T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
795.1 | Hamas covenant | SUBWAY::STEINBERG | | Tue Oct 10 1989 18:12 | 68 |
| As if more evidence is needed, I include the following self-explanatory
article. Thanks again to Don Feinberg (wherever you are!).
The Simon Wiesenthal center has just announced that they have a copy
of the "Hamas" covenant. The official title of this covenant is
"Charter of the Islamic Resistance Movement -
Hamas
Gaza, August, 1988"
The Wiesenthal Center has published translations of key passages of
this "Hamas Covenant". It is a forty page manifesto from a key group
involved in the Intifada. Among its key points are (direct quotes):
o "The Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) feels that the land of
Palestine is a trust which belongs to Islam throughout the
generations until the day of resurrection ... no one is allowed
to compromise on this land ..." (page 11)
o "There is no solution to the Palestinian question, but through
Jihad" (Holy War) ... (page 14)
o "Our enemies ... gained control of the international media
beginning with news agencies, newspapers, and publishing houses.
Broadcasting stations .. with their money they have detonated
revolutions in different parts of the world ... (including) the
French Revolution ... the Communist Revolution . they have
created secret organizations which spread throughout the world in
order to destroy societies and to achieve Zionist interest; such
as the Free Masons, the Rotary, and the Lions Club." (page 24)
o "They were behind World War I ... World War II, where they made
enormous profits from speculation ... There is no war anywhere in
which their fingers do not play ..." (page 25)
o "After Palestine, they (Zionists) aspire to further expansion.
Their plan is the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and their
present conduct testifies to the truth of what we say." (page 35)
The Wiesenthal Center has forwarded copies of the document to every
member of Congress, the Canadian Parliament, and to key European
Parliaments. The Cnter has urged our own government to instruct our
diplomatic postings in the Middle East to monitor and protest the
increasing use of antisemitic rhetoric and publications throughout the
Middle East.
In response to the Center's initiative, U. S. Senator Pete Wilson
(R-CA) wrote to U. S. Secretary of State George Shultz:
"I strongly encourage you to review this document and to
instruct the appropriate State Department diplomats to take up
the matter of Arab anti-semitism in their ongoing discussions
with Middle Eastern leaders. It seems clear that a peaceful
Page 2
resolution of the various conflicts in the region will become
ever more elusive if the prescription for warfare and
intolerance outlined by the IRM (Islamic Resistance Movement)
Charter emerges as the dominant strategy throughout the Arab
World."
|
795.2 | Can't Trust Those Masons | ABE::STARIN | Ayuh.....seen bettuh | Wed Oct 11 1989 09:24 | 7 |
| Re .1:
I am truly thankful that the Hamas Covenant has helped me to better
understand the part Freemasonry plays in the "International Zionist
Conspiracy"!
Mark
|
795.3 | Murder - No Other Way To Describe It | ABE::STARIN | Ayuh.....seen bettuh | Wed Oct 11 1989 10:22 | 5 |
| Re .0:
Senseless....absolutely senseless.
Mark
|
795.4 | Scary. . . | WAV14::STEINHART | | Wed Oct 11 1989 13:27 | 9 |
| The Lions and the Rotary??!!!??
I don't know whether to laugh or cry.
How interesting - (See my reply to previous NOTE) that segments
of the Palesinian movement assume the old rhetoric of Christian
anti-Semitism. Wonder who's giving them lessons?? Is anything
known about possible ties to Nazi groups?
|
795.5 | Could you elucidate? | SUTRA::LEHKY | I'm phlegmatic, and that's cool. | Mon Oct 16 1989 11:28 | 12 |
| As far as I'm being told, "Christians" have as much to do with "Nazis"
as "Jews" have to do with "International free-masonic conspiracy".
One more: there is no "christian" anti-semitism. It's a contradiciton
in terms, so I'm told.
Who's giving them lessons? You're already suggesting the answer. Mind
coming up with some supporting facts?
Doubtfully yours,
Chris
|
795.6 | Some Old Lies Revisited | ABE::STARIN | The inmates are running this asylum! | Mon Oct 16 1989 14:03 | 40 |
| Re .5:
Hi Chris:
The sad truth is many Nazis were (and are) Christians. This is not
to say that if a person is/was a Christian that they were necessarily a
Nazi. While not great in number, there were enough German Christians
who stood up to the Nazis during the Third Reich to at least be
noted in the history books albeit posthumously.
During the Third Reich, many German church leaders bought into the
Nazi movement and urged their parishoners to support Hitler. By
supporting the Nazi cause, they were doing G_d's work on earth;
it was almost a Christian duty to do so.
As far as the "International Jewish/Freemasonry Conspiracy" is
concerned, this was an invention of Dr. Goebbels who probably lifted
it from the Dreyfus Affair of the late 19th century. According to
Nazi propaganda, the Freemasons were agents of the Jewish Conspiracy
and were a danger to the Third Reich because they spread Jewish
propaganda. Franklin D. Roosevelt was a Mason and the Nazis claimed
that as evidence that he was an element of the "conspiracy".
Supposedly, again according to Nazi propaganda, Roosevelt was really
Jewish and his real name was, get this, Rosenfeld but had been changed
so that his role in the "conspiracy" would not be as apparent. And
of course the Masons were a "secret" society that promoted such
anti-Nazi ideals as universal brotherhood, equality, and charity so
that made them instantly suspect as far as the Nazis were concerned!
While anti-semitism may seem out of place in Modern Christianity,
it certainly had a place in church doctrine until the 19th centruy
in some places (Spain, Portugal). It really reached its peak during the
Spanish Inquisition but ripples from early church teaching against
Judaism are still found in the Christian Bible although to a large
extent they go unnoticed.
I agree with Laura - sounds like the IRM "borrowed" Nazi propaganda
from 50 years ago and are basically rehashing old lies.
Mark
|
795.7 | Nuances make up all the differences | SUTRA::LEHKY | I'm phlegmatic, and that's cool. | Tue Oct 17 1989 11:45 | 11 |
| See, the issue is that with generalizing statements, you simply turn
people away who might be willing to support Jewish causes.
I'm not saying that "many Nazis were Christians" is wrong. I'm saying
that "Christian Nazi doctrines (or alikes)" is a term not to choose.
That's all.
Yours,
Chris
|
795.8 | an important distinction | NUTMEG::PULKSTENIS | Spirited spirit, free indeed! | Mon Oct 23 1989 00:05 | 48 |
| Re: .5
Chris, 'christian anti-semitism' is, indeed a contradiction.
There is no such thing among Christians who understand their
Scriptures. By understand, I don't mean intellectually. I mean
spiritually, in their hearts. One can know intellectually,
but be blind spiritually.
This is illustrated in Mark's statement:
>The sad truth is many Nazis were (and are) Christians. This is not
>to say that if a person is/was a Christian that they were necessarily a
>Nazi. While not great in number, there were enough German Christians
>who stood up to the Nazis during the Third Reich to at least be
>noted in the history books albeit posthumously.
The former were the 'intellectuals', but spiritually blind. The latter
were those in whom the teachings had penetrated to the innermost
being to where they saw the spiritual truth, and were willing
to stand up for it and die for it. G-d's word was written where
in changed them: on their hearts.
I know you've often heard the argument that those who participated/
supported Hitler "were not real Christians", and you may be sick
of it by now. I do think it's important to try to understand
this. There is a "Christianity" in name only, and Christianity
that has a spiritual dimension experience. True Christianity is a
living, dynamic relationship with G-d, not just a "religion". It
is a state of _being_ that is expressed outwardly in doing good.
Those who have it are changed by it. Those who don't, have 'religion',
and are referred to as 'professing' Christians [i.e., born into a
family and therefore Christian by name]. It's like a title that
goes with the family...conveyed by tradition and custom. It's
worn like a badge that has been inherited, not awarded.
A true Christian has his own badge, not somebody else's passed
down to him. There _is_ a difference. And a true Christian knows
the responsibility that goes along with being a 'follower of Christ'.
I think you can see this if you look at the different ways
"Christians" responded to the Nazi cause. What made some go along
with it and even support it, while others gave their lives to oppose
it? What made the difference? Do you suppose it just might have been
spiritual understanding that made the difference?
Irena
|