T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
379.1 | How about... | DEALIN::ONEILL | Its a LONG way to Tipperary... | Thu May 12 1988 11:59 | 16 |
|
Hi Willie,
I heard about that forum but cant remember from where ... you
could put an entry in the WOMANNOTES file - Im sure some of
those ladies could point you in the right direction if you're
having problems finding someone to help here
Will u publish any findings here on the subject? Being fired
because a woman got married seems to be a bit too sexist to
be even tried by an employer - no matter what the job was!
Ann
Ann
|
379.2 | Not True | GAO::FERRIE | Liam Ferrie - Galway | Thu May 12 1988 13:29 | 20 |
| I found this a hard statistic to swallow. From time to time we
hear of individual cases in the newspapers but these are fairly
rare.
I decided to phone the Employment Equality Agency [1] in Dublin to
see if they could throw light on the matter. First of all I was
told (and already knew) that it is illegal to discriminate against
a woman in the work place, by reason of her sex or marital status.
Where a woman believes she has been discriminated against, she is
entitled to take the matter to the Labour Court. The person I
spoke said that "to the best of my knowledge there are NO such
cases pending" and categorically discounted the allegation
regarding the 300.
[1] The Employment Equality Agency was set up some years ago by
the Government to ensure that women are treated fairly in all
aspects of employment.
Liam
|
379.3 | | VAXWRK::DENIS | | Thu May 12 1988 16:02 | 7 |
| Re .2: Liam, I don't know if it's true, but in an English humorous
book, (I could find the reference when I'll be back over the pond)
I read a while ago that when accused by the EEC of salary
discrimination between men and women, the Irish government hired some
controllers to check the government offices to see if this was true:
The wages offered were lower for women...
Denis.
|
379.4 | Not quite true | GAO::FERRIE | Liam Ferrie - Galway | Thu May 12 1988 17:33 | 31 |
| I would not believe everything I read about Ireland in an English
humorous journal but they might have been referring to the
following news story which I summarised in The Irish Emigrant, on
February 7 last, as follows:
EQUAL PAY FOR UNEQUAL WORK
Bord Telecom refused to grant some female staff pay
equality with their male colleagues on the grounds that
the men were doing lesser work. The existing legislation
only calls for equal pay for equal work. The females were
left on a lower rate of pay. The case eventually went to
the European court (with the backing of the Government)
where the women won out.
Bord Telecom is a semi-state body and it is not clear to me
why it had to go to court at all but I can think on two possible
reasons:
a) the Government wanted to set a precedent so that private
employers could not use this excuse?
b) Bord Telecom were afraid that if they paid the women more
without going to court then the Unions might have insisted on
an increase for the men to maintain traditional pay
differentials? Maybe I am being unfair to the Unions.
Liam
|
379.5 | | VAXWRK::DENIS | | Fri May 13 1988 09:30 | 4 |
| Re .4: I remember that article in "The Irish Emigrant", Liam, but
what I was refering to was published in a book about 9 or 10 years
ago. I guess the case is still not resolved...
Denis.
|