| Title: | ase |
| Moderator: | SMURF::GROSSO |
| Created: | Thu Jul 29 1993 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 2114 |
| Total number of notes: | 7347 |
Customer is planning the following ASE 1.3 config.
He currently has 2100a and will get 8200 or 8400 system with
4-6 cpus and 2-4 gig. memory.
For cost reasons he wants to using existing 2100a as the
failover machine. The 2100a is maxed out now and I really
wonder if failover can even work given that the Oracle work load
will increase because of the additional power of the 8xxx.
Any comments on this config?
dick
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1915.1 | KITCHE::schott | Eric R. Schott USG Product Management | Thu Mar 06 1997 05:06 | 20 | |
Hi You do want to enasure that each workload runs proplerly on both machines....the 2100 would limit the number of shared busses and it performance is slower...but if the customer is happy with it, and you tested that it works, there is no reason not to support it. > > Customer is planning the following ASE 1.3 config. > He currently has 2100a and will get 8200 or 8400 system with > 4-6 cpus and 2-4 gig. memory. > For cost reasons he wants to using existing 2100a as the > failover machine. The 2100a is maxed out now and I really > wonder if failover can even work given that the Oracle work load > will increase because of the additional power of the 8xxx. > > Any comments on this config? > dick | |||||