T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
484.1 | curious | SMURF::BAT | Segui la tua beatitudine | Mon Apr 21 1997 14:31 | 3 |
| Nothing I've heard of but I'll ask around.
By MLS+ V4.0a "Beta" do you mean rev 38 or what?
|
484.2 | works here but we haven't set up sun: nfsstat say anything? | SMURF::BAT | Segui la tua beatitudine | Mon Apr 21 1997 19:45 | 22 |
| Lee suggests running tcpdump (see note on tcpdump setup) on the MLS+
box in between.
Set it up so that it is looking at both interfaces.
And then to monitor the traffic between the far MLS+ box and the Sun
box. You should be able to see the traffic from the far box go out
the interface on the Sun side, and you should see the traffic from the
Sun side go to the far MLS+ box.
FYI: Lee set up a set of systems in the lab such that:
[ single level ] <-> [ MLS+ box A ] <-> [ MLS+ box b ]
Single level is exporting to the world (no restrictions in
/etc/exports).
MLS+ box B is importing from Single Level. On MLS+ Box B you can
cd down 6 levels (that's all we tried) and look around. Works fine.
If we can set up a Sun box we will.
|
484.3 | Beta = rev 38 | NNTPD::"[email protected]" | Mark Sowards | Tue Apr 22 1997 18:16 | 5 |
|
Yes, early in March I ftp'ed and Barbara FedEx'ed what was the lates
pre-release
version of MLS+4.0a I believe it was rev 38.
[Posted by WWW Notes gateway]
|
484.4 | see 446.13: what if they try resetting the Sun MTU_WINDOW? | SMURF::BAT | Segui la tua beatitudine | Tue Apr 22 1997 19:06 | 11 |
| Hi Mark,
Lee found a Sun system here and we've reproduced the problem.
tcpdump is telling us that the intermediate MLS+ box is not
sending any full size frags through to the target MLS+ box.
Once again it appears that somewhere the packet size is not
getting decremented by the size of the IP options. Or something
like that :-)
More later.
|
484.5 | sorry don't have a fix instantly | SMURF::BAT | Segui la tua beatitudine | Tue Apr 22 1997 20:09 | 14 |
| It looks at though the NFS code is not setting the max MTU size down by
the size of the potential IP header options.
But I'm not sure where the adjustment should go, I'll have to consult
with others.
Notes for us: See submit 181 for the one that fixed the tcp code
(pmtu.c). tcp_mss_send subtracts 40 if it is SEC_NET (a subsequent
code re-basing fixed the IP options header calculation, so I think the
#if SEC_NET stuff line 960 stuff should go away, see submit # 530).
But it appears NFS code is using a different algorithm for calculating
the size (ku_sendto_mbuf:kudp_fastsend.c)... but is this the { only }
udp place that needs adjusting?
|
484.6 | Thanks for the quick info | NNTPD::"[email protected]" | Mark Sowards | Tue Apr 22 1997 21:08 | 15 |
| Thanks for the rapid response. I'm sure my customer will be happy at
finally finding somethineg that wasn't User error.
I don't follow this though......
>>> Notes for us: See submit 181 for the one that fixed the tcp code
>>> (pmtu.c). tcp_mss_send subtracts 40 if it is SEC_NET (a subsequent
>>> code re-basing fixed the IP options header calculation, so I think the
>>> #if SEC_NET stuff line 960 stuff should go away, see submit # 530).
I breathlessly await your contemplations.
Thanks.....
[Posted by WWW Notes gateway]
|
484.7 | | SMURF::BAT | Segui la tua beatitudine | Wed Apr 23 1997 14:48 | 4 |
| > I don't follow this though......
See where it says "Notes for us:"? I didn't include "You" in "Us" (how
very rude). I should have said "Notes to myself" or something.
|
484.8 | See note 446.13 -- the customer set the MTU_WINDOW size? | SMURF::BAT | Segui la tua beatitudine | Thu Apr 24 1997 22:13 | 13 |
| Mark, do you happen to know how to tell the Sun system to limit its
MTU_WINDOW? We'd like to try that here and see what effect it has, and
have no documentation for our system (and no man pages).
tcpdump is telling us that the fragments that are the max mms of 1480
bytes are being dropped by the routing MLS+ box. Smaller packets get
forwarded.
Lee exported a single-level file system from a vanilla DIGITAL UNIX box
and the MLS+ box in-between had no problem passing the packets through
to the importing MLS+ box.
So apparently the problem is not reproducible without a Sun system.
|
484.9 | now we can reproduce their workaround? | SMURF::BAT | Segui la tua beatitudine | Thu May 15 1997 20:31 | 13 |
| I spoke with Mark this afternoon, and he got the info from David
Hustler. To set the MTU window size on the Sun,
# ifconfig -a
to get the list of config'ed devices
# ifconfig dev mtu size
where "dev" is the name of the device from the -a list
where "size" is the size to which you want to set the interface
He said that they are using this as a workaround at the moment to
handle this importing problem.
|
484.10 | and the winner is.... | SMURF::SCHOFIELD | Rick Schofield, DTN 381-0116 | Fri May 23 1997 14:04 | 75 |
| We were able not only to reproduce the original problem, but to
exacerbate it to the point where we couldn't even _mount_ the
Solaris-exported file system on the MLS client. What we discovered
follows:
There were 3 systems directly involved in mounting the Sun filesystem:
the MLS+ nfs client (on net 10.50.*.*), the MLS+ system doing the
routing (routing for 16.141.*.* and 10.50.*.*) and the Sun box (on net
16.141.*.*). It looked like this:
MLS+ routed -s
MLS+ routed -q +---------------------+
+-------------------+ | chopin: |
| | | ln0 = 16.141.96.243 |>-----+
| yjustey: | | | |
| tu0 = 10.50.96.82 |>------------------<| ychopin: | |
+-------------------+ | ln1 = 10.50.96.243 | |
+---------------------+ |
|
Sun routed -q |
+---------------------+ |
| stike: | |
| le0 = 16.141.96.171 |>------------------------+
+---------------------+
The problem boils down to the fact that there were multiple systems on
the 16.141 net which were attempting to route for 10.50 (by running
routed -s). (Check out the attached output from the ping -R command to
see how many goofy routes the simple ping was taking). This caused a
cyberfight among conflicting routers, all of whom had their own ideas
about where to route packets between stike and yjustey. Once these
systems had their routed's changed to the -q flag, the nfs problems
went away between stike and yjustey. In fact, not only could the
exported filesystem on stike be mounted by yjustey, but directories at
any depth could be examined and all normal nfs operations could be
performed without error.
So let's have the customer perform the following tests to see if the
problem at their end is similar. Capture the output from these
commands:
1) On the MLS+ nfs client:
ping -R <sun_hostname>
on the Sun box:
ping -R <mls_nfs_client_hostname>
2) On a third system somewhere on the network that the sun box is on:
# cd /dev
# ./MAKDEV pfilt
# ifconfig -a (note the name of the network device - usually either
ln0 or tu0)
# pfconfig +p +c <devicename>
# tcpdump -s 256 -N host <sun_system>
Then on the mls nfs client system, reproduce the failure condition
by traversing the filesystem mounted from the sun box.
Rick
yjustey:[ UNCLASSIFIED ]> ping -R stike
PING stike.zk3.dec.com (16.141.96.171): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 16.141.96.171: icmp_seq=0 ttl=248 time=14 ms
RR: chopin (16.141.96.243)
stike.zk3.dec.com (16.141.96.171)
16.141.96.239
16.141.96.2
16.141.96.241
16.141.96.2
16.141.96.239
16.141.96.2
ychopin.zk3.dec.com (10.50.96.243)
64 bytes from 16.141.96.171: icmp_seq=1 ttl=248 time=5 ms (same route)
64 bytes from 16.141.96.171: icmp_seq=2 ttl=248 time=6 ms (same route)
|
484.11 | still need to follow up on this with Lockheed | SMURF::BAT | Segui la tua beatitudine | Thu May 29 1997 18:19 | 9 |
| Mark said they were worried that the systems wouldn't do the routing if
they weren't running -s. I said they should first verify with netstat
-r and tcpdump to see if having multiple systems running routed -s was
the problem. And it makes a difference whether it is a class A or not
network.
I said that were were able to not have the MTU_WINDOW size on the Sun
box reconfigured to a smaller value and it was working. (I hope that
is correct.) Why their changing it to make it work was a red herring.
|