T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
699.1 | Kosher cheese | CURIE::FEINBERG | Don Feinberg | Tue May 16 1989 11:06 | 27 |
| > How is Kosher cheese made?
Basically, the the process is the same as for non-kosher cheese.
The trickiest kashrut problem with cheese is the rennet. "Rennet"
is an enzyme which is used to coagulate the milk into cheese.
There are two classes: "hard" cheese, and "soft" cheese. Beware:
"hard" and "soft" have only little correlation with the texture of
the cheese; they have to do with whether enzymes are necessary to
coagulate the cheese.
"Soft" cheeses (example: cream cheese, pot cheese) do not require
the enzymes, and therefore have the same kashruth process that any
other "normal" dairy product would require.
In the production of "hard" cheeses, the rennet is used. Now,
rennet is normally made from the stomach lining of a cow. Hence
the kashrut problem. (Example of a "hard" cheese: cheddar)
However, there is available, to food processors, a rennet-like
enzyme which has a completely chemical basis -- and which functions
as rennet would in cheese production. If this enzyme is used
instead of "natural" rennet, and the ingredients/process are
certifiable from all other angles, the cheese is considered kosher.
don feinberg
|
699.2 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Tue May 16 1989 11:16 | 7 |
| To add to what Don said:
There's an artificial rennet that manufactured by genetically engineered
bacteria. I'm not sure if this is what's used by kosher cheese makers.
A more pointed question is, how was kosher cheese made before artificial
rennet was available? I don't know.
|
699.3 | | ULTRA::ELLIS | David Ellis | Tue May 16 1989 13:03 | 15 |
| I'm somewhat out of my depth of expertise here, but I don't believe the issue
in kashrut for cheese is _whether_ the rennet is of animal origin.
I think that the issue is whether rennet of animal origin comes from a kosher
animal. Accordingly, rennet from a properly slaughtered cow is OK, while
rennet from a pig is not.
The Rabbinical Assembly (Conservative movement) issued a ruling that
the rennet used in fixing cheese is no longer recognizable as to whether it
is animal in origin, much less which animal it is derived from. Hence, from
their point of view, any rennet used in fixing cheese is acceptable as far as
the kashrut of the cheese is concerned. Of course, the Orthodox movement
does not go along with this position.
If I'm mistaken, please post corrections as a followup reply to this note.
|
699.4 | What is the chemical | MTA::COMAROW | Subway Series in 89 | Tue May 16 1989 13:59 | 4 |
| I'm real interested if anyone can write anything more about what
chemical is used.
I'm sure that Kosher laws wouldn't allow cow rennet, period in dairy.
|
699.6 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Tue May 16 1989 16:14 | 19 |
| I'm a little more familiar with gelatin than with rennet. The
conservatives hold that gelatin made from pigs is kosher. That's
why Jello has a K on it -- there's some conservative rabbi who
approves of it.
There's a conservadox rabbi named Scheinkopf (sp?) who holds that
gelatin made from kosher species is kosher whether or not the
shechita (slaughter) was kosher. Until Kojel switched to some
vegetable substitute and got an OU, they had Scheinkopf's
approval. I saw some marshmallows for Pesach that also had his
approval, so he's not out of business.
The mainline orthodox opinion on gelatin is that it's kosher only
if the source is kosher. I don't know if it's considered meat.
BTW, the principal of Batel B'shishim (a substance is nullified
ex post facto if it's less that 1/60 of the total, e.g. if a drop
of milk falls into your pot of chicken soup, it's OK) doesn't apply
to the rennet in cheese, since you can't make cheese without it.
|
699.7 | Vegetable rennet | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Secure Systems for Insecure People | Tue May 16 1989 18:28 | 7 |
| There was cheese made with "vegetable rennet" at least ten years
ago. That predates genetic engineering, and I don't know what the
source of the rennet was, but cheese made with it was acceptable
to the vegetarians as well as the conservative members of our food
co-op.
--David
|
699.8 | Will the real "rennet" please stand up.... | TAVENG::CHAIM | A matzah ball a day..... | Wed May 17 1989 04:54 | 22 |
| It's been quite a while since I went over these laws (in Yore Dea),
but I believe that the origin of the substance being used is irrelevant
as to its kashruth (whether it was slaughtered correctly). The factor
which is important is whether or not the substance has been dried
out enough to the extent that it no longer can give out any flavor
or taste. If the substance has been dried out sufficiently, then
it may be used in the making of cheese, otherwise not.
Rabbi Chaim Ozer Grodinzki was known to have written several responsa
in which he allowed the use of commercially produced "rennet". Of
course the underlying reasoning was his belief that the "rennet" was
indeed being sufficiently dried out. When Rabbi Eliezer Silver came to
the U.S. he went and checked out how the "rennet" was being produced,
and he was NOT satisfied that the drying proces was sufficient. His son
told me that he subsequently wrote to Rabbi Chaim Ozer and the latter
modified his responsa.
I don't think that the O.U. relies on any real "rennet" and allows
only synthetic "rennet" in its products.
Cb.
|
699.9 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '89 | Wed May 31 1989 11:29 | 10 |
| My understanding was that part of the issue was whether or not rennet
was "suitable to be eaten by a dog" and if its origin was recognizable.
If one posits that the above is true of rennet than it doesn't matter
where the rennet comse from. If the above is not the case than even
if it comes from a cow it might be considered meat. Thus to be
completely safe its easier to use cheese where the rennet is synthetic.
yoseff
|
699.10 | | LABC::FRIEDMAN | | Wed May 31 1989 13:12 | 4 |
| Does God really care about all these technical issues? I think that
it's the idea, the attitude, that you make a good-faith effort to
keep kosher. You do it for the discipline, to show that we are
not "bloodthirsty." It's not like nonkosher food is poison.
|
699.11 | | CARTUN::FRYDMAN | wherever you go...you're there | Wed May 31 1989 13:57 | 6 |
| Actually... G-d does seem to care, since most of the dietary laws are
clearly stated in the Torah---e.g. kosher vs non-kosher animals. Of
course, one must believe that G-d was the author/inspiration for the
Torah.
Av
|
699.12 | rennet: more questions than answers | IOSG::LEVY | QA Bloodhound | Wed May 31 1989 15:02 | 33 |
| Hi,
I also heard that the rules of kashrut only apply if the substance
would be eaten by a dog. It is for this reason that washing powders do not
need to be certified as being kosher. Of course there are those who
will always demand that bit more! I remember wondering about the basis
of the original statement as I wasn't aware that dogs would eat all
food suitable for a human.
With respect to rennet and what makes it kosher /not kosher this is
an area that seems to be full of confusion and little understood.
The obvious question in my mind is that if rennet is considered
a substance of meat origin it would seem that the laws of kashrut
forbid it's mixture with milk (and hence cheese making). If it is
considered to be a milk substance then kashrut should apply the same
criteria to it's kashrut as other milk substances. By this I would
have thought that those who require their milk to be supervised should
expect the same from rennet and for that matter the milk that makes
cheese. Those who do not buy supervised milk should not need to buy
supervised cheese (unless the health laws that safeguard milk and its
origin don't apply to rennet).
If rennet is regarded as a chemical I fail to understand how it could
render cheese as kosher or not kosher (unless the question is when it
becomes a chemical, and the need for drying out for this to occur).
Regarding Chaim's note and the importance of the drying out process
I heard that there was a very dubious practice of allowing rennet
that comes from Cows in India as they are left to rot after dying.
This would confirm Chaim's statement as the cows are not kosher but the
rennet would have had the opportunity to dry out.
/Malcolm
|
699.13 | Learning all the time! | ANT::PKANDAPPAN | | Fri Jun 02 1989 11:21 | 8 |
| Re: < Note 699.12 by IOSG::LEVY "QA Bloodhound" >
> that comes from Cows in India as they are left to rot after dying.
Very interesting indeed. The next time I go home, I'll look around for cows
that are dead and rotting.....
-parthi
|