T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1029.1 | Comment | MACNAS::TJOYCE | | Tue Mar 31 1992 05:46 | 30 |
|
While we could get cynical about the above note, I see it as a sign
of hope.
After all, 10 years ago people like Adams and McGuinness were
loudly proclaiming unequivocal support for the IRA campaign.
They also regularly call on splinter group like the Irish
National Liberation Army (INLA) and the Irish People's
Liberation Organisation (IPLO) to cease from violence because
they have "no mandate". What mandate has the IRA?
A couple of years ago, Martin McGuinness transmited two messages
which he said came from the IRA high command: there would be
no more "punishment beatings" in Catholic areas, and no more
bombings on "economic targets". McGuiness has been made look
a fool on both counts, as the IRA has stepped up bombing
shops, pubs and factories, and punishment attacks ahve not
abated.
Personally, I think Adams is on the "two steps forward, one
step back" road to condemning the IRA. After all it is an
honourable path in Irish politics, being trod by such men
as Michael Collins, Eamon De Valera, Sean McBride, and
Thomas Mac Giolla.
The sooner the better. The carrot for Sinn Fein is to be
involved in talks.
Toby
|
1029.2 | | WMOIS::CHAPLAIN_F | Tempus Omnia Vincit | Tue Mar 31 1992 08:46 | 6 |
|
re .0
It seems as though the press are making utter fools of themselves,
focusing on old inciteful words instead of substantive issues.
|
1029.3 | Hmmm, look at the U.S. election ..... | MACNAS::TJOYCE | | Sat Apr 04 1992 09:55 | 12 |
|
The press in Northern Ireland are more to the point that those
graduates of the School of Negative Journalism who peddled the
Gennifer Flowers story about Bill Clinton.
Whether or not you support a violent organisation is a lot
more relevant that who you slept with.
So I wouldn't think too badly about Mark Brennock and his
peers. It could be a lot worse.
Toby
|
1029.4 | | EPIK::HOLOHAN | | Mon Apr 06 1992 12:00 | 6 |
|
re. .3
As regarding the British controlled press in
northern Ireland being to the point (the British
point that is) they sure are toby.
Mark
|
1029.5 | !~!!??? | MACNAS::TJOYCE | | Mon Apr 06 1992 12:53 | 7 |
|
WHAT! The Irish Times, Press and Independent, as well as RTE, Irish
News, Cork Examiner, Belfast Newsletter etc........ British controlled?
Is this another bout of paranoia a la Reverend Des Wilson?
Toby
|
1029.6 | | WMOIS::CHAPLAIN_F | Tempus Omnia Vincit | Mon Apr 06 1992 16:09 | 16 |
|
re .3
Sorry Toby, yer full of crap. Justifying stupidity by juxtaposing it
with ANOTHER stupidity is flawed logic.
And since when did ANYONE claim the American press is any less adept
at making fools of themselves than their Irish counterparts? While
surely Bill Clinton's paramours are an integral part of the American
approach to achieving global economic parity, the press might miss the
link and make the story into a lurid tabloid headline. :)
Anyway...I'd be far less inclined to go for sensationalism in the
north of Ireland than a serious attempt to achieve some lasting peace.
There's no shortage of lurid headlines there.
|
1029.7 | Farther away than ever .... | MACNAS::TJOYCE | | Sun Apr 12 1992 13:53 | 52 |
|
Now that the dust has settled and Gerry Adams has to set about
re-gaining his seat, it must be asked whatever did happen to
Sinn Fein?
Ten years ago in the bitter aftermath of the Maze Hunger Strikes,
Sinn Fein were able to garner 40% of Nationalist votes, something
like 14-15% of all votes cast in Northern Ireland. Since then
their votes have just about halved ........
In retrospect, it can be seen that Sinn Fein needed the emotional
high of the Hunger Strikes to get off to a flying start. Since
then it could only go backwards. The strategy of Adams and his
lieutenants was to capture seats in the Republic's parliament
and hold a balance of power there. Danny Morrison said "The
Free State will be decisive ........".
Unfortunately, citizens of the Republic don't like hearing their
country misnamed ("Free State" is often used in a derogatory sense
by self-styled "Republicans"). They also disliked a party which
condoned the IRA - unlike some correspondents to this topic, who
seem to think this matter irrelevant. HOwever, when two recruits
to the Irish security forces were killed trying to free a business
executive who had been kidnapped by the IRA, Adams clearly
signalled his position by saying that the IRA were "doing their
duty", implying somehow that the Irish security forces should
turn a bling eye to kidnappings for the IRA cause.
To be fair to Adams, it was a real dilemma for him. But he made a
wrong choice ... perhaps he was ignorant of the attachment that
the Southern people now have to the institutions of the Irish
Republic. Since then Sinn Fein was a major loser in the Republic,
and in election after election its vote has shrunk. Groups like
New Consensus challenged its authority to speak for Irish people
anywhere, it is now somehwere on the outer fringe of political
acceptability.
As the party's strategy in the South failed and morale slumped,
so also in the North morale inevitably suffered. By its strategy
committed to abstention, Sinn Fein was vulnerable to a party
like the SDLP who could actually get benefits for their
constituents. Hence the desperate posturing of Adams in the last
weeks in sending letters to the UN and the EC, in an effort to
show progress outside local affairs. But cut off from Inter-Party
talks by its support for the IRA, and carring the ball and chain of
IRA atrocities, Sinn Fein has neatly painted itself into a corner.
The motto of Sinn Fein has been "Tiocfaidh ar la" - " Our day will
come". Come it may, but at the moment it seems farther away than
ever.
Toby
|