| re: .0:
... The purpose of the
show is to bring the Jewish perspective to the media. Host Roger Baskin
states that the show is needed because the media have distorted issues
important to the Jewish Community, especially in regard to Israel.
...
"I have two particular
questions I would like to ask Senator Wellstone" states Baskin. "First, how
could the son of a Jewish Russian emigrant support someone who is widely
perceived as anti-Semitic? Second, what if there is a PLO state and Israel
is destroyed as a result. How would he feel if he helped bring this about?"
Ahem. There is an interesting contrast between these two paragraphs.
First, I find it distasteful that Baskin assumes Jews should be more
opposed to antisemitism than non-Jews. Would Baskin ask, say, a Christian
who believes that Yassar Arafat is the chosen leader of the Palestinians
how that person, as a Christian, could support someone who is widely perceived
as anti-semitic? Or is it taken as a given that Christians are expected
(allowed) to be insensitive to anti-semitic issues.
One fondly hopes that, when Baskin interviews someone strongly opposed to
the creation of a Palestinian State, he might also ask that person
"How would you feel if your *opposition* to a settlement of the Palestinian
issue led to the destruction of Israel."
It would be nice to see a counter to the media's distortion of issues
important to the Jewish Community, but Baskin -- judged from the
press release -- does not seem to be offering any solution to the problem.
Martin.
|
| RE: .1:
> First, I find it distasteful that Baskin assumes Jews should be more
> opposed to antisemitism than non-Jews. ...
> Or is it taken as a given that Christians are expected
> (allowed) to be insensitive to anti-semitic issues.
Okay, how about this: Jews, the direct victims of antisemitism,
are more sensitive to it than gentiles. Thus, a gentile view of
Jesse Jackson could be that of someone who has dedicated his life
to the struggle for civil rights in America. The Jewish view of
Jesse Jackson, tempered by heightened sensitivity to antisemitism,
is very strongly influenced by Jackson's embrace of Arafat, his
friendship and association with professional Jew-hater Louis
Farrakhan, and by his very revealing "Hymietown" remark. Baskin
is right in wondering how, as a Jew, Senator Wellstone could turn
a blind eye to this and become Jackson's campaign manager.
> One fondly hopes that, when Baskin interviews someone strongly opposed to
> the creation of a Palestinian State, he might also ask that person
> "How would you feel if your *opposition* to a settlement of the Palestinian
> issue led to the destruction of Israel."
Clearly Baskin opposes the creation of a PLO state as a danger
to Israel. I don't see how this implies that he is opposed to a
settlement of the Palestinian issue. He just opposes the most
risky settlement possible. Again, Baskin sounds reasonable to me.
> It would be nice to see a counter to the media's distortion of issues
> important to the Jewish Community, but Baskin -- judged from the
> press release -- does not seem to be offering any solution to the problem.
The press release seems quite promising to me. The JNN sounds
like blessed relief to the Boston Globe's anti-Israel tilt.
-- Bill B.
|