[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | BAGELS and other things of Jewish interest |
Notice: | 1.0 policy, 280.0 directory, 32.0 registration |
Moderator: | SMURF::FENSTER |
|
Created: | Mon Feb 03 1986 |
Last Modified: | Thu Jun 05 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 1524 |
Total number of notes: | 18709 |
1243.0. "Meeting the challange" by CRLVMS::SEIDMAN () Tue Jun 23 1992 21:18
The annual meeting of FRCH (Federation of Reconstructionist
Congregations and Havurot) was held last Thursday through Sunday, in
Indianapolis. The theme of the convention was "Living in Two
Civilizations," and we discussed ways in which we could facilitate
living a full Jewish life in an environment that--for most people--
is specifically non-Jewish.
The keynote speaker was Gary Tobin, of Brandeis University, who had a
major role in the 1990 Jewish population study. Tobin pointed out that
synagogue affiliation studies show that only about 25-30% of Jews
are formal members of congregations, about half claim to be. That is,
when individuals are asked whether they belong to a synagogue (and even
when they are asked to specify which synagogue) about half say that
they do, but when these figures are matched against the number of
members synagogues have on their lists, the actual membership is only
about 50% of the claimed membership. Curiously, the claimed
membership, when people are asked to specify to which congregation they
belong, is proportional to actual membership. In telling this, Tobin
observed, smiling, that most Jews "know what shul they should belong to."
In a way, this is discouraging, but it also holds out some hope. That
is, it suggests that there are many Jews in the U.S. who want to
continue to identify as Jews, but whose needs are not being met by
existing institutions. (It is not only synagogues that are losing
membership, but other organizations as well. B'nai Brith is in trouble
and Hadassah is starting to have problems, just to name two.) Tobin
thinks that most of those who identify but do not actually belong,
would join congregations that actually met their needs, but that most
synagogues are organized in a way that makes it difficult to be
responsive. He felt that reorganizing the synagogue has to be a
priority if we are going to reach out successfully.
I found his presentation interesting, but I do not think that the
synagogue is the right institution for managing outreach (although it may
be a good vehicle for delivering outreach efforts). My own feeling is
that outreach has to be based on something broader than the individual
synagogue--it has to be a function of the larger community. This
means, among other things, we first have to worry about keeping Jews
Jewish. Later we can argue about what kind of Jews we are. (I am
reminded of a statement of Rabbi Reuven Bulka, pointing out why
Orthodox Jews need liberal Jewish movements: baalei tshuvah seldom come
from church groups, they come from other Jewish groups.)
An example of what I have in mind is a program sponsored by the
Massachusetts Synagogue Council. The MSC has, for the last half-dozen
years, sponsored "Unity Missions" in conjunction with CLAL. Members of
local O, C, Rf and Rc congregations go on a two-day trip to New York,
where they visit Yeshiva University, the Jewish Theological Seminary,
Hebrew Union College, and the Society for the Advancement of Judaism,
and meet with leaders of each movement. One of the things that came
out of this was a joint leadership training program, in which four
congregations (one from each movement) joined together to run sessions
on managing and planning for a congregation, and using and contributing
to community-wide resources. By helping each other, we build a feeling
that we are, ultimately, part of the same kehillah, and that the
success of each of our congregations is a success for the whole
community.
Aaron
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1243.1 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Tue Jun 23 1992 21:26 | 3 |
| In the orthodox world, many people regularly attend a synagogue without
becoming members. I believe that some shuls don't even have the concept
of "member" -- you give money when you get an aliyah, have a yahrzeit, etc.
|
1243.2 | But we still have to account for the rest | CRLVMS::SEIDMAN | | Tue Jun 23 1992 21:47 | 14 |
| re: .1
That would explain some of the data, but it would not explain it with
respect to Conservative and Reform synagogues. The curious thing,
according to Tobin, was the proportionality they found: twice as many
people reported belonging to specific synagogues as those particular
synagogues had on their books. E.g., a survey might find that 10%
claimed membership in the Orthodox synagogue, 20% in the Conservative,
and 20% in the Reform, out of a community of say, 10,000. That should
work out to 1000, 2000, 2000, but actual membership turned out to be
more like 500, 1000, 1000. (These are not actual figures, but are
solely to illustrate the point.)
Aaron
|
1243.3 | Money talking?? | DECSIM::HAMAN::GROSS | The bug stops here | Tue Jun 23 1992 23:47 | 9 |
| I know that our Reform Temple pays dues to the national organization
proportional to the total "membership". However, not every family can
afford our full membership dues. So our board of directors adds up the
total dues collected, divides by the dues-per-family, and computes the
number of "equivalent" families. We use this number to pay dues to
the national organization. It would sure throw off the statistics if
every synagogue did this...
Dave
|
1243.4 | outreach inside the corporation | TNPUBS::STEINHART | Laura | Wed Jun 24 1992 16:04 | 46 |
| Aaron, I found your statements about outreach to be very moving.
In the course of my work as a leader of our Jewish Constituency Group
(part of DEC's diversity program), I have found outreach to be a major
component.
When I started this organization, I did it to improve the working
climate and to make DEC a more attractive employer to Jewish
candidates. I want DEC hiring managers to recognize and appreciate the
high level of education and commitment in their Jewish employees and
candidates. I have other goals but this one is primary.
Very quickly after formation another goal came out. A number of
non-affiliated Jews became involved. Some are or have been
intermarried. Some are singles. They have told me that they do not
know where they fit in the existing organized community. They feel
more comfortable connecting with other Jews through this workplace
organization. They are tentatively exploring their identities and
trying out Jewish practices, like not eating leavened food during
Passover. Some people, both affiliated and nonaffiliated, have said
that the existing institutions do not meet their needs.
The outreach programs support people's self esteem. Thus, they
indirectly help develop better employees.
When I first spoke to Sherry Israel, the Brandeis professor who will
deliver a workshop at LKG about the demography survey, she expressed
strong interest in the constituency group work. She sees the workplace
as an unexplored method of outreach. The work that we are doing here
is truly groundbreaking.
I don't know how the constituency group will develop. Since this is
the first such program (to my knowledge), it will continue to be
experimental. The support group meetings, in particular, have been
valuable for those who are exploring their identities.
I invite BAGELS readers to participate. We are now developing a
mission statement for a national (international?) umbrella
organization. I hope to stimulate the development of other local
constituency groups. As more people get involved, this will be
possible. Send me your VAXmail address, first name, DTN and site code
if you want to be on the master distribution list.
Regards,
Laura
|
1243.5 | Yes, yes, yes... | CXCAD::BERZON | | Wed Jun 24 1992 19:19 | 6 |
| Arron, the outreach is one area where I can agree with you 100%. :-)
Laura, sounds like you are doing an important job, let me know, if I
can help; I don't have too much time and don't live in Boston, but...
Jake
|