T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
778.1 | You got some of it... | MELTIN::dick | Schoeller | Thu Sep 21 1989 17:11 | 13 |
| Deb,
You are right that if the first-born child is a boy he must be redeemed from
Temple service. This is in commemoration of the slaying of the first born
among the Egyptians (Exodus 13:11-16) and the sparing of the first born
among the Jews. The redemption is done by paying a Kohane a small amount of
money and reciting certain formulas. Levites and (including Kohanes) are
excluded since they are, as a tribe, dedicated for Temple service.
Most likely the "big party" that your cousin had was for the Brit Millah
(circumcision) on the 8th day not for pidyon ha-ben.
Gavriel
|
778.2 | More | CLYPPR::WASSERMAN | Deb Wasserman, DTN 264-1863 | Thu Sep 21 1989 17:51 | 9 |
| So, Levites and Kohanes _can't_ be redeemed from Temple service ? They
have to remain dedicated to service?
Re: my cousin... Although this was about 15 years ago, I specifically
remember a small gathering at their house for the bris, and a large party
at the temple for the pidyon ha-ben. I guess they like to have parties :-)
Thanks.
|
778.3 | More Qualifiers | USACSB::SCHORR | | Thu Sep 21 1989 18:34 | 6 |
| The boy must be born of a normal birth. A child of a C-section
does not require a Pidyon Ha-Ben. Also if the mother had a prior
miscarriage if the fetus had lived a certain numbers of months
the boy is not considered the first born.
WS
|
778.4 | More info on qualifiers, please | TAVIS::JUAN | | Sun Sep 24 1989 05:38 | 10 |
| Re: .3
> The boy must be born of a normal birth. A child of a C-section
> does not require a Pidyon Ha-Ben.
Could you please be more specific? Could you quote some precedent?
Thanks,
Juan-Carlos Kiel
|
778.5 | More on C-sections | TAV02::SID | | Mon Sep 25 1989 04:07 | 20 |
| Re: .4
The specific Biblical injunction to redeem the first born specifies
"the first born of the womb" (kol peter rechem). Since a C-section
does not bring the baby out through the womb (I don't know if this
is technically medically correct, but it really doesn't matter), those
babies are not required to be redeemed. In addition, if there was
a previous miscarriage or abortion, subsequent babies don't have
a pidyon haben.
By the way, C-sections were not unknown in Talmudic times and the
Hebrew expression "yotze dofen" (meaning exceptional, but literally,
"coming out through the side") comes from this. Also by the way,
the term Ceasarian has nothing to do with Ceaser, but that's really
a topic for another conference.
Given all the requirements (male child, neither parent is of Cohen
or Levi descent, no C-section, no previous abortions) a pidyon haben
is really a relatively rare occurance.
|
778.6 | | TAVIS::JONATHAN | | Mon Sep 25 1989 08:06 | 21 |
| Re: .5
> Also by the way,
> the term Ceasarian has nothing to do with Ceaser, but that's really
> a topic for another conference.
Are you sure on this, Sid? I always thought that Julius got his surname
from the way he was born. (caedo, caedere, caesi, caesum is Latin for
to cut, as I remember from my high-school Latin of 30 years ago).
> Given all the requirements (male child, neither parent is of Cohen
> or Levi descent, no C-section, no previous abortions) a pidyon haben
> is really a relatively rare occurance.
Is it all that rare? Both I and my eldest son had one.
It really is a very nice ceremony without all the hassle of a brit.
BTW - we are learning about this very topic of pidyon haben these very days
in Daf Yomi of Bchorot ch. 8. (Daf Yomi, literally daily page, is the
same page of Gemara which is learnt daily by people the world over).
Jonathan Wreschner
|
778.7 | I come to bury this topic... | TAV02::SID | | Mon Sep 25 1989 15:24 | 18 |
| > Also by the way,
> the term Ceasarian has nothing to do with Ceaser, but that's really
> a topic for another conference.
>>Are you sure on this, Sid? I always thought that Julius got his surname
>>from the way he was born. (caedo, caedere, caesi, caesum is Latin for
>>to cut, as I remember from my high-school Latin of 30 years ago).
Glad you asked. Though the idea of Caeserian section has been known for
millenia, it's only very recently that it was possible for the mother
to survive the operation. In ancient times, the mother *always*
died in the process. Now there are several references to Julius's
mother being alive when he was an adult and ruled Rome, so he couldn't
have given his name to the operation. I suspect the etymology is
more closely related to the Latin for cut (as you wrote).
By the way, Caeser became synonymous for ruler. Isn't it interesting
that the Hebrew word for crown is "keter"?
|
778.8 | keter vs caesar | ULTRA::ELLIS | David Ellis | Tue Sep 26 1989 09:30 | 11 |
| Re .7:
> By the way, Caeser became synonymous for ruler. Isn't it interesting
> that the Hebrew word for crown is "keter"?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think there's no connection here.
"keter" begins with the Hebrew letter KAF, while the Hebrew cognate
for "caesar" begins with QOF and uses the letter SAMEKH for the "s" sound.
/ David /
|
778.9 | Try it you'll like it | BOSHOG::ENGEL | Daniel, time for bed now | Wed Sep 27 1989 14:40 | 18 |
| >> Given all the requirements (male child, neither parent is of Cohen
>> or Levi descent, no C-section, no previous abortions) a pidyon haben
>> is really a relatively rare occurance.
Re: .5
I'm not so sure about that. My father, my son and I all had one.
As for my father and myself, I don't remember so well, but the
Pidyon Ha-ben for my son was really nice. A friend of mine who
is a Cohen recited his part, we all had a laugh about whether I
should really buy the kid back, under pressure from my wife I paid,
and we celebrated.
Onw thing for sure - the child seems to enjoy the Pidyon more than
the Brit.
Steve Engel
|