[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference tallis::celt

Title:Celt Notefile
Moderator:TALLIS::DARCY
Created:Wed Feb 19 1986
Last Modified:Tue Jun 03 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1632
Total number of notes:20523

1551.0. "Apportioning blame" by CBHVAX::CBH (Be kind to Andrea 'coz she's daft) Tue Feb 13 1996 11:53

One thing that I'm curious, and saddened, about in the wake of last friday's 
bomb, is the apportioning of the blame.  In some cases, this may be seen as a 
good thing, as it tends to force things into rather sharp relief in that we 
can see exactly where everyone stands.  Some people have chosen to blame the 
British Government, which I disagree with, but they're entitled to their 
opinions; perhaps they're misinformed, or perhaps they have a valid point to 
share.  Whatever.

What really concerns me is that some people have chosen to state that the 
British *people* bear the responsibility for this latest act of violence (I'm 
not saying that anyone in here has said as much, but I have heard it 
elsewhere)  This, I can't understand.  I mean, would they say to a rape 
victim, `well you were asking for it for being in the wrong place at the wrong 
time.'  I don't think so, somehow, so how they can expect to be taken 
seriously for blaming the British people for their own loss is completely 
beyond me.  Perhaps they are being serious because they have such a vehement 
hatred of people just because of where they were born, or perhaps they just 
get a kick out of their fifteen minutes of infamy.  I'd like to know so that I 
know where *I* stand in the view of such people.  Any comments?

Chris.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1551.1CBHVAX::CBHBe kind to Andrea 'coz she's daftTue Feb 13 1996 12:026
Re my basenote,

the analogy I'd meant to use, which had slipped my mind, was "...because she 
was asking for it".  Sorry, etc.

Chris.
1551.2CHEFS::COOPERT1Jamie badman -> Coke drinkerTue Feb 13 1996 12:0811
    .0
    
    I totally agree with that Chris, and I have heard that within this
    conference.
    
    .1
    
    No, you were right in the first place.
    
    
    CHARLEY
1551.3my tuppence worthTAGART::EDDIEEasy doesn't do itTue Feb 13 1996 12:2932
Chris,

Re.0

The IRA is to blame for planting that bomb. (That's the simple part 
answered).

The stalling of the peace process is the reason cited by the IRA for the 
planting of the bomb.

John Major and the British Government are to blame for stalling the peace
process. They set up an independent commission to make recommendations and
then threw out those recommendations.

I would not like to argue the culpability of the British public since this
Government doesn't seem to care what the electorate think anyway. We all 
know the power of the propaganda machine. We need only look to the Gulf War
and The Falklands Conflict to see how public opinion can be swayed by the 
media. The general public in Britain only see NI issues when bombs explode
in their streets. Most people are unaware of far less understand the deep
rooted hatred and mistrust which permeates NI. The source of most people's
information on NI is the news and the popular press so all they see is
bombs exploding and innocent civilians being killed. They then equate this
to the IRA and they develop a justifiably negative opinion. Most British 
children don't learn about anglo-irish history in schools since it shows 
their mother country in a bad light. The victor writes the history books
(that's when terrorists become freedom fighters). It is, therefore, very 
difficult to blame the British public for the break down of the peace 
process since they are not shown the bigger picture. Politicians, however,
should be far more aware of the facts and it behoves them to seek a 
peaceful settlement at any and every opportunity.
    
1551.4IRNBRU::HOWARDLovely Day for a GuinnessTue Feb 13 1996 12:3120
    Chris,                 
    
    I can't say that I've heard anyone blaming the British people for
    anything of this nature in this conference or anywhere else. I certainly 
    don't. Of course the Irish slag the English and vice-versa but that's as 
    far as it goes as far as I'm concerned. There are English/British-bashers 
    out there just as surely as there are Irish/Scots/Welsh/wherever-bashers 
    but even they surely don't blame the victims of an IRA bomb just for being 
    there. 
    
    If these people who you're talking about do exist then they are indeed 
    some sad individuals. Unfortunately they aren't going to change their 
    views either. Such racist thinking would usually be drilled into them 
    during childhood and would allow for no other points of view to be 
    considered....
     
    For this reason I'd give their views the respect they deserve,(none), 
    and get on with my life....
    
    Ray....
1551.5CBHVAX::CBHBe kind to Andrea 'coz she's daftTue Feb 13 1996 12:4121
Thanks for that reply, Eddie!  I think we'll have to agree to disagree on the 
role that the British government plays here (at least for now, anyway), I 
think that's being debated elsewhere...

I think you have a valid point about the way that people are educated as to 
the situation.  Many people either don't know too much about the history of 
what's been going on, or aren't interested in finding out, and I think this 
should really be addressed in terms of what is taught at school.  I think that 
Anglo-Irish history, and other aspects of the history of the British Isles, is 
more useful and more important than, say, Roman or Greek history which seems 
to be taught be default.  I know that now is the time to look forward rather 
than get trapped in the past, but a sound knowledge of past events would be 
beneficial, IMO.  Although I reckon I know more about the history than some 
other people I know, it's really just scratching the surface.

As to the media, well, as far as I'm concerned, the tabloid press is, as 
ever, beneath contempt.  All they're interested in is sensationalisation of 
the facts in a cynical attempt to boost sales, and what they have to report is 
of little value after being tainted by their editor's or sponsor's opinion.

Chris.
1551.6CBHVAX::CBHBe kind to Andrea 'coz she's daftTue Feb 13 1996 12:4515
Re: Ray,

some of the views I mentioned were expressed on the Usenet.  Okay, I know, I 
should take what's said there with a pinch of salt (more like a sackful!), but 
you never know when someone's being serious or if they're just out there 
making ludicrous comments to get attention.  If you haven't already looked, 
there're some interesting discussions going on in:

	soc.culture.british
and	soc.culture.irish

Chris.

PS anyone who's interested in following these discussions but doesn't yet know 
how to get at Usenet News, drop me a mail.