T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
569.1 | the religious parties | TAVIS::SID | | Wed Oct 26 1988 12:16 | 28 |
| Well, Zaitch, you're missing all the fun...
Yes, I would say that Amital's moderate religious party, Meimad,
is generating interest, but how much depends on whom you ask. The
National Religious Party (Mafdal) has said several times in their
TV ads "Don't waste your vote on Meimad; they won't pass the ahuz
hahasima (the minimum 1% required to get a seat)". Of course it's
in the NRP's interest to scare people away from Meimad. On the other
hand I recently attended a chug bayit (parlor meeting) in which the
Meimad representative said that according to their polls they already
have 3 seats and are working on the 4th. Of course he wasn't objective
either.
I think the truth is in the middle and that Meimad will probably get one,
possibly two, seats.
As for the other parties, Agudat Yisrael and Poalei Agudat Yisrael have
joined together with the support of the Lubavitcher Rebbe, who promises
a blessing to whoever votes for them. Their flyers have a coupon in
which you promise to vote Aguda, you mail it to the rebbe, and he gives
you a blessing. On the other hand, former Sephardic Chief Rabbi Ovadia
Yosef has declared a public "hatarat nedarim", nullifying such promises
anyone may have made, if only they will vote for his party, Shas. If
it weren't so sad, it would certainly be funny.
Someone once said that the Jews are like everyone else, only more so.
I think the same could be said about the relgious parties relative to
the other parties.
|
569.2 | how about some info? | TAZRAT::CHERSON | Zippy & Leona in '88! | Wed Oct 26 1988 12:46 | 6 |
| re: .0 & .1
I'm not that familiar with Rabbi Amital and Meimad. Could someone
please post a description of their ideology, platform, etc.?
David
|
569.3 | I hope I'm still alive in 5789 | HAMAN::GROSS | Wanted: inane comment to fill this slot | Wed Oct 26 1988 13:13 | 4 |
| How about upping the minimum vote requirement to 1.67% (1/60). This proposal
"should" appeal to the religious parties. And isn't the year 5749?
Dave
|
569.4 | RATZ party? | ULTRA::ELLIS | David Ellis | Thu Oct 27 1988 09:11 | 5 |
| Yes, the year is 5749, not 5789. (moderator: please change the topic title).
Does anybody know about the RATZ party? What is their position? Are they
expected to win any seats in the Knesset?
|
569.5 | oops | VAXWRK::ZAITCHIK | Existence is NOT a predicate | Thu Oct 27 1988 16:19 | 9 |
| re .3:
>How about upping the minimum vote requirement to 1.67% (1/60). This proposal
>"should" appeal to the religious parties.
actually it should be set at 16.66% (1/6)
... since that would mean any party getting less is getting "pachot
mishtut". I would spell "shtut" with a tet-taf, not a taf-taf !
>And isn't the year 5749?
Yes, that was a typo.
-ZAITCH
|
569.6 | Election Results???? | HOMBAS::WAKY | | Tue Nov 01 1988 08:36 | 7 |
| Can someone from Tavland give us some election results when you
know them??? I figure the NET is faster than the eve news, especially
with the time difference.
Thanks,
Waky
|
569.7 | from your reporter at the scene | TAVENG::GOLDMAN | | Tue Nov 01 1988 16:10 | 16 |
| The initial FORECAST was given less than hour ago.
The Likud and Ma'arach (Labor) are tied with 40 mandates each.
The religious parties seemed to have gained some strength with
about 15 mandates. The rest is spread around among the various
smaller parties.
Interviews are being held with big-wigs of the two major parties
and each claim that they will be the one put together the next
government.
It looks like there's going to be a lot of political horse
trading in order to set up a coalition.
The bottom line is that the Israeli people are more or less split
down the middle and we don't know what the hell we want!!!!!
|
569.8 | what it's worth | TAVIS::SID | | Tue Nov 01 1988 17:55 | 21 |
| Boy, you are fast, Aharon!
I'd like to point out for the benefit of our cousins in galut
that this forecast is based on a different method from the
one used when the American networks make their projections
(I think).
The forecast is based on a system of mock voting booths set up
outside supposedly representative polling areas. Voters are asked
to reproduce the vote they performed inside the poll (the booth is
also set up to look like the real thing). These polls are counted
as the day progresses so that the results are available immediately
and are announced by Israel TV immediately after the polls close at
10:00 (our time).
These forecasts have been astonishingly accurate in the past
three elections, but still are not the final word. We won't
have more definitive results till tomorrow morning.
By the way, Meimad (discussed preciously in this note) did not
receive the minimum required to have a seat in the Knesset
accoding to the forecast.
|
569.9 | DETAILS, DETAILS... | VAXWRK::ZAITCHIK | Existence is SOMETIMES a Predicate | Tue Nov 01 1988 22:29 | 6 |
| COULD SOMEONE OUT THERE GIVE A BREAKDOWN PARTY BY PARTY?
ESPECIALLY HOW THE DIFFERENT (SO-CALLED) RELIGIOUS PARTIES
FARED?
TOO BAD ABOUT MEIMAD... (AT LEAST IF THEY ENDED UP STANDING FOR
WHAT THEY SET OUT TO STAND FOR...)
-ZAITCH
|
569.10 | results from Wednesday's 7 AM news | ERICG::ERICG | Eric Goldstein | Wed Nov 02 1988 01:16 | 19 |
| I hadn't had my first cup of coffee when I heard these, so I may have gotten
some wrong. Also, there still is the possibility of a change in a seat
or two.
Likud 39
Labor Alignment 38
Shas 6
National Religious Party 5
Agudat Yisrael 5
Citizens Rights Movement (Ratz) 5
Hadash (Communists) 5
Techiya 3
Mapam 3
Degel Hatorah 2
Progressive List for Peace 2
Tzomet 2
Moledet 2
Shinui 2
Abdel Darousha 1
|
569.11 | untitled | TAZRAT::CHERSON | Zippy & Leona in '88! | Wed Nov 02 1988 08:16 | 5 |
| Hmm, I must be behind the times, I didn't know that Mapam had dropped
out of the maarach. No one has yet explained what the ideology
of Meimad was, I'm really curious.
David
|
569.12 | degel hatorah? | VAXWRK::ZAITCHIK | Existence is SOMETIMES a Predicate | Wed Nov 02 1988 11:12 | 4 |
| ...and while you're at it, what is
>> Degel Hatorah 2
?
-ZAITCH
|
569.13 | The Torah Flag? | GRECO::FRYDMAN | wherever you go...you're there | Wed Nov 02 1988 11:26 | 3 |
| Isn't Degel Torah the Rav Shach "breakaway minyon"?
Av
|
569.14 | Meimad & Degel | TAVENG::GOLDMAN | | Wed Nov 02 1988 13:43 | 9 |
| Meimad is (was?) a center-to-left leaning religious party, mostly
break-away from the NRP (Mafdal, National Religious Party). Their
main points are to bridge the gap between religious and non-religous
and they are willing to return territory in order to preserve life
and peace.
Degel Hatora is a break-away from Aguda. These are both
ultra-orthodox parties and the break came at the behest of Rav
Shach from B'nei Brak.
|
569.15 | something positive + | MAMIE::SAADEH | Will there ever be peace over there | Wed Nov 02 1988 16:09 | 16 |
| < Note 569.14 by TAVENG::GOLDMAN >
< Meimad is (was?) a center-to-left leaning religious party, mostly
< break-away from the NRP (Mafdal, National Religious Party). Their
< main points are to bridge the gap between religious and non-religous
< and they are willing to return territory in order to preserve life
< and peace.
I'm all for this point and hope that this will be a start to long
lasting peace.
-Sultan
P.S.
I have a dream to visit my birth place after 20 years
away from home. Maybe this can become reality.
|
569.16 | I hope you can visit it. | GRECO::FRYDMAN | wherever you go...you're there | Wed Nov 02 1988 16:48 | 6 |
| Sultan,
Where is your birth place...and what is preventing you from visiting
it?
Av
|
569.17 | some day. | MAMIE::SAADEH | Will there ever be peace over there | Thu Nov 03 1988 09:07 | 11 |
|
I am from Rammallah. A city in the West Bank,Phalestine.
Other than getting a good work out by the SLS (steroid loaded soldier)
of Israel Government there is no other reason for not going.
Actually, physically there is nothing to prevent me from going. But
I would like to feel that I can visit without being attacked for
no reason.
-Sultan
|
569.18 | no such thing | TAZRAT::CHERSON | Zippy & Leona in '88! | Thu Nov 03 1988 11:04 | 9 |
| re: -1
Sultan, I don't that by just the fact of your being in Ramallah
will give the army reason to fire on you. However if you were to
take part in a demonstration, well that may be another story.
By the way Israeli soldiers are not "loaded on steroids".
David
|
569.19 | final election results, and coalition speculation | ERICG::ERICG | Eric Goldstein | Fri Nov 04 1988 06:28 | 26 |
| Following are the final results, as announced today (Friday).
Likud 40
Labor Alignment 39
Shas 6
National Religious Party 5
Agudat Yisrael 5
Citizens Rights Movement (Ratz) 5
Hadash (Communists) 4
Techiya 3
Mapam 3
Degel Hatorah 2
Tzomet 2
Moledet 2
Shinui 2
Progressive List for Peace 1
Abdel Darousha 1
Since the preliminary results in .10, Likud and the Alignment each have
gained a seat, and Hadash and the PLP each have lost one.
It now appears most likely that the next government will be made up of all,
or almost all, of the right-wing and religious parties. These have a total
of 65 seats, out of 120, in the incoming Knesset. There are a few "minor
details" to be worked out, such as major incompatibilities in their election
platforms and ideologies, so such a coalition might not include all of them.
|
569.20 | I don't hear the fat lady yet | ULTRA::ELLIS | David Ellis | Mon Nov 07 1988 11:20 | 10 |
| Re: .19:
> It now appears most likely that the next government will be made up of
> all, or almost all, of the right-wing and religious parties.
According to today's Boston Globe, negotiations between Likud and the
religious parties have ground to a standstill, and some representatives of
the religious parties are stating that they'd rather align with Labor.
It seems to me that there's still some distance to go before a working
coalition can be set up.
|
569.21 | Mi Yehudi? | TAZRAT::CHERSON | Zippy & Leona in '88! | Mon Nov 07 1988 13:34 | 7 |
| re: .20
I'd be willing to (well almost) bet this week's check that the sticking
point of negotiations is over "Mi yehudi" (who is a Jew?). But
if this is the case than they couldn't expect much more from Labor.
David
|