| Title: | BAGELS and other things of Jewish interest |
| Notice: | 1.0 policy, 280.0 directory, 32.0 registration |
| Moderator: | SMURF::FENSTER |
| Created: | Mon Feb 03 1986 |
| Last Modified: | Thu Jun 05 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 1524 |
| Total number of notes: | 18709 |
This was posted to the Usenet soc.culture.jewish newsgroup. You might
find it interesting.
Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish
Path: decwrl!decvax!mcnc!gatech!hao!oddjob!gargoyle!ihnp4!occrsh!erc3ba!alu
Subject: D'var Torah: Sh'mot: Rabbi Riskin
Posted: 8 Jan 88 14:25:01 GMT
Organization: AT&T Engineering Research Center
SHABBAT SHALOM: Shmot -- The Pharaohs of Russia
by Shlomo Riskin
EFRAT, Israel -- Some twenty years ago, the plight of Soviet
Jewry was just beginning to echo across the cities of America
with large Jewish populations, and the Soviet Government, in
trying to quell the rumors which yoked the status of the Jews in
modern Russia to the status of the Jews in ancient Egypt, sent
the Chief Rabbi of Moscow to New York. I very much wanted to meet
with Rabbi Levin. In the hotel where he was staying, the Essex
House in N.Y. a minyan gathered every morning, which I joined.
Lincoln Square was located within walking distance of the hotel,
and at some point I was introduced to Rabbi Levin as the
neighborhood rabbi. Although I was quite young at the time, he
greeted me warmly, and invited me to have breakfast with him the
following morning, a Friday.
I was terribly anxious to learn about Jewish life in Russia.
Could one find kosher food in Moscow? Were there synagogues with
active membership in Russia? Were there yeshivas? Did people
learn Torah and study Talmud? And Rabbi Levin, instead of
answering directly, repeated my questions. Could one find kosher
food in America? Were there synagogues with active membership in
New York? Were there yeshivas in America?
Joining us for breakfast was a man dressed like a typically
religious Jew, and at the time I figured he was Rabbi Levin's
assistant, but I soon found out otherwise. When he got up to go
to the men's room, Rabbi Levin suddenly said to me that we should
see sing a zemiril, and the song he chose came from the Friday
night zemirot. When he got to the words, "Prok yat anach mipum
aryavata...." (Take your sheep out of the mouth of the lion, and
remove your nation from the midst of the exile), he sang that
line repeatedly, tears streaming down his face.
When the man returned from the men's room, Rabbi Levin
composed himself but not before he was asked why he was singing
zemirot when it wasn't the Sabbath. Without batting an eyelash,
Rabbi Levin answered that the young rabbi wanted to know how they
sang this particular song in Slobodka, the well know Talmudic
academy where Rabbi Levin had once been a student.
Nothing could have spoken louder than those tears. I had my
answer. Russia was a land that swallowed its lambs.
Not long afterwards I went to Russia to see the lion with my
own eyes. There I discovered that the new edition of prayer books
which Rabbi Levin had brought along as an example of the Soviet
Union's liberalizing policy toward Judaism was, in fact, a sham.
The prayer books were kept behind locked doors in the synagogue,
available only to tourists.
My journey took me to Leningrad where I sought out the chief
rabbi of the city. A man no longer young, he'd also suffered
under the Communists, having spent time locked in jail. He
apologized quietly under his breath for not inviting me to a
Shabbat meal at his home; it was impossible to do so.
While still in New York, I'd been asked to deliver a photo
of the chief rabbi's daughter, her husband and grandchild.
Somehow she had gotten out of Russia and lived in Israel. The
first chance I felt it was safe, I whispered to Rabbi Lubanov in
Yiddish, "Ich hub a bild foon aier tochter."
His face turned white. And then he asked me to drop the
photo to the ground as inconspicuously as possible. While he kept
the photo hidden with his shoe, he asked me the following
question: In Tractate Moed Katan (26a) of the Talmud, it says
that if one is present where a Torah scroll is destroyed, Heaven
forbid, then one must rend his garment twice --once for the
actual Torah, the parchment, and once for the holy letters.
However, he continued, in Tractate Avoda Zara (18a) the text
tells us that during the Hadriatic persecutions when Rabbi
Chanina ben Tradyon was burned at the stake wrapped in a Torah
scroll, his students cried out, "Master, what you do you see?"
And he answered that despite the actual scroll burning and
turning to ash, the holy black letters were flying up to heaven.
Rabbi Lubanov, in a hurried voice, continued. If Rabbi
Chanina saw the letters flying up --meaning that they could never
be destroyed-- why did the Talmud in Moed Katan tell us to mourn
for the letters separately. He grabbed my hand and said that it
all depends on who is destroying the Torah. If only the enemy is
destroying it, then the letters can never be destroyed. But if
the Jew is collaborating with the enemy, then not only is the
parchment destroyed, but the letters are destroyed as well.
I never saw him again, but I never forgot what he said.
Historically, the leaders of Jewish communities have found
it extremely difficult to ignore an enemy's tantalizing promise
that collaboration will, in the long run, mean more lives and
institutions saved. The culmination of this approach was reached
in WW2 when the Judenrat worked with the Germans, acting as a
liaison between the Nazi war machine and millions of Jews in
their towns and cities. They meant well. Under threats of
wholesale murders, one of their jobs was to supply lists of
names, far fewer in number than the Nazis swore they'd kill.
In this week's Torah portion we read of Pharaoh's
destructive edict ordering Shifra and Puah, the chief Hebrew
midwives, to ensure that all male children would be thrown into
the Nile while only females were allowed to live. What we don't
see in the text, although it could easily have been part of
Pharaoh's message, was that if the midwives didn't listen to him,
then both males and females would be killed.
Had Shifra and Puah been members of the Judenrat, they might
have listened to Pharaoh, but the Torah tells us that that
"...the midwives feared G-d and didn't do as the King of Egypt
commanded." [Genesis 1:17] Looking at the arc of recorded
history, from Pharaoh to Hitler, we see that it's impossible to
successfully execute genocide unless there is help from the
inside, and when Shifra and Puah don't listen to Pharaoh (Rashi
identifies them as the mother and sister of Moses, Yocheved and
Miriam) they set a standard for the correct behavior with the
enemy. Unfortunately, not everyone has been able to live up to
the standards of Shifra and Puah, but today, in modern Russia,
we're witnessing something incredible. What is unique about the
new refuseniks is that they refuse to collaborate with the
Russian powers on any level.
In one sense, Pharaoh telling the midwives to save the
females while killing the males might be compared to a government
saying we'll save your bodies but kill your souls --which has
been the predicament of Jews in 20th century Russia. And just as
Shifra and Puah saved the life of Moses, maybe the next Moses
will be born in Russia, saved from certain spiritual death
because of the refuseniks Shifra and Puah and Ida who stood up
again and again and again to defy the Russian Pharaohs.
Shabbat Shalom
Copyright Ohr Torah 1987.
This essay is distributed by Kesher --the Jewish Network. For information
regarding its use, contact the Kesher BBS at 312- 940-1686
For more information, call (212)496-1618.
--
Alan Lustiger
|_ | | AT&T Engineering Research Center
/ |( Princeton, NJ
{AT&T Machines}!pruxc!alu
========================================================================
Received: by decwrl.dec.com (5.54.4/4.7.34)
id AA07087; Sat, 9 Jan 88 15:11:55 PST
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 424.1 | Some universal applications | BRAT::PULKSTENIS | Lost and Found | Mon Jan 18 1988 13:04 | 154 |
I wanted to share with you the following response which appeared in
the Christian conference. The writer draws some interesting parallels
for both Christians and Jews who have the freedom to practice their
religion according to their faith but find themselves taking that freedom
for granted. Perhaps you, too, will see the parallels.
Irena
-------------------------------------------------------------
<<< IOSG::LIB0:[NOTES$LIBRARY]CHRISTIAN.NOTE;1 >>>
-< The New Christian Notes Conference >-
================================================================================
Note 361.1 INTERESTING NOTE FROM BAGELS 1 of 1
HYDRA::CHICOINE 148 lines 15-JAN-1988 13:52
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I found this note hauntingly poignant to both modern day Christians
and Jews, in America. The connection is not so clear so as to say that
the oppression of Religion in the Soviet Union is the same in America,
but I do believe that as far as True religious conviction is concerned,
the results of life in America and Russia, are no less detrimental to
both religions.
In Russia the oppressor is obvious and tangible. It is easy to know
who and what your enemy is. Religious conviction is a serious matter and
is never entered into lightly. When practicing your belief can cost you
your life, you take time to asses the value of that conviction to your-
self. And like a precious possession, you guard it from deterioration
and devaluation. You keep it from thieves and swindlers, and protect
it with your life.
When Rabbi Levin sang the phrase "take your sheep out of the mouth
of the Lion, and remove your nation from the midst of exile", it became
clear to me, that, must be our song also. More than a song, a fervent
prayer! GOD. Take your sheep out of the mouth of the lion.
Here in America (Christians and Jews) are free to worship as they
choose. There is no religious persecution so strong so as to stop any
of us from attending a worship service, reading our Scripture, or even
preaching our beliefs to whom-ever will listen. So what's my problem?
My concern began to come into focus with the reading of this next
paragraph of the text.
> Rabbi Lubanov, in a hurried voice, continued. If Rabbi
> Chanina saw the letters flying up --meaning that they could never
> be destroyed-- why did the Talmud in Moed Katan tell us to mourn
> for the letters separately.
>>> He grabbed my hand and said that it
>>> all depends on who is destroying the Torah. If only the enemy is
>>> destroying it, then the letters can never be destroyed. But if
>>> the Jew is collaborating with the enemy, then not only is the
>>> parchment destroyed, but the letters are destroyed as well.
This was it! The enemy in America is within, and as Rabbi Lubanov
said, this is the only thing that can destroy God's word. We don't have
a military or governmental oppressor, but you had better believe we have
oppressors within our lives that are just as detrimental to living out our
faith.
Now when I read:
> I was terribly anxious to learn about Jewish life in Russia.
> Could one find kosher food in Moscow? Were there synagogues with
> active membership in Russia? Were there yeshivas? Did people
> learn Torah and study Talmud? And Rabbi Levin, instead of
> answering directly, repeated my questions. Could one find kosher
> food in America? Were there synagogues with active membership in
> New York? Were there yeshivas in America?
The questions repeated by Rabbi Levin have the same relevance here in
America as they do in Russia, But not for the same reasons. There, people
have a government that stops them from living in the full commitment of
their faith, here, it is our comfortable life-styles, and our assimilation
into society that has been the demise of strong religious convictions. The
result is the same.
> Nothing could have spoken louder than those tears. I had my
> answer. Russia was a land that swallowed its lambs.
> Not long afterwards I went to Russia to see the lion with my
> own eyes. There I discovered that the new edition of prayer books
> which Rabbi Levin had brought along as an example of the Soviet
> Union's liberalizing policy toward Judaism was, in fact, a sham.
> The prayer books were kept behind locked doors in the synagogue,
> available only to tourists.
I doubt that God looks down upon the religiously oppressed in Russia
with as discontented an eye as He does upon those that have religious
freedom, and neglect to earnestly seek His face. I suspect that to God the
prayer books kept behind locked doors cause less grief than the ones lost
in someone's private library collecting dust, or the ones used to cast
God's words upon hardened hearts and deaf ears. And that the sham set up
for outward display to pacify tourists, is no more degrading than the out-
ward display of religiosity set up in our hearts only to pacify God Himself.
> Historically, the leaders of Jewish communities have found
> it extremely difficult to ignore an enemy's tantalizing promise
> that collaboration will, in the long run, mean more lives and
> institutions saved.
Hard as it might be to accept, this is still true today. We find
it extremely difficult to ignore an enemy's tantalizing promise that
collaboration will in the long run, mean more lives and institutions
saved. So we see our religions flexing and conforming to the world's
ever decreasing moral standards. In an effort not to stand out or to
be ostracized by society, our theological leaders slowly allow the Word
of God to be destroyed. We see individuals walking away from "extreme"
philosophies, and embracing liberalism. Participation in, and interest
in long established matters of religious conviction are scoffed at and
philosophically relegated out of our lives. In Christianity we see such
things daily devotions, fasting, tithing, attendance of mid-week services,
or religious holiday services, fading out of the picture. Our children
have very few differences in life styles and attitudes, interests and
dress than any other "nice" child with no religious background. Discipline
is a dirty word, and conviction is out dated.
> Had Shifra and Puah been members of the Judenrat, they might
> have listened to Pharaoh, but the Torah tells us that that
> "...the midwives feared G-d and didn't do as the King of Egypt
> commanded." [Genesis 1:17]
Is it God we fear? Or is it self sacrifice? Are we looking for God's
blessing or the blessing of men? Do we dare to follow the word of God as
the HOLY SPIRIT leads or will we adopt a new way, that which has been
deliberated over and contrived by men to conform in a man made religion.
Are we storing up riches in heaven, or seeking after our reward here on
earth. Are wealth, leasuer, and pleasure the gods of today?
> Looking at the arc of recorded
> history, from Pharaoh to Hitler, we see that it's impossible to
> successfully execute genocide unless there is help from the
> inside,
AMEN!!!!
> and when Shifra and Puah don't listen to Pharaoh (Rashi
> identifies them as the mother and sister of Moses, Yocheved and
> Miriam) they set a standard for the correct behavior with the
> enemy. Unfortunately, not everyone has been able to live up to
> the standards of Shifra and Puah, but today, in modern Russia,
> we're witnessing something incredible. What is unique about the
> new refuseniks is that they refuse to collaborate with the
> Russian powers on any level.
These people are the hope of the world, that God will once again
move His hand and stop the moral decline and persecution of His people.
I feel a calling to God's people to seize the time while we still can
and to consecrate the Holy nation. A time for the remnant to arise.
*** May God Bless ***
John Chicoine
| |||||