T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1939.1 | Not 90%! | NETRIX::"[email protected]" | Gregory P. Myrdal | Wed Apr 02 1997 12:18 | 11 |
| Shyam,
I am not a scsi engineer, however, from my experience I would say there
might be something wrong with your scsi. A normal relocation of a
service should not produce scsi reservation failures. We do see scsi
reserve failures on reboot, but that's because ASE runs all of the stop
scripts at boot time. But normal relocations should work without these
errors.
-- Greg
[Posted by WWW Notes gateway]
|
1939.2 | Nothing wrong, just a dumb application | SMURF::KNIGHT | Fred Knight | Wed Apr 02 1997 17:54 | 19 |
| This type of error is typically triggered by an application.
Consider the following:
Host 1 reserves a device to offer a service.
Host 2 has an application that polls ALL scsi devices every
5 minutes to present some status information. These polling
accesses will always FAIL when it gets to the device that
host 1 has reserved.
The trick is to find which application on host 2 is the one
that is doing the polling, and get it to stop polling the
device that is reserved by host 1.
Nothing wrong at all (in the H/W or S/W), just a non-ASE aware
application.
Fred
|
1939.3 | Could NFS be the spoiler ? | QCAV01::DEVARAJAN | | Mon Apr 14 1997 04:22 | 23 |
| Re .1 & .2 :
Thanks for the info. There are no SCSI reserve failures during a
reboot. This happens only when there is a shutdown of one of the
members. Actually there are 2 NFS services running on 2 AlphaServer
2100s (one on each system). Their device ids are /dev/rza8c and
/dev/rzc8c. On top of one of these services we have layered two Login
services (as given in Internet AlphaSErver software). The other NFS
service does NOT have any "dependent" service on top of it. Even
then, we get SCSI reservation failures when this service (which does
not have any dependents) relocates during a shutdown.
This happens most of the times. As per Re .2, we can understand
that NFS could be the spoiler in the case of the first service which
has dependents. But it does NOT explain why the second service also
should have the same reservation problems (the one which does NOT have
any dependents).
Any inputs or comments ?
Thanks
PS : I work with Shyam (the original poster) in the same proj.
|