Title: | ase |
Moderator: | SMURF::GROSSO |
Created: | Thu Jul 29 1993 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 2114 |
Total number of notes: | 7347 |
Hi, Is it a good idea to implment Oracle Parallel Server on a Data Warehouse of at 600GB? I expect more read than write queries. 10 concurrent queries will be expected. I believe OPS provides load balance of 10 queries and high availability. OPS has overhead. Given more read transactions, does OPS improve performance? Thanks, Patrick
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023.1 | Why not? | NNTPD::"[email protected]" | Dave Cherkus | Fri Apr 25 1997 14:05 | 13 |
I have next to no field experience, but I did help support the use of OPS in a large data warehouse (read-intensive) benchmark, and I do believe Digital did win the business. I guess the question is: why not use OPS for a data warehouse application. You may want to ask in the ORACLE notesfile (BELFAST::ORACLE, last time I looked). They tend to be much better at this kind of question. Dave [Posted by WWW Notes gateway] |