T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1105.1 | It's business, not a love affair | MINAR::BISHOP | | Mon Sep 23 1991 17:12 | 48 |
| How do I feel?
Well, since I'm one of those poeple who doesn't believe, I have to tell
you that the existence of the Jews doesn't pose any problem for me,
philosophical or otherwise.
Secondly, I doubt the "new world order" is much more than rhetoric;
in so far as it means anything, it means that the "West" won the Cold
war and so is going to use its power to arrange the world a bit more
to its liking. In any case, it's hardly the case that a totalitarian
utoptian system has been created, so you don't have to worry about
your heritage being made illegal, etc.
It is true, I think, that the First World is becoming more secular
(while the Moslem chunk of the Third is becoming less so). Secular
values in a majority can make a non-secular minority feel threatened,
even where no real oppression exists: the lure of consumer culture
is a danger to the continuation of Jewish, Amish or Navajo (etc.)
traditional life as each new generation has to make a choice between
family values and those of the outside world.
Finally, in reply to the second paragraph, I think someone should
point out the implicit assumption you make: that Bush's "attitude"
of wanting to delay making loan guarantees is inhospitable and
not understanding, and possibly unjust. It's none of those: it's
just straighforward international politics.
The US is subsidizing Israel to the tune of four billion dollars a
year, more or less. For this it gets an ally in the Middle East and
some useful intelligence about the area, and field testing of its
military equipment. Maybe it's worth it, maybe it isn't--but it's
a business deal, not a love affair.
Loan guarentees are a subsidy, to the amount the interest rate on
the loan drops. Bush clearly thinks that he should get something
from Israel for that extra subsidy. It's a fair trade if both sides
want to make the deal. But the bottom line is that the US doesn't
owe Israel any money, and Israel doesn't owe the US any actions
(like concessions on peace talks, etc.). From that basis, maybe
some trading can be done.
Consider for a moment the plight of the Amish--is there any place on
earth that is hospitable and understanding toward the Amish people
other than the Amish county in Pennsylvania? Ditto the Navajo and
the Kwatkuitl. The answer is always the same: "Yes, but there are
limits to the hospitality and understanding of strangers".
-John Bishop
|
1105.2 | The time's nigh | SMF2::GOYKHMAN | | Mon Sep 23 1991 18:56 | 81 |
| I'll chip in my 2 cents on this one. I actually agree that the
Jewish people, both in Diaspora and in Israel, is going to be coming
under increasing pressure. There reasons are manifold, and largely
local in every case, but the confluence of all the pressures at this
time makes me believe that there are deeper, underlying causes unifying
the local anti-Jewish phenomena.
The most obvious part of the Jewish nation that's in rapid decline
right now, is that in Russia, USSR, and Soviet Central Asia. In most of
these lands, the latent historical antisemitism, coupled with today's
collapse of the economy and national entities, is causing the increased
physical, political and psychological pressure on the Jews to leave,
fight back, or fully assimilate. The Jews in the former USSR have been
unable to fully assimilate largerly due to the fact that the native
population treats Jewishness as a national, bloodline-oriented trait,
and even "russified" Jews are treated and mistreated as the rest of the
Jews. The Jews are fighting back to some extent, by exerting political
pressure on the new governmental structures, but the main physical
threat is from the "informal" movements such as Pamyat, Islamic
revival, organized crime and so forth. Thus, the appeals to the weak
law and order help little, if at all, when you neighbors are beating
up you kids, drawing swastikas on your front door, and so on. So, the
Russian Jewry is leaving as fast as they can, and engendering even more
hostility by this population movement itself, as all large
resettlements usually do. Many will remain, but most will leave after
the civil war and real pogroms break out - and most believe this'll
happen in the coming years.
The second most obvious leg of the Diaspora in trouble, are the
smaller Jewish communities outside Europe, USSR, Israel and USA/Canada.
These include the Ethiopian Jews, the SA Jews, Balkan communities, remnants
of the Syrian Jewry, South American and Asian communities. Many of
these are stable and prosperous, but very small. Most of the bigger
ones are either emigrating to Israel and North America, assimilating,
or are in captivity. The best illustration of this trend is the
succession of local aliyah waves in the last 12 years, started with the
Iranian Jewry under Khomeini. The most dramatic recent examples include
Albanian, Ethiopean and Eastern European Jewish migrations. I believe
this will continue, and accelerate as the nationalist instability
spreads throughout the world, and Jewish minorities become scapegoats.
The third leg of the Diaspora, the North American Jewry, is at the
pinnacle of its power, comfort and influence. I know this'll sound
strange, but I think right now is the best possible time to be a Jew in
America, not to be traded for what came before - or is coming after.
I think we are seeing the rise of the anti-Jewish backlash in Bush and
Baker, and Jesse Jackson and the various opinion polls. The increasing
media hostility and distortion of Israel, the attacks on the "Jewish
lobby", the pressure to continue assimilating (witness the way the
Lubavitch Hassidim have been described lately), and the general wave of
latent, low-level anti-semitism will continue to grow. It's a long way
down from the place we are at, and it'll take time, but the fall has
started and will probably continue. Might take a generation, or even
more, but the alienation has a tendency to be a compounding process.
I don't know about the Western European Jewry, the final big leg of
the Diaspora. They seem comfortable, if not particularly influential,
except for France. Maybe someone else can fill this gap, and it could
be that these communities will buck the downward trend altogether,
growing and prospering instead (and making this a less-than-worldwide
trend!).
Finally, Israel is both at her strongest and her weakest at the
same time. The population is reaching a critical staying mass, the
economy has reached the poorer developed countries' level, the military
infrastructure is in place as much as it can be, and the Arab
antagonists are wavering in their ability to pay the price of an
ongoing aggression against the Jews in Palestine. However, Israel is
now losing her strongest (and almost the only) ally for the next few
years, the worldwide propaganda wave is separating Israel from the
other democracies and their public opinions, the weapons of mass
destruction are soon to be available to her main enemies, and the
revolutionary ideology of the society is close to crumbling inside the
country itself. Most importantly, the question of Palestine (not to be
confused with the Palestinian question), is about to enter the pre-1948
stage, with a single Mandate Power balancing the scales. Then it was
Britain and its restrictions on Jewish immigration and settlement, now
it'll be US and its pressure to limit Jewish immigration and settlement.
Most importantly, I think, is the fact that the post-Holocaust
sympathy for the Jews is almost finished. A new era is beginning, where
survival of the Jewish people is once again not assured by the world,
and more and more bare-knuckled political/military fights will break out.
The may lead to another Catastrophe, like the Roman Empire's sacking of
Jerusalem, or the Inquisition, or the Holocaust...
DG
|
1105.3 | and what should we do? | TNPUBS::STEINHART | | Tue Sep 24 1991 15:22 | 14 |
| RE: 1105.2
DG,
I wish I could honestly challenge your assessment. Unfortunately, I
think you are correct.
I find it depressing and frightening. Since you have thought this out
so carefully and thoroughly, have you also thought about what we can do
to counteract these trends, at least in the US and Israel? Our
children's lives are at stake. What actions are effective now? (I
live in the USA.)
Laura
|
1105.4 | Pure political pressure is effective now. Money, voice, vote | SMF2::GOYKHMAN | | Tue Sep 24 1991 17:50 | 61 |
| Laura, you've asked a very difficult question, one that I've been
struggling with myself, and by myself, to answer - what is to be done?
I don't have a ready answer, even for me. It'd be even harder to try
and suggest to someone else, so I'll just try to honestly share some of
the conclusions, please forgive me any inconsistencies and ramblings :-)
Most us, religious and non-religious, Zionists and non-Zionists,
probably feel a certain sense of individual helplessness, being unable
to (definitively) affect the overall course of history, or current
politics, or even this particular crisis. Some join pressure groups,
others find solace in the Tora, yet others emigrate to Israel. Most do
very little beyond sending some money, maybe writing some letters, in
the hope that if we pitch in "somebody else" will actually affect the
course of events, somebody who's listened to, or powerful enough, or
radical enough. We try to teach our children the right things, and
sometimes to talk to our neighbors, and perhaps keep up some
traditions. These are all necessary actions, but they are defensive in
nature, reacting to the pressure, and probably doomed to long-term
failure by passivity.
I think, perhaps, the change must start in our own hearts and
souls. It's the most painful part of the process, but we might not have
a choice... The best way I can describe it would be trying to decide
for oneself, whether this crisis is imminent, personal, and
unavoidable. You see, once you understand that it's YOUR children's
lives that are at stake, your system of values tends to change, and
pushing back becomes OK. Once you understand that the Trouble is here,
now, your timescale becomes shorter, and you have to do something NOW.
Once you understand that there is no running, no hiding, it's not going
to go away by itself, you may feel that every action must be taken to
defend yourself, your children, your people... There is an immediate
benefit of such a process in one's soul - the little passive actions
that we know how to do - money, demonstrations, whatever - seem far
more useful and meaningful, a part of the larger existential struggle.
It's a bitter game that we are all doomed to play - there are
winners and there are losers. Jews have been losers in it many times,
and the costs of losing are death, cultural extinction, forced
migrations, isolation, loss of homeland. Jews have also been winners
enough times to survive as a nation through the millenia. Since WWII,
the big Jewish communities in North America, Europe, even USSR have
been living an apparent illusion - a feeling that the survival game
has stopped, that we'll never again face extermination, that somehow
that's not the part of the modern world. We've been wrong.
As far as immediate prescriptions for action, I don't have any.
Only that there are infinite opportunities around each of us to get
involved once we've gone through the soul-searching, and understand
the importance of acting. Let's stop being embarrassed about defending
our people's survival. If we don't have enough info to stand up to
Jew-bashing or Israel-bashing in a heated argument - go after the facts
and find out. If we are not used to seeming "radical" - understand that
we may not have a choice. If we can't spare money to boost AIPAC -
weigh for yourself the alternative of NOT having them lobbying. If we
are afraid for a job, or future promotion - compare that to your
children's future.
I don't know. Perhaps, if we talk about these things out loud,
we'll help each other to figure them out - that would be a great boon
as well. Above are just my thoughts, not meant to preach or guide, just
to be shared. Perhaps, I am wrong, perhaps not. I know, stirring
uncomfortable issues is always a risky proposition, but do we have a
choice?..
DG
understand that the Trouble is here, your system
|
1105.5 | Chutzpah - Similar Thoughts | SWAM2::PLAUT_MI | | Tue Sep 24 1991 21:10 | 13 |
| re .04
Your thoughts are very insightful. I have just completed reading Alan
Dershowitz' new book entitled "Chutzpah". He deals with many of the
same issues of Jews being second class citizens. But he also discusses
what he has done and what he advocates doing to counter this. At the
least, it makes interesting reading. In addition, it could become a
good set of ideas to live by to make this a better world for our Jewish
children and ourselves.
Milt
|
1105.6 | What about here in DEC? | TNPUBS::STEINHART | | Wed Sep 25 1991 15:28 | 36 |
| I would like to explore with you, fellow noters, our experience here in
DEC. Its obvious that there is no Jewish participation in the VoD
(Value of Diversity) program. Is this something we want to do?
There are several strands interwoven here.
One, we suffered from negative quotas (university admissions, etc.)
until recently. Jews never sought participation in affirmative action
programs.
Two, it's interesting to note that we are never formally identified as
a minority in the US - on census forms, on DEC's personnel records,
etc. We did not seek this. I guess we've done pretty well by
assimilating (in appearance anyway). I guess we fear this
identification more than we think we'll benefit from it.
Three, we maintain a low profile here at DEC, the exception being those who
are openly kosher, wear a kipa, leave early Fridays, etc.
Given all the baggage, and the existing anti-Semitism just below the
surface (yes, in DEC as elsewhere in society), is it to our advantage
to sponsor VoD events? If we asked Alan Dershowitz, he'd no doubt say
yes. After all, with events for homosexuals, Hispanics, Blacks, and
the deaf, why not? But. . .
It's a good time to discuss this. March is an ideal time for VoD
events for us, since it's a month before Passover. We can sponsor a
model Seder and perhaps have other associated events such as films,
speakers, musicians, storytellers. There's no lack of speakers or
materials. (By the way, I work in Littleton.) If it's something we
want to do, we can start planning now.
I have a lot of emotion about this, both ways. What do you think?
Tentatively,
Laura
|
1105.7 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Sep 25 1991 18:23 | 18 |
| re .1:
> Loan guarentees are a subsidy, to the amount the interest rate on
> the loan drops.
That depends on how you define "subsidy." If a subsidy is a payment
(which is how the two dictionaries I've looked in define it), then
a loan guarantee isn't a subsidy. If Israel defaults on the loans,
then you might be able to argue that it's a subsidy.
> Consider for a moment the plight of the Amish--is there any place on
> earth that is hospitable and understanding toward the Amish people
> other than the Amish county in Pennsylvania?
Rabbi Avraham Twerski, in his book "Generation to Generation," tells a story
about a Hasid being harrassed by an anti-religious Jew. He told him that he
wasn't a Hasid, he was Amish. The anti-religious Jew said, "Oh, I'm sorry.
You know, I've always admired how you people have kept your identity..."
|
1105.8 | America? Naaaah.... | SUBWAY::STEINBERG | Anacronym: an outdated acronym | Wed Sep 25 1991 22:36 | 75 |
|
Re: .2
A few comments on your excellent -albeit frightening- insights.
>Russian Jewry is leaving as fast as they can, and engendering even more
>hostility by this population movement itself, as all large
>resettlements usually do. Many will remain, but most will leave after
>the civil war and real pogroms break out - and most believe this'll
>happen in the coming years.
There was an excellent article in The Forward this past week, regarding
the Yeltsin/Pamyat connection. In a nutshell, Yeltsin is known to have
met with Pamyat's leaders many times in 1987, and a few weeks ago, when
asked what he planned to do about the resurgence of Jew-hatred he
equivocated.
Is it possible that the man who stood up singlehandedly to the Communist
party, the KGB and the army only a few weeks ago is *afraid* of taking
a stand against Pamyat? The author offers several theories about his
thinking, but the possibility that rings most true is that Yeltsin's
sentiments are at least not strongly philo-Semitic, or at least that
he senses that Jew-hatred is so deeply rooted in the Russian psyche,
that his own political days would be numbered would he take a firm
position on anti-Semitism.
>right now is the best possible time to be a Jew in
>America, not to be traded for what came before - or is coming after.
Your words are undoubtedly unnerving to most, and many are likely
to write them off as alarmist and extreme. But the come from the
"pen" of an individual with keen historical insights, rooted no doubt,
in personal experience.
>the pressure to continue assimilating (witness the way the
> Lubavitch Hassidim have been described lately),
Ed Koch quoted a "Jewish leader," who insisted on anonymity,
as explaining that one of the reasons for the Jewish Establishment's
deafening silence in the face of America's first pogrom is the fact
that it was the anachronistic (read: embarrassing) Lubavitchers
who were on the firing line. *We*, first and foremost, are our own
worst enemies.
>Maybe someone else can fill this gap, and it could
>be that these communities will buck the downward trend altogether,
>growing and prospering instead (and making this a less-than-worldwide
>trend!).
Well, I guess we disagree on something. Have you forgotten that Germany
is reunited? Have you missed the reports about the death-camp video
games? Do you think that _The Protocols_ is less popular today in
Central Europe than it was 60 years ago? The fatal "mistake" that Jews
always make is their nasty habit of "growing and prospering" - if there
are live Jews around, there will be jealous gentiles to "right" those
"wrongs."
>Most importantly, I think, is the fact that the post-Holocaust
>sympathy for the Jews is almost finished.
The "symapathy package" is stamped with a 45-year expiration date.
We're on our own once again.
>The may lead to another Catastrophe, like the Roman Empire's sacking of
>Jerusalem, or the Inquisition, or the Holocaust...
Pleasant thoughts, but they lead me to suspect that you've been
secreting peeks at the Talmud's descriptions of the events to
precede the messianic era.
Jem
|
1105.9 | You have to participate | CRLVMS::SEIDMAN | | Thu Sep 26 1991 02:49 | 18 |
| re 1105.6
There has, indeed, been Jewish participation in VoD--at least at my
site. (Well, actually, my former site--I've just moved to a new job at
a new location.)
Our site formed a VoD group at DIM&T headquarters about three years ago
and we've been fairly active (enough to get DIM&T Recognition Award).
Although we haven't run a program specifically about Jews or Judaism,
we have made a point of keeping site personnel informed about holidays,
etc., and programs that have mentioned DEC in an international context
have included reference to our offices in Israel.
One has to be willing to take the time to educate people.
Aaron
"I am not for myself, who will be? If I am only for myself, what am I?"
|
1105.10 | the silence is deafening | TNPUBS::STEINHART | | Mon Oct 07 1991 15:33 | 33 |
| RE: -1
Supplying the dates of Jewish holidays (to avoid scheduling conflicts)
is certainly a necessity.
I can't help but notice the lack of enthusiasm here for actual
programming (not just in previous reply, but others as well).
I think the other consideration we have is the old conundrum: Is
Judaism a religion or an ethnic identification?
Of course it is both. I don't think this conundrum needs more
discussion. But here's what's relevant: In the USA we have pushed the
Judaism as Religion aspect to the forefront. This has helped in our
mainstream acceptance, especially in the job market. So. If Judaism
is "just another religion", there's no need to do VoD programming, is
there? To date, there has been NO VoD programming on religions - only
on ethnic, racial, and homosexual differences.
Again, do we want to call attention to ourselves? If we do a VoD
program, does that mean that we are NOT "just another religion" but
indeed an ethnic group? If the "just another religion" tactic has
worked well, should we avoid VoD programming? Will VoD programming
actually create more antagonism than it removes?
It's hard for non-Jews to understand, but anti-Semitism is more
ancient, and more rooted in Western culture, than antagonism to the
other VoD groups (arguably).
I would welcome further discussion on this. I want to tread very
carefully in proceeding here in Littleton. Please share your ideas.
Laura
|
1105.11 | Do it | MTWREV::GOYKHMAN | | Mon Oct 07 1991 18:04 | 7 |
| Laura, I personally think a Jewish component to VoD is a great
idea. Wouldn't really know how to set it up though. I think both the
ethnic history, religious aspects, culture - all those deserve to be
talked about. Anti-semitism can be an important side issue, for I doubt
that it's a central point of most US Jews existence.
DG
|
1105.12 | Religion has been done | TECRUS::KRAVITZ | You got lipstick on my dog! | Mon Oct 07 1991 19:20 | 3 |
| There was a program (luncheon + lecture) on Islam, in HLO a while back.
/dk
|
1105.13 | As Hillel said... | CRLVMS::SEIDMAN | | Thu Oct 10 1991 01:35 | 26 |
| There are two components to successful VoD work:
1. "If I am not for myself, who will be?"
2. "If I am only for myself, what am I?"
You have to be willing to speak up on issues relevant to Jews and you
have to be willing to speak up in support of others. That will earn
both respect and allies.
One thing that I have found effective is not to assume that something
that appears anti-Semitic is necessarily the result of bias; I
generally respond to people who voice such things as if their comments
are due to ignorance. Thus, my approach is to educate, not castigate.
This has two advantages: First, the person whose behavior I want to
change is more open and less defensive to my response, and therefore
finds it easier to change. Secondly, the people around us often
reinforce what I am saying, creating social pressures against
prejudice.
Also, by being prepared to speak up against any form of prejudice I try
to set an example for others. I have seen this pay off in a situation
where someone voicing an anti-Semitic remark was immediately corrected
by someone non-Jewish with whom I had worked. I didn't have to say
anything.
Aaron
|
1105.14 | A splash of cold water | TNPUBS::STEINHART | | Tue Oct 15 1991 16:29 | 19 |
| I discussed the idea of Jewish VoD programming with one of the senior
US VoD people. This was her response:
YES! Do it. Go ahead.
She stated several significant observations. She said that in speaking
with Jewish managers here at Digital, they have told her there is a
"glass ceiling". This is so sad, although not surprising. She also
stated the popular perception that "Jews are the least 'white' of all
the minority groups except Blacks". (USA context)
Maybe all our quibbles about Judaism as "just another religion" versus
Judaism as an ethnic group, are irrelevant in the face of this
information. OTHERS view as as Jews (the whole package) no matter what
fine distinctions we make among ourselves.
Sigh. . .
Laura
|
1105.15 | What evidence did she have for that statement? | MINAR::BISHOP | | Tue Oct 15 1991 17:41 | 33 |
| re .14, relative rankings of minority groups
That sounds quite odd to me: I'd think it would be more like this:
Light-skinned Europeans <-- Jews fit in here...
Dark-skinned Europeans <-- or in here, depending on appearance
Asians
Indians
Dark-skinned Hispanics
Native Americans
Blacks
Given that you can't see jewishness instantly, but can see skin color
instantly, and that the "ranking" system of America is overwhelmingly
based on skin color, it seems unlikely that your informant is correct.
re .14, "glass ceiling"
I suspect that everyone finds promotion to the very top to be
difficult; logically it's clear that only a very tiny minority
of qualified people will be there (as for movie stars, rock stars,
presidents and astronauts, there are thousands of eager, qualified
people for every opening).
I therefore tend to discount complaints about a "glass ceiling"
unless there's more than anecdotal evidence for discriminatory
promotion.
re various, VoD
Sure, why not? It's not really about ethnicity, but about diversity
of any kind.
-John Bishop
|
1105.17 | We have any shade you want! | TAVIS::BARUCH | in the land of milk and honey | Wed Oct 16 1991 10:59 | 36 |
| Re 1105.15
John
> That sounds quite odd to me: I'd think it would be more like this:
>
> Light-skinned Europeans <-- Jews fit in here...
> Dark-skinned Europeans <-- or in here, depending on appearance
> Asians
> Indians
> Dark-skinned Hispanics
> Native Americans
> Blacks
Come to Israel and you will see that we have Jews to fit every shade on the
scale from blond to dark ebony, and I would have thought that at least a few
of every shade will have found their way to that great "melting-pot" the USA.
Personally, I object to classification by the colour of skin. I am not white.
My skin usually ranges in colour from pink to a light brown depending on how
long I spend in the sun. Today it is a little pasty as I have a cold!
> Given that you can't see jewishness instantly, but can see skin color
> instantly, and that the "ranking" system of America is overwhelmingly
> based on skin color, .......
Sad. That "ranking" system could make one prefer a return to the old British
upper, middle and lower class ranking.
> I therefore tend to discount complaints about a "glass ceiling"
> unless there's more than anecdotal evidence for discriminatory
> promotion.
Agreed.
Shalom
Baruch
|
1105.18 | Descriptive, not prescriptive | MINAR::BISHOP | | Wed Oct 16 1991 17:03 | 21 |
| I do hope readers understood that I do not support such a ranking;
I was trying to describe the current American prejudices from the
outside, in an anthropological manner.
It was my understanding that the personnel person quoted indirectly
was making the same kind of descriptive statement, again with no
prescriptive intent. That statement seemed to me not to describe
American prejudice correctly.
While I could go on for some time about class and race, etc. based
on my knowledge of anthropology, that's not the issue. I think
the real issue is "to what extent does prejudice cause career damage
to Jews (or other groups)". My personal judgement is that the extent
is low; others believe it to be high.
It's important to note that even if most Americans are not very
prejudiced, the "ranking" may still be widely known as another item
of shared cultural data, like the names of the seven dwarfs in
_Snow_White_, or the names of the Presidents.
-John Bishop
|
1105.19 | | TAV02::FEINBERG | Don Feinberg | Sun Oct 20 1991 11:20 | 10 |
| Worse...
I remember, some years ago, there was an attempt to do a VoD program on Judaism.
Of course, they found some Reform Rabbi to come in, as the event was scheduled
on Yom Tov.
VoD indeed. WE should look to ourselves.
don
|
1105.20 | Enough dithering | TNPUBS::STEINHART | | Wed Oct 23 1991 16:04 | 50 |
| RE: -1
"THEY found some Reform rabbi" (caps my own)
Yes. This is exactly the problem. THEY are not going to do a VoD
problem on Judaism, and even if THEY do, it will be inaccurate.
WE will do the VoD program, and WE must get it right.
Given the wealth of ideas, speakers, films, musicians, story tellers,
and other available resources, and the knowledge within the Digital
Jewish community, the only element lacking is the will to do it.
Most gentiles are not going to seek out information on Jewish history or
Judaism. People are busy with their lives and their own concerns.
Most gentiles are aware that they know little about us, but do not
realize that they hold misconceptions. They have little or no
opportunity to learn more or correct misconceptions.
Unless we provide knowledge and positive experiences, we cannot expect
change. There are demagogues and extremists among the Gentiles, and
that is nothing new. But the majority are well meaning, if ill
informed. The extremists will remain close-minded, but the majority
can be reached with education.
There is a need in the Jewish political community for political
confrontation and bold action. But within Digital, the need is for
education, to which many will be highly receptive.
I am making myself available as a focal person for programming in the
Littleton, Massachusetts area. If you want to participate in planning
some events, distributing a calendar of Jewish holidays (to avoid
scheduling conflicts), and any other work which can be done, get in
touch with me. Contact me if you work anywhere within 60 miles of this
location. That includes southern New Hampshire, Boston, and Maynard.
This individual is standing up and will be counted. Will you?
The buck stops here. Do it now.
Laura Steinhart
PS: If anyone has an on-line file of Jewish holiday dates for the next
12 to 24 months, please send it to me for distribution here at LKG.
Please also post it here so others can send it to management at their
site locations. If you have a paragraph describing the sunset
beginning of holidays and Shabbat, and the need to avoid scheduling at
that time, please send it and post it. If not, I'll write my own and
put it here. Thanks!
|
1105.21 | | VSSCAD::MAYER | Reality is a matter of perception | Wed Oct 23 1991 16:14 | 12 |
| > PS: If anyone has an on-line file of Jewish holiday dates for the next
> 12 to 24 months, please send it to me for distribution here at LKG.
> Please also post it here so others can send it to management at their
> site locations. If you have a paragraph describing the sunset
> beginning of holidays and Shabbat, and the need to avoid scheduling at
> that time, please send it and post it. If not, I'll write my own and
> put it here. Thanks!
Someone was just asking in this notes conference about a program which
can do this. Check the last few topics.
Danny
|
1105.22 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Oct 23 1991 18:31 | 3 |
| The Orthodox Union has a calendar of Jewish holidays for the next 10 or 20
years. It explains what activities are restricted on the holidays. It seems
to be explicitly aimed at providing information to employers and the like.
|