T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
417.1 | The more the merrier | USACSB::SCHORR | | Mon Dec 21 1987 14:32 | 12 |
| I for one don't see any harm in what they are doing.
Since the Supreme Court decision allowes Creche scenes on public
property let them put up their menorahs.
I would rather have nothing as I belive that government should
not support any religion (where have I head that before) but since
they are going to have one then let them have a second. It reminds
the majority that there are others besides Christians in the world.
Also there is a growing sentiment that Christmas tress aren't a
religious symbol anymore.
|
417.2 | What would a Christmas tree be without Christmas | SAGE::PERLMAN | Eli B. Perlman | Mon Dec 21 1987 16:45 | 9 |
| Christmas Trees had significance (pagan) as religious symbols to the
Druids. The Church Christianized them as a way to attract more people
into the fold. To say that there is no religious significance is
not correct. To say it is not regognized as having religious
significance during this season of the year is also not correct.
To say that some people do not give the tree its proper regognition
as a religious symbol of Christmas is also true.
|
417.3 | Cultists? | MISFIT::EPSTEINJ | | Wed Dec 23 1987 08:54 | 11 |
|
I do not agree with the placing of channukiahs in public places.
I do not agree with the Lubavitch theology. I do not agree
with lots of other aspects of their way of life.
Most of all, I do not believe the members of the Lubavitch
movement should be referred to as "cultists". They are a valid
segment of Judaism and I think they have as much right to their
way of life as any other Jew.
--Julian
|
417.4 | they _might_ qualify as "cult" | AIM::GOLDSTEIN | Baba ROM DOS | Wed Dec 23 1987 11:14 | 10 |
| re:.3
> Most of all, I do not believe the members of the Lubavitch
> movement should be referred to as "cultists".
I don't know if Chabad is a cult or not, but the best definition
I've seen of "cult" is, roughly, "a religion whose membership is
primarily made of converts". Lubavich is known to actively solicit
"converts" from the Jewish community at large, so if they're very
successful, they're technically able to be called a cult. I doubt
that the numbers would bear out, but you never know...
|
417.5 | Trees | MAY20::MINOW | Je suis marxiste, tendance Groucho | Wed Dec 23 1987 11:45 | 10 |
| It's not so much that the Christian Church incorporated the tree into
its theology but rather that the Northern Europeans kept up their
traditions whether the church approved or not.
During mid-summer, for example, the Scandinavians dance around may-poles
which are, in some parts of Sweden/Finland about as obvious a phallic
symbol as you could ever ask for. Somehow, these have never been
incorporated into the local theology.
Martin.
|
417.6 | there are many cults | GRECO::FRYDMAN | wherever you go...you're there | Wed Dec 23 1987 12:06 | 14 |
| My American Heritage Dictionary defines "cult" as :
- a system or community of religious worship;
- obsessive devotion to a person or ideal.
When the words "cult" or "cultists" are used nowadays, they almost
always have a negative spin to them. (I didn't see a " :^) " in the
original note.)
According to this definition---maybe those who are devoted to the
ideal of "separation of church and state" ...:^).
|
417.7 | Education | CURIE::GERBERG | | Wed Dec 23 1987 13:30 | 16 |
|
As stated in the first note, if the mainstream Jewish Community
are the people who are objecting to the placement of Hannuka Menorahs on
public property, I question whether they are objecting out of personal
embarrassment? If you don't believe in the Lubbavitch theology but
identify as a Jew, you should recognize the Menorah as a Jewish
symbol. Placing them in public places, as Nativity scenes are, only
reminds gentiles to not be so self-absorbed at this time of year.
Though, it also stands to remind those so inclined of their prejudice,
it is also one way we can educate gentiles of our beliefs and
traditions. Education is the only way to help eradicate prejudice.
|
417.8 | publicize the miracle! | CURIE::FEINBERG | Don Feinberg | Wed Dec 23 1987 14:26 | 44 |
| >> How does one deal with these cultists who ,in their misplaced zeal,
>> can cause so much harm ?
SO MUCH HARM?
Never mind the "cult" label, which is just silly. If you
have criticism to make about the Lubavitchers (and I'm not one...),
please _make_ it. Skip the emotionalism.
Now, "harm"...
I've been involved in two such incidents -- one in Nashua, and
the latest one in Lowell (where I live now).
Last year, a friend and I built and erected, with the City of Lowell's
permission and endorsement, a 13 foot diameter menorah on the
City Hall Plaza. (BTW, it was erected only during Chanukah, not
during the whole "holiday season".) A picture made the front page
of the Lowell Sun the next day, along with a rather nice little
article on Chanukah.
This year, a group from the Conservative Temple in Lowell found
a way to effectively block our putting the menorah up again.
Their reason was that "we were subverting their efforts to
achieve real separation of Church and state".
Well, yes. I'd prefer that there were NEITHER menorah nor cr�che
on public property. But (and it's a big "but"): The reality is
that the cr�che will continue to be there - every year. I have
a point to make: (in our case), Lowell is a pluralistic city.
Not Christian only, but Jewish, Islamic, Buddhist, Confucian, and
several other groups. If we have to live with the fact of the
cr�che, then the least that can be done is to point this out
in a peaceful and educational, "cross cultural" way.
This is to say nothing of the fact that you have a Mitzvah -- you
are obliged -- to "publicize the miracle". This is a great
opportunity to fulfill that Mitzvah.
Now, please tell me about the HARM. Who was harmed? The Jewish
community? The non-Jewish community? Is it B'nai B'rith's "Church
and state" effort you're talking about? Who?
/don feinberg
|
417.9 | Just another holiday symbol? | DELNI::GOLDBERG | | Wed Dec 23 1987 15:09 | 8 |
| re: .8
Do you think that you have, in the minds of most of the citizenry
of Lowell, contributed the menorah as just another symbol of the
general holiday season? Do you think it possible that the menorah,
among these other symbols, is absorbed and included in them? What
is the possibility that, if it hasn't already happened, that future
exposure of the menorah in a Christmas environment causes it to
lose its unique distinction?
|
417.10 | Don't have to look very far... | DIEHRD::MAHLER | Mordecai ben Moshe | Mon Jan 04 1988 14:25 | 5 |
|
Ever been to Newton Square in Worcester? Every year the local
Orthodox Schul puts up a natural gas "powered" menorah in the
rotary and I think it looks pretty nice there.
|