| Title: | HSJ30/40 Product Conference |
| Moderator: | SSDEVO::EDMONDS |
| Created: | Mon Jul 12 1993 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 1264 |
| Total number of notes: | 4958 |
Problem passed to me by field engineer:-
HSJ40 based disk (RZ28M) is part of a shadow set.
The HSJ40 is one of a dual-redundant pair, both running HSOF 2.7-0J
On one HSJ40, the drive is operating OK.
On the other HSJ it shows as "misconfigured".
As far as can be determined, the drive changed from "OK" to
"misconfigured" at some time after it was known to be operating OK.
The first indication of a problem came when the amber light on the
drive started to flash.
There are no errors in the cluster-wide errorlog to indicate that the
drive had a problem.
This is the second occurrence of this type. The last time was on a
different drive and different HSJ pair.
At present it is not possible to delete and re-add the drive (it
refuses to delete).
I found some notes references which may explain this restriction:-
Topic 617.0 in Conference vmsnotes_v12:
DECnotes Reply 32.1 in Conference hsj40_product on ssdevo
DECnotes Topic 3118.0 in Conference ask_ssag on ssag
Has anybody else observed this problem?
Dave Clark
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1240.1 | GIDDAY::HOBBS | Andy Hobbs. Sydney CSC. -730 5964 | Wed Apr 23 1997 20:14 | 17 | |
Dave,
I've had this a few times and I've issued a CLEAR UNKNOWN from the
dubiously-informed HSJ40, even while VMS was using the target unit
via the other controller - it fixed it, but didn't negatively affect
the operating system.
Anything which causes the HSJ40 pair to disagree with each other,
scares the heck out of me.
Is it possible to RESTART the one with the problem ?
Are you running with WB Cache ? (Get 2.7-1, if so - Saves Ronald
telling you ;^)
Andy/.
| |||||
| 1240.2 | Yup I like to keep people up to date with patches... | SSDEVO::RMCLEAN | Fri Apr 25 1997 15:32 | 10 | |
Aww... You ruined my fun! ;-.] Yup I believe that there were times with V2.7 where the two differed because the state info was not transferred between the HSJ's. As .-1 will tell you it really is not important because the correct info is on the running controller. This was especially true about sizes of things because the backup controller was unable to get the drives long enough to find out what their state is. I think you will find that this is improved with V3.1 | |||||
| 1240.3 | Removeables are worse... | SSDEVO::FIALA | Me, I'm just a recycler. | Wed May 28 1997 10:02 | 9 |
The state "appears" different more often with removeable media tapes+, cd's, opticals. As long as the online controller has the perceived correct state its of no concern. The problem is that the controller checking the unit state may/may-not be the one mastering the device. This would! be a problem if the unit were able to be online to both controlers and simultaneous accessed like the Massbuss. But this isnt the Massbuss [although I wonder about scsi]... | |||||