |
| RE: .14
Yes, thanks for bringing up Harris' thinking, John. He has an
ecological/anthropological bent. Most fascinating books, by the way.
As I recall, in The_Sacred_Cow_and_the_Abominable_Pig he stated that
pigs live best in damp, cool environments, such as shady woods.
Therefore, most parts of the Middle East are inhospitable to them.
However, portions of the Mediterranean coast (e.g. Israel and Lebanon)
have at times been wooded, and so the indigeneous peoples would most
likely have kept pigs. They may well have eaten pig meat during ritual
meals celebrating fertility.
To maintain their desert orientation and to stress their unique
identity (still the primary reason for kashrut), the Jews had the
prohibition AND strong aversion to pigs.
Laura
|
1309.16 | Lots of Dairy??? My 2 cents re: kosher health | POCUS::FEINMAN | | Mon Apr 12 1993 17:08 | 25 |
| Hi, as someone relatively new to keeping kosher (my husband and I
decided to keep a kosher home when we got married 4 1/2 years ago), I
still have LOTS of questions and occasionally, okay, more than
occasionally, make mistakes. So, please excuse my ignorance, but,
re: .9, that's a new one on me, what exactly is the rule about mixing
different types of dairy, lots of milk and lots of cheese not allowed?
I KNOW I have been violating that one, bad enough I was clogging my
arteries, now I find I was breaking the rules also. Please clarify to
allow me to minimize the damage...
re: .11, I think the explanation in the earlier notes is more
accurate. While dietary and religious laws DID separate us, I don't
think that was their purpose ad abinitio (sp?). Nor was the promotion
of a healthy lifestyle the motivation for kasher laws, it was merely a
sometimes byproduct. We keep kosher because the Torah lays out
specific dietary rules which we are told to follow. No logical or
anthropological rationale is provided there and thus, I can only humbly
conclude that the "reasons" superimposed onto the rules made them
easier to understand and more acceptable to large groups of people.
They are not, however, germane, since those who think it proper to keep
kosher would need no more rationale or reason than that the Bible says
to do so.
Sylvia
|
1309.17 | na'aseh ve'nishma | TAV02::KREMER | Itzhak Kremer @ISO | Tue Apr 13 1993 17:25 | 29 |
| re: .16
> re: .11, I think the explanation in the earlier notes is more
> accurate. While dietary and religious laws DID separate us, I don't
> think that was their purpose ad abinitio (sp?). Nor was the promotion
> of a healthy lifestyle the motivation for kasher laws, it was merely a
> sometimes byproduct. We keep kosher because the Torah lays out
> specific dietary rules which we are told to follow. No logical or
> anthropological rationale is provided there and thus, I can only humbly
> conclude that the "reasons" superimposed onto the rules made them
> easier to understand and more acceptable to large groups of people.
I agree in general but I don't think that the intention of providing
rationales for the mitzvot was in order to make them more acceptable.
IMHO, the rationales are the result of our constant attempt to
understand the ways of G-d in general. (The RAMBAM sees this as an
essential part of Judaism.)
The Israelites first accepted the Torah and then sought to understand
it. (Na'aseh Ve'Nishma)
> They are not, however, germane, since those who think it proper to keep
> kosher would need no more rationale or reason than that the Bible says
> to do so.
This is certainly true, but even if we keep kosher because the Bible
says to do so, we are still encouraged to try to understand the reasons
behind the mitzvah.
|
1309.18 | mixed dairies | TAV02::KREMER | Itzhak Kremer @ISO | Tue Apr 13 1993 17:42 | 9 |
| re: .16
> re: .9, that's a new one on me, what exactly is the rule about mixing
> different types of dairy, lots of milk and lots of cheese not allowed?
> I KNOW I have been violating that one, bad enough I was clogging my
> arteries, now I find I was breaking the rules also. Please clarify to
> allow me to minimize the damage...
Relax. I don't think there is any rule about mixing dairies.
|
1309.19 | | RICKS::D_ELLIS | David Ellis | Tue Apr 13 1993 18:27 | 8 |
| Re: .16
> re: .9, that's a new one on me, what exactly is the rule about mixing
> different types of dairy, lots of milk and lots of cheese not allowed?
This is not part of the dietary laws. The context in .9 is ambiguous, but it
seems to be advice on how to deal with lactose intolerance (rather than on how
to keep Kosher). So there's no new mysterious restriction here.
|
1309.20 | Thank you | POCUS::FEINMAN | | Tue Apr 13 1993 18:52 | 2 |
| Thanks, all, I think I'll order my pizza and milkshakes to be delivered
at the first sign of sundown...garlic bread, anyone???
|
1309.21 | RICE, here I come! | CADSYS::HECTOR::RICHARDSON | | Tue Apr 13 1993 20:28 | 3 |
| I'm going out for Chinese!!!!
/Charlotte
|
1309.22 | RaMbaM was banned | CRLVMS::SEIDMAN | | Tue Apr 13 1993 22:53 | 23 |
| re: .17
As I recall, there were some violent debates over the rationalist
approach taken by the Sefardim (RaMbaM, RaMbaN, Ibn Ezra) toward
explaining the hukkim (the `irrational' commandments). RaSHI, after
all, had argued against providing explanations for this category of
mitzvot, lest it undermine faith. (I don't have my references in front
of me, so I may have some of the details wrong.) If I am not mistaken,
the Ashkenazim went so far as to burn Maimonedes' works.
Aaron
[Glossary:
Rabbi Moshe ben Maimon = RaMbaM = Maimonides
Rabbi Moshe ben Nachman = RaMbaN = Nachmanides
Rabbi Abraham Ibn Ezra = Ibn Ezra
Rabbi SHlomo (=Solomon) ben Yitzhak (= Isaac) = RaSHI
hukkim = commandments about kashrut, sacrifices, etc., for which there
is no obviously discernable reason
mishpatim = commandments prohibiting thievery, murder, etc., the
purpose of which is easily understood.
]
|
1309.23 | | TAV02::NITSAN | One side will make you larger | Wed Apr 14 1993 20:49 | 11 |
| re: .16
> re: .11, I think the explanation in the earlier notes is more
> accurate. While dietary and religious laws DID separate us, I don't
> think that was their purpose ad abinitio (sp?). Nor was the promotion
> of a healthy lifestyle the motivation for kasher laws, it was merely a
> sometimes byproduct.
Perhaps not directly relevant, but the same argument may apply to the
origin/reason for Jewish holidays. Many say they are originally based
on ancient agricultural(sp?) events of the year.
|