T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
739.1 | Don't believe what you read | UBEAUT::BOYLE | Tony Boyle, Melbourne, Australia | Thu Apr 05 1990 04:12 | 11 |
|
>The goal is to obtain not just a contrast of how U.S.News media covered
>these events, but also to contrast coverage from different
>perspectives (non-U.S. news media), as well as bring another level which
>would be right and left wing perspectives.
You may be supprised to find something else.
- An excellent example of good old British CENSORSHIP !
(or Media-Gagging)
|
739.2 | whose truth is it? | RDVAX::ALBIE | | Thu Apr 05 1990 13:49 | 13 |
| Perhaps you are right..but will it be in a form that can be recognized?
The image of the U.S. press here is that it is uncensored unless in
wartime....that is, no formal censorship....however, that is not to
say that what gets published by news organizations is the "truth."
A quick analysis of the "sources" from which reporters/journalists
obtain their information can often reveal whose version of reality is
published.. So, generally speaking, reading the news is a lot of work
just to sort out and understand the hidden meanings and nuances
contained in a news report. I may be surprised with the results I come
up with after an analysis of various accounts of the topic areas I
mentioned...but then again, I may not be...Joan
|
739.3 | | USWAV1::CHAPLAIN | | Fri Apr 06 1990 08:25 | 28 |
|
Some years ago I took a course titled "International News
Interpretation". It was quite the eye-opener. We compared and
contrasted news coverage of numerous events as reported by European,
Asian, and American sources. Among the issues studied were the
downing of the Korean airliner by the Russians and the US bombing
of Libya which took place during the time when the course was
being given.
It was fascinating to observe the biased nature of the reports.
Coverage of the both events in American newspapers was marked by
almost rabid diatribe, denouncing the Russians and expressing glib
satisfaction over the Libyan bombing. The problem, of course, was
that reasoned coverage of the *facts* of both events was blatantly
absent in US papers while European and Asian publications were far
more restrained and rational.
The major discrepancy in the American news involved the OMISSION of
various facts surrounding each event, such as the deviation of the
course of the Korean airliner and the coverage of civilian casualties
in Libya, which WERE reported in the foreign journals.
In other words, read the news with a jaundiced eye, be discriminate,
and reserve final judgement based solely on the news coverage of
biased publications.
Frank
|
739.4 | is it the same event? | RDVAX::ALBIE | | Wed Apr 11 1990 14:27 | 14 |
| ref .3
Basically this is the same type of course...analyzing the coverage of
the Invasion of Grenada by various news organizations, and then doing
the same thing with the Falkland Islands/Malvinas war coverage.
Since I have to write a 20 page graduate-level research paper, it is
expected that I provide some insight into the various reasons for these
differences in coverage..by U.S., European, and Asian press..and assign
some responsibility for the variances...be they cultural, governmental
restrictions, or even the infrastructure of the news industry...
Any views of readers of this notesfile are welcome as to what you
attribute the wide disparities in coverage....Joan
|
739.5 | celts on both sides | CLOSET::WALTERS | | Thu Apr 12 1990 10:51 | 14 |
|
There's an interesting Celtic aspect to the Malvinas/Falklands war that you
might come across in your studies.
Argentina has a large Welsh community in Patagonia, where the Welsh
language was (and still is) preserved. During the Falklands war,
the Argentinian forces contained conscripts from this community and the
British forces also contained its Welsh contingent. There were some
news reports of Welsh-speaking members of both sides talking together
after the conflict.
Regards
Colin.
|
739.6 | who/what/where | RDVAX::ALBIE | | Thu Apr 12 1990 11:59 | 6 |
| Colin, I haven't seen any mention of this in any of the materials I
have reviewed so far...(in fact, I haven't any good source of materials
yet from the Argentinian perspective).
Could you, or other readers, point me to where I might find what you
are referring to in your note (conscripts). Joan
|
739.7 | Source | CLOSET::WALTERS | | Fri Apr 27 1990 11:02 | 11 |
|
Joan,
Communications from the old country reveal that the story was
reported in the South Wales Echo, Cardiff published by the Thomson
Press.
Regards,
Colin
|