[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference taveng::bagels

Title:BAGELS and other things of Jewish interest
Notice:1.0 policy, 280.0 directory, 32.0 registration
Moderator:SMURF::FENSTER
Created:Mon Feb 03 1986
Last Modified:Thu Jun 05 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1524
Total number of notes:18709

1128.0. "Study of Mix-Marriage Familes" by GUESS::THOMPSON (Mike DLB 5-2/B10) Wed Nov 13 1991 15:31

ARE YOU A CHILD OF MIX-MARRIAGE PARENTS?
	1) Are you single?
	2) Is one of your parents Jewish?
	3) Is your other parent non-Jewish?
	4) Did you live with both parents up to age 17?

If your answer is yes to all four questions, you are invited to participate
in our study. You are likely to find it very interesting. You will get
a summary of the findings by mail. You will earn enough for a decent lunch.
You may help someone earn a PhD!

The four "yes" answers make you part of a special and heard to find
population and we depend on you to contact us at:
	(508) 263-5822 (7am to 11pm)
	(617) 552-2715 (24 hour line)

Say you are calling about the study "Growing Up in Mix-Marriage Families".
Leave your name, number and best time to call. We will set up a meeting
at your convenience.

IF YOU KNOW SOMEONE ELSE WE WOULD ANSWER "YES" TO OUR FOUR QUESTIONS,
PLEASE GIVE THEM THIS INFORMATION.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1128.1!!!!!! YOU CAN DO BETTER THAN THIS !!!!!!!GUESS::THOMPSONMike DLB 5-2/B10Tue Dec 24 1991 22:0621
	Hevrei!

	My wife is doing a PhD thesis on the subject of children
	of interfaith marriages (see note: 1128)

	The note brought in two subjects for her study. Thanks to
	those who responded with some action.

	ARE YOU A CHILD OF MIX-MARRIAGE PARENTS?
	1) Are you single?
	2) Is one of your parents Jewish?
	3) Is your other parent non-Jewish?
	4) Did you live with both parents up to age 17?
	
	OR DO YOU KNOW SOMEONE TO WHOM THE ABOVE MIGHT APPLY?

	If so read the previous note (1128.0).

	Thanks,
	Mike