[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference tallis::celt

Title:Celt Notefile
Moderator:TALLIS::DARCY
Created:Wed Feb 19 1986
Last Modified:Tue Jun 03 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1632
Total number of notes:20523

329.0. "American/British Extradition Treaty Commences" by TALLIS::DARCY (Amach leat) Fri Feb 12 1988 10:52

    The US yesterday extradited its first American to Britain for
    prosecution under its special extradiction treaty with Britain.
    The first to go was a a guy by the name of Quinn, an American
    who was allegedly shot and killed a British policeman, when
    the police came upon a bomb factory for the IRA in England.
    Quinn was a third generation Irish-American, who had lived
    in the Republic for 10 years during the 70s.  Another person
    is slated to go next week.
    
    Aside from the crime itself, I find the extradition treaty very
    unnerving.  We live in a country where Nicaraguan "freedom fighters",
    Polish "Solidarity members", Afghan "rebels", Cuban "mercinaries",
    Chilean "dictatorship", etc. are given safe haven in the US.
    What distinguishes these groups from the IRA?  Really now?
    They all commit crimes, they all kill people.  But yet only one
    group is deported for these crimes.
    
    Who picks the group's political attribute on the evening news?
    Shall we call them "freedom fighters"?  "rebels"? "terrorists"?
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
329.1Here's my ideas on the subject(and beyond)DPDMAI::OREILLYMy wife and dog are more Irish!Fri Feb 12 1988 14:5240
    
    
    I don't claim, by any means, to have much knowledge about the
    situation, but here's my opinion...
    
    It seems that the "terrorist" label that the IRA has now, whether
    earned or labeled by the press, is maybe why they're the only one
    out of the group you mentioned that is extradited.
    
    Mr. Reagan's attempts to end the terrorist attacks on Americans
    around the world may have something to do with it.  Maybe one example:
    Britian let the USA use their country as a stop for our jets that
    strafed  Libya.  So, the British lent us a hand there, to help us
    stop terrorism by Libya against us, and we're now helping them to stop
    what, in the British eyes, is "terrorism" against them.  
    
    Unfortunately and amazingly, the USA, even with its very large
    population of citizens that have Irish Roots of one level or another,
    seems to view the IRA as "terrorists".
    
    As I've learned more and more over the last year about the history
    involved, I've gained much more sympathy for the IRA, although I
    still don't agree with any kind of violence.  
    
    It would be interesting to read the history books of those that are
    completely on the side of the British, to see how they justify their
    viewpoint.
    
    I would like to see every American that has some Irish heritage in their
    past, to learn what I have learned and maybe our Government would
    ask Britian some tough questions and not be so cooperative in
    "extradition policy".
    
    The whole situation is a very complex one.  Because of that, it's
    difficult to take a stand completely one way or the other.  I would
    have to study the situation in great detail from every viewpoint
    before I could justify taking a stand.
    
    JO'R
    
329.2From "The irish Emigrant" newsletter ...STEREO::BURNS1988 will be a BANNER yearTue Feb 23 1988 12:598
    
    
- William Quinn, a native of San Francisco, was jailed for life 
  in London for the murder of a London policeman.  Quinn was 
  extradited from the U.S. in October 1986 after spending a 
  number of years in prison there while he fought extradition.