T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
321.1 | Holy Cow | WELSWS::MANNION | This land ain't _her_ land | Tue Jan 26 1988 08:48 | 13 |
| No, I'm not surprised at all. Thatcher is having a fit of deepest
security at the moment. Last night's Panorama interview was enough
to make you sick, all her talk about "the common people" not wanting
any freedom of information about the security forces and their
subversive little games. The "Stalker" decision is from the same
place, really.
She said recently that "there is no such thing as society", what
she wants to protect is the privilege and power of her kind, so
I'm sure she'd think that there is such a thing as The Establishment.
The Police are just one of her arms in defending it.
Phillip
|
321.2 | There is a suker punch coming.... | GAOV07::MHUGHES | dean corp-trialladh don banrion | Tue Jan 26 1988 13:50 | 19 |
| Leaprechauns will update the Boston Globe.
The Irish government is NOT seeking clarification from the British
government.
It IS seeking clarification from the Anglo-Irish Secretariat (a
formal creation of joint Irish-British civil servants), a body
set up by the Anglo-Irish agreement.
My opinion is that this is a very clever ploy by C.J. Haughey the
Taoiseach. The Anglo-Irish secretariat cannot get the inquiry report
as it is not being made public.
C.J. Haughey might be using the formal mechanisms of the Anglo-Irish
agreement (which he operates with strong reservations), to dig the
grave of the agreement. Now if the agreement cannot deliver it will
look like a complete waste of time, money, energy, and possibly
lives.
Snake sees a devious scheming mind at work...... and he knows his
like when he see it.
|
321.3 | "Will he, or won't he...? | RUNWAY::FARRINGTON | TIOCFAIDH AR LA | Wed Jan 27 1988 06:18 | 9 |
| (A Cynical Note of Caution)
Ah yes, the 'Boss' is mischievous, but is he Machiaveillan?
The man has an affinity for the status of power, but given the
opportunity to *scrap* the Anglo-Irish agreement, will C.J. risk
the status of his tacitly agreed upon "National" government with
F.G., and the P.D.'s?
Greater promise always carries the burden of greater doubt!
|