T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
385.1 | all in a name | DUB01::POCONNELL | | Fri May 27 1988 08:16 | 10 |
| The major problem with the 'rod licences' it seems to me is the
use of the word "licence". Had CJH (that Irish Solution to an Irish
Problem) been more canny and called it a Fishery Development Bond
the nation would have scrambled to do it's patriotic duty.
When the R.C church introduced Planned Giving in the 1960s they
had more sense than to say that Tithes were being reintoduced (
...with no taxes or tithes to devour up our wages
while we're on the green field of Americay)
|
385.2 | Sounds fishy to me... ;-) | DEALIN::ONEILL | Its a LONG way to Tipperary... | Fri May 27 1988 10:07 | 73 |
|
I have yesterdays (thurs) Irish Times in front of me - the MAIN
headline on the front page is:
ANGLERS IN WEST DECIDE TO RENEW LICENCE BOYCOTT
This reads like serious stuff - I have heard that people are slashing
anglers car tires and other various 'rough' tactics - what I want
to know is whats the hullabaloo about?!? I mean its only a rod
licence for heavens sake, surely the proceeds will go to some sort
of fishing organisation which will improve the fisherpersons lot
in the country? Anyway seems to me to be a big fuss over realatively
little - its not as if the licence is a horrendous amount - when
you consider that 6million punts have already been lost to tourism...
I mean whats 15 punts (trout) and 10 punts (coarse) to pay if its
your livliehood or hobby?!? And WHY dont they object similarly
to the increase to 25 punts for the salmon licence...
Ive included some of the report...
Ann
The anglers and boatmen of the west of Ireland last nite unanimously
decided to reactivate their anti-rod licence campaign and impose
a fishing ban from tomorrow morning.
At an angry meeting in this angling resort between Loughs Corrib
and Mask, they voted to take all boats off the western lakes and
enforce a boycott once more. The boats will start coming off the
lakes at 10 in the morning.
The ban is expected to be enforced totally on Loughs Corrib, Mask
and Carra in the south Mayo-Galway region, as it had been before
last weeks 'ceasefire'/ An almost complete ban will be imposed
on Lough Conn in north Mayo where some anglers support the licence,
and partial bans will also be placed on most other lakes in Connacht,
Clare and Donegal.
The only hope of averting this drastic action lies in an agreement
by the hundreds attending the meeting that they might reconsider
if meaningful and credible peace proposals come for the Government.
The hope is that the mediator in the increasingly bitter dispute
- the Archbishop of Tuam, Dr Joseph Cassidy - might be approached
by the Government with som form of settlement offer.
The meeting heard that Dr Cassidy had earlier issued a statement
indicating that his services as a mediator were still readily available
but stressing that there should be no possibility of a misunderstanding
in any new settlement terms.
The decision to reimpose the boycott which already has cost losses
in tourist earnings of $6 million was the direct result of the action
by baliffs in the northwestern region checking for rod licences
on Lough Arrow, Co. Sligo on tuesday. Since last weeks truce the
fishermen had believed they could go out onto the lakes without
any chances of being bothered by the bailiffs.
Last nights meeting also agreed to mount demonstrations against
an international angling competition due to be hled on Lough Conn,
Co Mayo this weekend. The anglers and boatmen are to contact fishermen
on the continent, in northern Ireland and Britain and ask them not
to take part in the competition.
As the fishermen were meeting, the Archbishop of Tuam issued the
following statement:
"I became involved in this dispute for pastoral reasons. I shared
the concern of the clergy in the parishes around the western lakes
that a lot of bitterness was developing in the local communities
and that the livelihood of many people in the tourist industry was
being put at risk."
...and so it goes on...
|
385.3 | The shoot horses don't they ???? | STEREO::BURNS | Clare 3-12 Waterford 3-10 | Fri May 27 1988 12:21 | 13 |
|
SHOOT the fish
keVin
|
385.4 | Snagging a growse | DUB01::POCONNELL | | Mon May 30 1988 06:23 | 3 |
| Sorry to snipe at the suggestion in .3 but it's closed season for
trout shooting. I suppose they could try shooting the mayfly?
|
385.5 | GOVERNMENT FISHING FOR MONEY | AYOV11::EBYRNE | | Wed Jun 01 1988 08:42 | 13 |
| DO YOU REALLY THINK THAT THE MONEY COLLECTED FOR THE LICENCES WOULD
BE USED ON THE TROUT FISHERIES. I SUPPOSE NEXT I'LL BE TOLD THAT
CAR TAX IS USED ON THE ROADS.
I USED TO LIVE IN SLIGO AND FISHED THE BALLISODARE/COOLONY
RIVER FOR TROUT (YOU PAID EXTRA FOR FISHING SALMON). THE CLUB PAID
�4000 IN RATES EACH YEAR AND THE ONLY THING THE GOVERNMENT EVER
DID WAS TO TRY AND BACK A POWER STATION ON THE RIVER (ONE OF THE
BEST SALMON RIVERS IN IRELAND) WHICH WOULD HAVE DESTROYED IT. THE
LOCAL GOVERNEMENT ARE NEVER HEARD FROM.
IS IT ANY WONDER ANGLERS ARE ANNOYED.
EAMON
|
385.6 | More than a FEE (ling) | TALLIS::DARCY | Abolish Section 31 | Wed Jun 01 1988 11:00 | 8 |
| Paying the government a fee for fishing Irish lochs makes the
government the licensor, and thus gives them power over decision
making. Big European fishing companies would love nothing more
than control over Irish waters for their investment, and the license
fee is one step away from possible government allocation of waters
to these companies for fisheries, fish-farming, etc...
It's more than just a fee.
|
385.7 | Spare the rod and... | DUB01::OSULLIVAN_D | THINK AHEAd | Thu Jun 16 1988 11:10 | 5 |
| re: .0
Joe - you need a licence to fish in the fountain of knowledge.
-Dermot
|