[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference tallis::celt

Title:Celt Notefile
Moderator:TALLIS::DARCY
Created:Wed Feb 19 1986
Last Modified:Tue Jun 03 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1632
Total number of notes:20523

379.0. "Mna ag obair" by HBO::OFARRELL () Thu May 12 1988 09:51

        I have just read a memo of notes from the Manufacturing 
        Women's forum on which there was just one line about 
        Ireland:- "In Ireland there are 300 cases in the courts 
        where women were fired because they got married"
        
        While by no means do I want to give the impression that 
        there is equality in the workplace in Ireland or Digital 
        Ireland, I would like to refute the impression given by 
        the above single statement.
        
        Before doing so I would like to get my facts straight so 
        can someone confirm whether the above statement is true 
        (which I suspect it is) but more importantly give me the 
        background to the issue which I suspect leads to a 
        completely different conclusion than the one given by the 
        one sentence without background.
        
        Dia dhuit,
        
        Willie

T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
379.1How about...DEALIN::ONEILLIts a LONG way to Tipperary...Thu May 12 1988 11:5916
    
    	Hi Willie,
    
    	I heard about that forum but cant remember from where ... you
    	could put an entry in the WOMANNOTES file - Im sure some of
    	those ladies could point you in the right direction if you're
        having problems finding someone to help here
             
    	Will u publish any findings here on the subject?  Being fired
        because a woman got married seems to be a bit too sexist to
        be even tried by an employer - no matter what the job was!
    
    Ann
    
    
    	Ann
379.2Not TrueGAO::FERRIELiam Ferrie - GalwayThu May 12 1988 13:2920
    I found this a hard statistic to swallow.  From time to time we
    hear of individual cases in the newspapers but these are fairly
    rare. 

    I decided to phone the Employment Equality Agency [1] in Dublin to
    see if they could throw light on the matter.  First of all I was
    told (and already knew) that it is illegal to discriminate against
    a woman in the work place, by reason of her sex or marital status.
    Where a woman believes she has been discriminated against, she is
    entitled to take the matter to the Labour Court. The person I
    spoke said that "to the best of my knowledge there are NO such
    cases pending" and categorically discounted the allegation
    regarding the 300. 

    [1] The Employment Equality Agency was set up some years ago by
        the Government to ensure that women are treated fairly in all
        aspects of employment.
    
    		Liam 

379.3VAXWRK::DENISThu May 12 1988 16:027
    Re .2: Liam, I don't know if it's true, but in an English humorous
    book, (I could find the reference when I'll be back over the pond)
    I read a while ago that when accused by the EEC of salary
    discrimination between men and women, the Irish government hired some
    controllers to check the government offices to see if this was true:
    The wages offered were lower for women...
    			Denis.
379.4Not quite trueGAO::FERRIELiam Ferrie - GalwayThu May 12 1988 17:3331
    I would not believe everything I read about Ireland in an English
    humorous journal but they might have been referring to the
    following news story which I summarised in The Irish Emigrant, on
    February 7 last, as follows:
     
    
                      EQUAL PAY FOR UNEQUAL WORK

       Bord Telecom refused to grant some female staff pay
       equality with their male colleagues on the grounds that
       the men were doing lesser work.  The existing legislation
       only calls for equal pay for equal work.  The females were
       left on a lower rate of pay. The case eventually went to
       the European court (with the backing of the Government)
       where the women won out. 

    
    Bord Telecom is a semi-state body and it is not clear to me
    why it had to go to court at all but I can think on two possible
    reasons:
    
    a) the Government wanted to set a precedent so that private
       employers could not use this excuse?
    
    b) Bord Telecom were afraid that if they paid the women more
       without going to court then the Unions might have insisted on 
       an increase for the men to maintain traditional pay 
       differentials?  Maybe I am being unfair to the Unions. 
    

		Liam
379.5VAXWRK::DENISFri May 13 1988 09:304
    Re .4: I remember that article in "The Irish Emigrant", Liam, but
    what I was refering to was published in a book about 9 or 10 years
    ago. I guess the case is still not resolved...
    			Denis.